Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Upper-limit distribution function

Mugele and Evans14231 proposed the upper-limit distribution function based on their analyses of various distribution functions and comparisons with experimental data. This distribution function is a modified form of the log-normal distribution function, and for droplet volume distribution it is expressed as ... [Pg.246]

The upper-limit distribution function assumes a finite minimum and maximum droplet size, corresponding to a y value of -oo and +oo, respectively. The function is therefore more realistic. However, similarly to other distribution functions, it is difficult to integrate and requires the use of log-probability paper. In addition, it usually requires many trials to determine a most suitable value for a maximum droplet size. [Pg.247]

Keywords Characteristic drop diameter Cumulative volume fraction Discrete probability function (DPF) Drop size distribution Empirical drop size distribution Log-hyperbolic distribution Log-normal distribution Maximum entropy formalism (MEF) Nukiyama-Tanasawa distribution Number distribution function Probability density function (pdf) Representative diameter Root-normal distribution Rosin-Rammler distribution Upper limit distribution Volume distribution... [Pg.479]

Figure 5.1 The parabolic distribution in energy, N(E), as function of energy, E, for free electrons. The Fermi surface represents the upper limit of electron energy at the absolute zero of temperature, but at higher temperatures a small fraction of the electrons can be excited to higher energy levels... Figure 5.1 The parabolic distribution in energy, N(E), as function of energy, E, for free electrons. The Fermi surface represents the upper limit of electron energy at the absolute zero of temperature, but at higher temperatures a small fraction of the electrons can be excited to higher energy levels...
Water sample collection techniques differ depending on the source being tested. The minimum number of water samples collected from a distribution system which are examined each month for coliforms is a function of the population. For example, the minimum number required for populations of 1,000 and 100,000 are 2 and 100, respectively. To ascertain compliance with the bacteriological requirements of drinking water standards, a certain number of positive tests must not be exceeded. When 10-ml standard portions are examined, not more than 10 percent in any month should be positive (that is, the upper limit of coliform density is an average of one per 100 ml). [Pg.461]

Experiments have been carried out on the mass transfer of acetone between air and a laminar water jet. Assuming that desorption produces random surface renewal with a constant fractional rate of surface renewal, v, but an upper limit on surface age equal to the life of the jet, r, show that the surface age frequency distribution function, 4>(t), for this case is given by ... [Pg.855]

Here the point p belongs to the spherical surface A of radius R. In order to find the upper limit on the left hand side of this equality, let us recall that T is the disturbing potential. In other words, it is caused by the irregular distribution of masses whose sum is equal to zero. This means that its expansion in power series with Legendre s functions does not contain a zero term. The next term is also equal to zero, because the origin coincides with the center of mass. Therefore, the series describing the function T starts from the term, which decreases as r. This means that the product r T O if oo and... [Pg.126]

Thus the mass of stars and that of the whole system steadily increase while z soon approaches 1 and the stellar metallicity distribution is very narrow (see Fig. 8.24). The accretion rate is constant in time if the star formation rate is any fixed function of the mass of gas. Other models in which the accretion rate is constant, but less than in the extreme model, have been quite often considered in the older literature (e.g. Twarog 1980), but are less popular now because they are not well motivated from a dynamical point of view, there is an upper limit to the present inflow rate into the whole Galaxy of about 1 M0yr 1 from X-ray data (Cox Smith 1976) and they do not provide a very good fit to the observed metallicity distribution function. [Pg.277]

In this respect xq is equal to a certain value k which replaces infinity as the upper integral limit in Eq. 2-2. So we can realize that k values depend on probability P. Again the GAUSSian (normal distribution) function is the simplest model function, because of its sole dependence on P which makes k = k(P). [Pg.32]

The corresponding contribution to the radial distribution function can be obtained by means of a Fourier inversion analogous to the one for the experimental data using the same modification function and upper integration limit. [Pg.168]

The Lateral Ignition and Flame spread Test (LIFT) apparatus was developed primarily for lateral flame spread measurements. The apparatus, test procedures, and methods for data analysis are described in ASTM E 1321. A sample of 155 x 800 mm is exposed to the radiant heat of a gas-tired panel. The panel measures 280 x 483 mm. The heat flux is not uniform over the specimen, but varies along the long axis as a function of distance from the hot end as shown in Figure 14.6. The flux distribution is an invariant of distance when normalized to the heat flux at the 50 mm position. When methane or natural gas is burnt, the upper limit of the radiant heat flux is 60-65 kW/m2. The lower limit is approximately 10kW/m2 since the porous ceramic tile surface of the panel is only partly covered with flame at lower heat fluxes. [Pg.361]

It will be noted that in this definition rf is a dummy variable and the integral is a function of its upper limit. When the definition of the error function is inserted in Eq. (4-8), the expression for the temperature distribution becomes... [Pg.137]

The wide distribution of PKSs in the microbial world and the extreme chemical diversity of their products do in fact result from a varied use of the well-known catalytic domains described above for the canonical PKS systems. Taking a theoretic view of polyketide diversity, Gonzalez-Lergier et al. (41) have suggested that even if the starter and extender units are fixed, over 100,000 linear heptaketide structures are possible using only the 5 common reductive outcomes at the P-carbon position (ketone, (R- or S-) alcohol, trans-double bond, or alkane). Recently, it has become apparent that even this does not represent the upper limit for polyketide diversification. To create chemical functionalities beyond those mentioned above, nature has recruited some enzymes from sources other than fatty acid synthesis (the mevalonate pathway in primary metabolism is one example) not typically thought of as type I PKS domains. Next, we explore the ways PKS-containing systems have modified these domains for the catalysis of some unique chemistries observed in natural products. [Pg.1530]


See other pages where Upper-limit distribution function is mentioned: [Pg.242]    [Pg.1370]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.1294]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.2012]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.2792]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.246 ]




SEARCH



Distribution limiting

Function limit

Upper Limit

Upper function

Upper limit distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info