Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Validation of Density Functionals

Goerigk and Grimme have used the so-called GMTKN30 (main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions) database [20,62] for an extensive benchmark study of close to 50 density functionals and wave-function-based methods including several MP2 variants [80]. [Pg.346]


Munzarova, M., Kaupp, M., 1999, A Critical Validation of Density Functional and Coupled Cluster Approaches for the Calculation for EPR Hyperfine Couphng Constants in Transition Metal Complexes , J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 9966. [Pg.296]

It is apparent that this description of the excited state, which plays such a fundamental role in the photoemission process, brings one outside the realm (and validity) of density functional theory. Now, the construction of the excited final states breaks the translational symmetry of the crystal and so the atom on which the... [Pg.193]

Munzarova M, Kaupp M (1999) A critical validation of density functional and coupled-cluster approaches for the calculation of EPR hyperfine coupling constants in transition metal... [Pg.98]

J.M.L. (2008) Highly accurate first-principles benchmark data sets for the parametrization and validation of density functional and other approximate methods. Derivation of a robust, generally applicable, double-hybrid functional for thermochemistry and thermochemical kinetics.. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 12868-12886. [Pg.370]

The scheme analyzed so far is, in a way, a simplification of the Hartree-Fock scheme. As such, it is only a model approximation. The most serious drawback is the replacement of a fundamentally quantum mechanical term, whose very nature is to be non local, by a local approximation. Of course, when the system is in an electronic degenerate state, or when the BO approximation is no longer valid, the density functional method cannot be applied. For a discussion of this and other limitations the reader is referred to the paper by Bersuker [117],... [Pg.300]

For direct Af-electron variational methods, the computational effort increases so rapidly with increasing N that alternative simplified methods must be used for calculations of the electronic structure of large molecules and solids. Especially for calculations of the electronic energy levels of solids (energy-band structure), the methodology of choice is that of independent-electron models, usually in the framework of density functional theory [189, 321, 90], When restricted to local potentials, as in the local-density approximation (LDA), this is a valid variational theory for any A-electron system. It can readily be applied to heavy atoms by relativistic or semirelativistic modification of the kinetic energy operator in the orbital Kohn-Sham equations [229, 384],... [Pg.93]

We now turn to the reactivity indices defined within the framework of density functional theory (DFT). The validity and applicability of these indices have been discussed in several recent studies by different This is a different way of decom-... [Pg.89]

Systematic analysis of the data with respect to different schemes of density functional calculations given in Table 1 shows clearly that the model core potential (MCP) describing inner electrons in molybdenum gives rise to the results of the same quality as the all-electron calculations. Not only is the use of MCP for heavy atom calculations justified by numerical efficiency but also it may incorporate part of relativistic effects, which may be crucial in describing properties of such atoms. This tendency has been checked and found to be valid also for other states of MoO thus from now on only the frozen core approximation for molybdenum will be presented. [Pg.358]

The B3LYP functional in most cases provides reasonable results. As it has been applied to a large number of different classes of compounds, its strengths and weaknesses are well known. The development of density functionals has been an active field of research for some time, and will probably continue to be so for a number of years. For validation, results obtained with new functionals are often compared with established ones such as B3LYP. Despite numerous new functionals, some of which perform better for specific problems [51, 52, 69], no all-purpose... [Pg.14]

As has been alluded to by mentioning the electronic spin, an extension of density-functional theory to spin-density-functional theory is possible by simply decomposing the total electron density p(r) into the spin densities p r) and p (r) although there are some recent doubts as to the validity of the entire idea [149,150]. In practice, spin-DFT works very well. Spin-DFT is needed whenever the electrons feel an external magnetic field or are subject to spontaneous spin-polarization, such as in magnetic atoms, molecules, and solids (for example, itinerant magnets, see Section 3.5). Spin-DFT also allows different... [Pg.120]

CLASSIFICATION OF DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY POSSIBLY VARIATIONALLY VALID VERSUS HEURISTIC... [Pg.80]

Considering these two drawbacks, the use of Density Functional Theory (DFT) within its Kohn-Sham (KS) formulation is very appealing First, because the cost of a KS-DFT calculation is at most of the same order of magnitude as a Hartree-Fock one, whereas most of the description of electron correlation is taken into account, it is substantially less expensive than traditional correlated techniques. Moreover, most order n methods which are presently under development are all built on the DFT framework. Indeed, in a number of systematic validation studies , DFT has been shown successfully predicting various molecular properties, often giving results of quality comparable to or better than second order Mpller-Plesset (MP2) perturbation theory. It appears more and more evident that the use of DFT techniques could lead to reliable theoretical evaluation of ionization potentials. Moreover, the obtention of new exchange-correlation (XC) functionals is still under development, and one can expect that ionization potentials will be calculated more accurately in a close future. [Pg.92]

For f x) to be a valid probability density function, what is the value of a ... [Pg.246]


See other pages where Validation of Density Functionals is mentioned: [Pg.346]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.4816]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.499]   


SEARCH



Valid function

© 2024 chempedia.info