Van der Waals function

In the region of a first-order transition ip has equal minima at volumes V and V2, in line with the Maxwell construction. The mixed phase is the preferred state in the volume range between V and V2. It follows that the transition from vapour to liquid does not occur by an unlikely fluctuation in which the system contracts from vapour to liquid at uniform density, as would be required by the maximum in the Van der Waals function. Maxwell construction allows the nudeation of a liquid droplet by local fluctuation within the vapour, and subsequent growth of the liquid phase. 

State energy calculations are also assisted by TDDFT. This development principally concerns the van der Waals (vdW) or dispersion-force component of the groundstate energy. The usual groundstate LDA and its various gradient extensions [227] do not give an adequate description of vdW forces [228], presumably because these forces arise (in one picture at least see below) from the correlations between dynamic electron density fluctuations in widely separated positions. This makes the usual local or near-local approximations invalid. The approach to be introduced here facilitates the derivation of van der Waals functionals via a frequency integration over dynamic susceptibilities. 

The van der Waals function is changed from the Buckingham potential (Eq. 12) to the pure repulsive form (Eq. 13). 

Hydrogen bonding in water dimer has been extensively studied both theoretically and experimentally. The empirical form for a hydrogen bond potential energy function V b, which is compatible with usual van der Waals functions, is not well established. A clear separation of the coulombic component would... 

This function has the added problem, however, that at very short distances it becomes sharply attractive an unrealistic situation, and again one must be careful that the geometry is based upon reasonable distances. The last Van der Waals function which will be considered is the Morse curve. This particular formulation has been suggested for a number of reasons, and is considered to have sig-... 

Other important,differences in the set of potential energy functions include the form of the van der Waals function, the number of terms in the torsional energy function, and the way electrostatic interactions and conjugated systems are handled. 

Further simplifications to the MM energy function can be introduced such as by ignoring the electrostatic contribution for nonpolar compounds, and/or using mainly the repulsive part of the van der Waals function by ignoring the van der Waals energy for atom pairs with an interatomic distance greater than a certain threshold. Obviously, these simplifications will generally improve the speed of calculations, but they do so at some cost in accuracy. 

Another commonly used and more physically grounded van der Waals function form is the Buckingham potential [94, 95], as is included with the MM2 and MM3 force fields [96, 97]. It consists of a physically appealing repulsion term, known as the Bom-Mayer exponential function (AR = and an attractive... 

The Coulomb and exchange-repulsion terms for GEM are evaluated with the same expressions as for GEM (Eqs. 8.10 and 8.11). Since GEM includes an explicit term for exchange, it was necessary to modify the original van der Waals function implemented in AMOEBA. In this case, we have modified the buffered Halgren function (modHalgren) by removing the repulsive term as follows ... 

If one has good van der Waals and electrostatic properties for a molecule, and its structure, then one should be able to calculate the crystal packing accurately, and also the heat of sublimation of the crystal. One can also calculate, with more difficulty, the density and heat of vaporization of a liquid. This has been done, and it is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition that good results can be obtained in such calculations to be sure that the van der Waals functions are reasonable. 

How do we evaluate the parameters needed for the van der Waals function for all of the various atoms on which we will wish to carry out molecular mechanics calculations There are different ways that one might try to do this. What we will discuss here is the method that was used for evaluating these parameters for MM4. These gave the best values that we were able to determine at the time. We do wish to point out that all of the parameters in a force field are, to some extent at least, interdependent. Accordingly, one cannot transfer parameters from one force field to another with reliable results. The way a molecular mechanics force field is developed is to fit various pieces of information as well as possible with the parameters available in that force field. For each error or inaccuracy in any particular parameter, the nature of the fitting is such that the rest of the parameters in the force field will adjust in such a way as to... 

There is a real problem here in the following way. We can measure the van der Waals properties of a molecule such as methane, for example. But we cannot individually measure the van der Waals properties for the hydrogen atoms and for the carbon atom in methane. And the numbers that we would like to use will vary somewhat, depending on the exact function chosen for the van der Waals interaction, and on the other approximations that have been previously outlined. And from this point, different workers managed to deduce rather different values for van der Waals functions, as discussed earlier. 

Because of the flatness of the van der Waals function near the energy minimum, rather small energy differences can lead to sizable shifts in the location of such minima along the distance axis. In the average complex in Table 9.6, while the Lewis bond energy amounts to only about 0.5kcal/mol, the N - C distance is shortened by 0.14 A. 

Repeat this exercise using the van der Waals function as described in Exercise 2.1c. 

---