Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Uranium grades

Identification of host minerals in bore-holes (i.e., measurement of uranium grade and type). [Pg.180]

Fig. 2 Uranium grade versus price and different types of uranium resources... Fig. 2 Uranium grade versus price and different types of uranium resources...
Ura.nium, The hydrometallurgical treatment of uranium ores is a concentration and purification process. Typical ore grade is 0.1—0.5% U Og, and pregnant solutions contain ca 1 kg/m of U Og. The dissolution requires the presence of an oxidant, either oxygen or a ferric salt. [Pg.172]

Radiometric ore sorting has been used successfully for some uranium ores because uranium minerals emit gamma rays which may be detected by a scintillation counter (2). In this appHcation, the distribution of uranium is such that a large fraction of the ore containing less than some specified cut-off grade can be discarded with tittle loss of uranium values. Radioactivity can also be induced in certain minerals, eg, boron and beryllium ores, by bombarding with neutrons or gamma rays. [Pg.403]

Domestic. Estimates of U.S. uranium resources for reasonably assured resources, estimated additional resources, and speculative resources at costs of 80, 130, and 260/kg of uranium are given in Table 1 (18). These estimates include only conventional uranium resources, which principally include sandstone deposits of the Colorado Plateaus, the Wyoming basins, and the Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas. Marine phosphorite deposits in central Elorida, the western United States, and other areas contain low grade uranium having 30—150 ppm U that can be recovered as a by-product from wet-process phosphoric acid. Because of relatively low uranium prices, on the order of 20.67/kg U (19), in situ leach and by-product plants accounted for 76% of total uranium production in 1992 (20). [Pg.185]

Once all technical and pohtical problems are resolved, reactor-grade uranium produced from HEU warhead material could contribute significantly to meeting the anticipated fresh uranium production shortfall. This source, however, is not expected to have a significant impact until the year 2000 or later. The discovery of new low cost resources is not expected to make a significant contribution to production until after the year 2005 because of the very low level of uranium exploration and the relatively long lead times required to develop new production centers (29). [Pg.187]

The amount of HEU that becomes avadable for civdian use through the 1990s and into the twenty-first century depends on the number of warheads removed from nuclear arsenals and the amount of HEU in the weapons complex that is already outside of the warheads, ie, materials stockpdes and spent naval reactor fuels. An illustrative example of the potential amounts of weapons-grade materials released from dismanded nuclear weapons is presented in Table 7 (36). Using the data in Table 7, a reduction in the number of warheads in nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia to 5000 warheads for each country results in a surplus of 1140 t of HEU. This inventory of HEU is equivalent to 205,200 t of natural uranium metal, or approximately 3.5 times the 1993 annual demand for natural uranium equivalent. [Pg.188]

A = weapon-grade uranium that would be released from warheads after reducing to warhead number in left-hand column B = value in column A plus weapon-grade uranium already held outside warheads. [Pg.188]

The recycle weapons fuel cycle rehes on the reservoir of SWUs and yellow cake equivalents represented by the fissile materials in decommissioned nuclear weapons. This variation impacts the prereactor portion of the fuel cycle. The post-reactor portion can be either classical or throwaway. Because the avadabihty of weapons-grade fissile material for use as an energy source is a relatively recent phenomenon, it has not been fully implemented. As of early 1995 the United States had purchased highly enriched uranium from Russia, and France had initiated a modification and expansion of the breeder program to use plutonium as the primary fuel (3). AH U.S. reactor manufacturers were working on designs to use weapons-grade plutonium as fuel. [Pg.202]

J. M. Leitnaker, M. L. Smith, md C. M. Fitzpatrick, Conversion of Uranium Nitrate to Ceramic Grade Oxidefor the Eight-Water Breeder Reactor Process Development, ORNL-4755, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Term., 1972. [Pg.208]

Reasonably Assured Resources (RAR) refers to uranium in known mineral deposits of size, grade, and configuration such that recovery is within the given production cost ranges with currentiy proven mining and processing technology. The majority of these resources are found in AustraUa, Brazil,... [Pg.315]

Solvent Extraction. Solvent extraction has widespread appHcation for uranium recovery from ores. In contrast to ion exchange, which is a batch process, solvent extraction can be operated in a continuous countercurrent-fiow manner. However, solvent extraction has a large disadvantage, owing to incomplete phase separation because of solubihty and the formation of emulsions. These effects, as well as solvent losses, result in financial losses and a potential pollution problem inherent in the disposal of spent leach solutions. For leach solutions with a concentration greater than 1 g U/L, solvent extraction is preferred. For low grade solutions with <1 g U/L and carbonate leach solutions, ion exchange is preferred (23). Solvent extraction has not proven economically useful for carbonate solutions. [Pg.317]

Microbiological leaching of copper and uranium has been commercially developed and research has iadicated that microorganisms may be used to oxidize complex antimony sulfide minerals (22,23). If this technology is developed commercially, it may aHow for the exploitation of many low grade antimony deposits. [Pg.196]

As a specific illustration reference may be drawn to molybdenum reserve scenario in the United States. The reserves are mainly grouped under five categories (i) primary, (ii) byproduct of copper ores, (iii) co-product of copper-molybdenum ores, (iv) by-product of tungsten ores, and (v) by-product of uranium ores. These have been presented and briefly elaborated in Table 1.14. It may finally be recorded by way of summary that the present day molybdenum sources in the world today seem to be principally of two main kinds first, the large-tonnage, low-grade, disseminated type of deposit in which molybdenite is the principal economic mineral second, the deposits in which molybdenite occurs as a by-product in... [Pg.63]


See other pages where Uranium grades is mentioned: [Pg.4785]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.4785]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.173]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.337 ]




SEARCH



Residues from Processing of High-Grade Uranium Ore

Uranium weapons-grade

© 2024 chempedia.info