Vapor specific volume, estimation

Flash the inlet stream at relieving pressure (P ) and relieving temperature (T ), and estimate the liquid and vapor specific volumes and mass fraction. 

It is necessary, therefore, to know the value of the emissive power E ), the view factor (F), the atmospheric transmissivity (t), and the distance between the flame and the target. To know this distance, it is necessary to estimate the height at which the fireball is located. In fact, this height is a function of the specific volume and the latent heat of vaporization of the fuel therefore, strictly speaking, it varies with the substance. This is not usually taken into account. Diverse correlations have been proposed to estimate this height one of the most simple ones is the following ... 

The values of AA were estimated for water at supercritical temperatures and at several P2 over the range 1-1000 bars from Eq. (21) using specific volumes obtained from the ASME Steam Tables. Water vapor at a pressure of 1 bar and at the temperature of interest was ehosen as the standard state, but it is emphasized that other standard states are readily defined. 

From above flash (vapor = 0.01 mole fraction), is estimated as the difference between vapor and liquid specific volumes. Sinrilarly, the latent heat of vaporization is esfablished as tire difference between the vapor and liquid specific enfhalpies. 

At the fundamental level of equilibrium modeling the advantages are many. The model can combine a number of compartments through simple relationship to describe a realistic environment within which chemicals can be ranked and compared. Primary compartments that chemicals will tend to migrate toward or accumulate in can be identified. The arrangement of compartments and their volumes can be selected to address specific environmental scenarios. Data requirements are minimal, if the water solubility and vapor pressure of a chemical are known, other properties can be estimated, and a reasonable estimate of partitioning characteristics can be made. This is an invaluable tool in the early evaluation of chemical, whether the model be applied to projected environmental hazard or evaluation of the behavior of a chemical in an environmental application, as with pesticides. Finally, the approach is mathematically very simple and can be handled on simple computing devices. 

The major differences between behavior profiles of organic chemicals in the environment are attributable to their physical-chemical properties. The key properties are recognized as solubility in water, vapor pressure, the three partition coefficients between air, water and octanol, dissociation constant in water (when relevant) and susceptibility to degradation or transformation reactions. Other essential molecular descriptors are molar mass and molar volume, with properties such as critical temperature and pressure and molecular area being occasionally useful for specific purposes. A useful source of information and estimation methods on these properties is the handbook by Boethling and Mackay (2000). 

Of the cubic EoS given in Table 2-354, the Soave and Peng-Robinson are the most accurate, but there is no general mle for which EoS produces the best estimated volumes for specific fluids or conditions. The Peng-Robinson equation has been better tuned to liquid densities, while the Soave equation has been better tuned to vapor-liquid equilibrium and vapor densities. In solving the cubic equation for volume, a convenient initial guess to find the vapor root is the ideal gas value, while an initial value of 1.05h is convenient to locate the liquid root. 

While accurate estimation of flue gas volumes requires heat and material balance and iterative calculations, a few mles of thumb can be used to produce a rough estimate. The heat required to raise the soil temperature to 1400°F is equal to the weight of soil (moisture free, 32,000 x 0.9) times the temperature difference (1400—60) times the specific heat [approximately 0.30Btu/(lb°F)], or 12 MBtu/h (1 MBtu = lO Btu). To vaporize the 3200 Ib/h water, 3 MBtu/h is required. Available heat at a kiln exhaust gas temperature of 1500°F at 50% excess air is 45%, so a total of 33 MBtu/h is required. Adding in radiation loss brings this to 35 MBtu/h. The secondary combustion chamber takes approximately an equal amount of heat, or 35 Btu/h. Adding these two produces total heat input of 70 MBtu/h. 

We could compare the values found here with those we would find in Figure 10.8, if we could read that figure accurately enough. Instead, we read the values from [2], which are identical to those in Figme 10.8 and much easier to read. We see that the calculated vapor volmne in this example is 2.3% more than that in [2], and the calculated hquid volume is 11% more. The additional terms in the BWR EOS used in [2] are mostly there to give a more accurate estimate of the hquid specific volmne. 

---