Valence bonds coupled-cluster theory

A. Baikova and R. J. Bartlett, On the singlet-triplet separation in methylene A critical comparison of single- versus two-determinant (generalized valence bond) coupled cluster theory, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 7116-7123 1995. 

A number of types of calculations begin with a HF calculation and then correct for correlation. Some of these methods are Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MPn, where n is the order of correction), the generalized valence bond (GVB) method, multi-conhgurational self-consistent held (MCSCF), conhgu-ration interaction (Cl), and coupled cluster theory (CC). As a group, these methods are referred to as correlated calculations. 

ACES II Anharmonic Molecular Force Fields Bench-mark Studies on Small Molecules Complete Active Space Self-consistent Field (CASSCF) Second-order Perturbation Theory (CASPT2) Configuration Interaction Core-Valence Correlation Effects Coupled-cluster Theory Density Functional Theory (DFT), Hartree-Fock (HF), and the Self-consistent Field G2 Theory Heats of Formation Hybrid Methods Hydrogen Bonding 1 M0ller-Plesset Perturbation Theory NMR Data Correlation with Chemical Structure Photochemistry Proton Affinities r 2 Dependent Wave-functions Rates of Chemical Reactions Reaction Path Following Reaction Path Hamiltonian and its Use for Investigating Reaction Mechanisms Spectroscopy Computational... 

On the theoretical side the H20-He systems has a sufficiently small number of electrons to be tackled by the most sophisticated quantum-chemical techniques, and in the last two decades several calculations by various methods of electronic structure theory have been attempted [77-80]. More recently, new sophisticated calculations appeared in the literature they exploited combined symmetry - adapted perturbation theory SAPT and CCSD(T), purely ab initio SAPT [81,82], and valence bond methods [83]. A thorough comparison of the topology, the properties of the stationary points, and the anisotropy of potential energy surfaces obtained with coupled cluster, Moller-Plesset, and valence bond methods has been recently presented [83]. 

Computer simulations of excess proton conductivity in water have reached a powerful level [8,92,93,102]. Importantly, simulations extend to quantum-mechanical proton dynamic features, so that proton motion can be coupled to details of the molecular environmental dynamics. A recent feature article explored an analytical theory in order to rationalize these complex processes that involve interconversion of proton-bearing clusters and proton transfers [103]. With a simple two-state empirical valence bond model (see below for details), which implements in a classical way the above-mentioned idea of two limiting protonated structures, namely the 11502 and the H30 cluster, it was indeed observed that the two alternative sequences are equivalent with similar life times for both clusters, and that conversions between the two clusters are purely fluctuative. 

PHF methods can, in turn, be classified as the variational and nonvariational ones. In the former gronp of methods the coefficients in linear combination of Slater determinants and in some cases LCAO coefficients in HF MOs are optimized in the PHF calculations, in the latter such an optimization is absent. To the former group of PHF methods one refers different versions of the configuration interaction (Cl) method, the multi-configuration self-consistent field (MCSCF) method, the variational coupled cluster (CC) approach and the rarely used valence bond (VB) and generaUzed VB methods. The nonvariational PHF methods inclnde the majority of CC reaUza-tions and many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), called in its molecular realization the MoUer-Plessett (MP) method. In MP calculations not only RHF but UHF MOs are also used [107]. 

---