Validation repeatabilities

Evaluate the kinetic energy correction factor a in Bernoulli s equation for turbulent flow assuming that the 1/7 power law velocity profile [Eq. (6-36)] is valid. Repeat this for laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid in a tube, for which the velocity profile is parabolic. 

As an identity (ID) test, per ICH guidelines, only selectivity is required in method qualification and validation. Repeatability and intermediate precision are often included to ensure reliability of p7 determinations. Additionally, method robustness should be tested to assure that the assay performance is suitable for QC environment. Quantitative parameters such as LOD/LOQ are not required for an ID assay. If a cIEF method is used for purity determination, then all the purity parameters shown in Section 4 should be qualified. The following sections illustrate an example of method development and qualification procedures for cIEF. 

The efficacy of any new procedure should be validated, and the validation repeated at regular intervals thereafter, or when any significant change is made in the process or equipment. 

The primary benefit to be derived from reliability and safety engineering is the reliability and integrity growth which arises from ongoing analysis and follow-up as well as from the corrective actions brought about by failure analysis. Reliability prediction, based on the manipulation of failure rate data, involves so many potential parameters that a valid repeatable model for failure rate estimation is not possible. Thus, failure rate is the least accurate of engineering parameters and prediction from past data should be carried out either ... 

In cases of lymphocytic thyroiditis with hyperthyroidism however, uptake and hormone secretion functions are uncoupled. Uptake function is blocked, but hormonal secretion proceeds. In these cases radioactive iodine uptake tests are not valid. Repeated measurements of total thyroid iodine by XRF can however give an estimate of the rate of decline of the iodine pool and this indirectly allows an... 

Sampling saturated reservoirs with this technique requires special care to attempt to obtain a representative sample, and in any case when the flowing bottom hole pressure is lower than the bubble point, the validity of the sample remains doubtful. Multiple subsurface samples are usually taken by running sample bombs in tandem or performing repeat runs. The samples are checked for consistency by measuring their bubble point pressure at surface temperature. Samples whose bubble point lie within 2% of each other may be sent to the laboratory for PVT analysis. 

Another method of detection of overfitting/overtraining is cross-validation. Here, test sets are compiled at run-time, i.e., some predefined number, n, of the compounds is removed, the rest are used to build a model, and the objects that have been removed serve as a test set. Usually, the procedure is repeated several times. The number of iterations, m, is also predefined. The most popular values set for n and m are, respectively, 1 and N, where N is the number of the objects in the primary dataset. This is called one-leave-out cross-validation. 

Alternatively, authors have repeatedly invoked the internal pressure of water as an explanation of the rate enhancements of Diels-Alder reactions in this solvent ". They were probably inspired by the well known large effects of the external pressure " on rates of cycloadditions. However, the internal pressure of water is very low and offers no valid explanation for its effect on the Diels-Alder reaction. The internal pressure is defined as the energy required to bring about an infinitesimal change in the volume of the solvents at constant temperature pi = (r)E / Due to the open and... 

In the nonclassical ion controversy discussed in Chapter 9, there was never any question on either side of the debate about the validity of the observed data, only about their interpretation. Had any of the experimental data been questioned or found to be incorrect, this would have been soon found out because so many people repeated and rechecked the data. This is the strength of science (in contrast to politics, economics, etc.), i.e., that we deal with reproducible experimental observation and data. Nevertheless, interpretation can still result in heated discussions or controversies, but science eventually will sort these out based on new results and data. 

When running SCREEN for a point source, or for flare releases and area sources discussed below, you are first asked to provide a one line title (up to 79 characters) that will appear on the output file. You will then be asked to identify the source type, and should enter P or p for a point source (the model will identify either upper or lowercase letters and will repeat the prompt until a valid response is given). For a point source, you will be asked to provide the following inputs ... 

This shows that the presence of air in the gas phase has a very small influence on the vapor pressure of water. Repeating the same calculation procedure for other temperatures, we can show that the vapor pressure of water can with good accuracy be taken from the vapor pressure tables for saturated water (water has the same pressure as water vapor when they are in equilibrium), as though there were no air in the gas phase. So the vapor pressure of water is with good accuracy also in this case just a function of temperature, and Eq. (4.97) is valid. New vapor pressure tables will not be needed for calculations with humid air. 

Where you devise original solutions to the measurement of characteristics the theory and development of the method should be documented and retained as evidence of the validity of the measurement method. Any new measurement methods should be proven by rigorous experiment to detect the measurement uncertainty and cumulative effect of the errors in each measurement process. The samples used for proving the method should also be retained so as to provide a means of repeating the measurements should it prove necessary. 

The title, CHEMISTRY—An Experimental Science, states the theme of this one year course. A clear and valid picture of the steps by which scientists proceed is carefully presented and repeatedly used. Observations and measurements lead to the development of unifying principles... 

A further thirty years were to pass before Kuhn and his co-workers (3) successfully repeated Tswetf s original work and separated lutein and xanthine from a plant extract. Nevertheless, despite the success of Kuhn et al and the validation of Tswett s experiments, the new technique attracted little interest and progress continued to be slow and desultory. In 1941 Martin and Synge (4) introduced liquid-liquid chromatography by supporting the stationary phase, in this case water, on silica in the form of a packed bed and used it to separate some acetyl amino acids. 

---