Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Unitary limit

Taking the unitary limit in (17) it would appear as if every term in the series vanishes. However, when the series is terminated at m = mo [Kulic and Dolgov, 1999], one finds Xai-i = — 2), independent of mo- The approach... [Pg.155]

Fig. 53. Normalised quasiparticle DOS for s + g wave gap in pure YNi2B2C ( = 0, full line) and for various scattering strengths F in the Bom limit (for unitary limit results are quite similar). Induced excitation gap cog increases monotonically with F. The inset shows the low temperature specific heat (Yuan et al., 2003). Fig. 53. Normalised quasiparticle DOS for s + g wave gap in pure YNi2B2C ( = 0, full line) and for various scattering strengths F in the Bom limit (for unitary limit results are quite similar). Induced excitation gap cog increases monotonically with F. The inset shows the low temperature specific heat (Yuan et al., 2003).
With respect to the electrical resistivity, the Kondo temperature roughly separates a high temperature region (T S> Tg) where the resistivity varies linearly with the logarithm of the temperature, and a low temperature region (T < Tn) where the resistivity saturates to the so-called unitary limit as T O. For temperatures well above Tg, the magnetic susceptibility resembles a Curie-Weiss law with a Curie-Weiss temperature which is of the order of several times Tg, whereas for temperatures well below Tg, the susceptibility exhibits at most a weak temperature dependence and approaches a finite value as T O. The specific heat and thermoelectric power exhibit broad maxima as a function of temperature which peak in the vicinity of Tg. [Pg.798]

On the other hand, the substitution of Zn (content 1%) showed Tc 79K, and the gap value 2App w 50 meV was almost the same value as that of the pure sample. However, the conductance at zero bias was increased. This increase, estimated to a residual DOS of 0.4, was in good agreement with the results of NMR experiments (Ishida et al. 1993). Their results were compared with theoretical results of impurity effects in d-wave superconductors in the unitary limit (Balatsky and Salkola 1996, Salkola et al. 1996), though they did not claim that the zero-bias anomaly observed in Zn-substituted Bi2212 is explained by their prediction. These variations in the substituent atoms seem to indicate that Co, Zn and Ni affect the electronic states in different ways. [Pg.594]

Turning now to the non-ideal solution, we may answer question (1) by saying that the value of (163) will vary with concentration only insofar as the solution differs from an ideal solution and we can proceed to ask a third question how would the value of (163) vary with concentration for an ionic solution in the extremely dilute range We must answer that in a series of extremely dilute solutions the value of (163) would be constant within the experimental error it is, in fact, a unitary quantity, characteristic of the solute dissolving in the given solvent. As in See. 55, this constant value adopted by (163) in extremely dilute solutions may conveniently be written as the limiting value as x tends to zero thus... [Pg.179]

A complete unitary space is called a Hilbert space. The unitary spaces of finite dimension are necessarily complete. For reasons of completeness the vector space of all n-tuplets of rational numbers is not a Hilbert space, since it is not complete. For instance, it is possible to define a sequence of rational numbers that approaches the irrational number y/2 as a limit. The set of all rational numbers therefore does not define a Hilbert space. Similar arguments apply to the set of all n-tuplets of rational numbers. [Pg.66]

When studying the border of universality, we always need to consider the limit of large graphs, that is, ue —> oo. This limit is in general not well defined, but may often be obvious from the examples considered. We will thus define the semiclassical limit loosely via a family of unitary-stochastic transition matrices Tn and associate USE s and take ue —> oo. The leading term in (13) then gives a condition for a family to show deviations from RMT statistics in terms of the spectrum of T the diagonal term must obey... [Pg.85]

In the previous discussion the semiclassical separation of particles and antiparticles employed projection operators and the associated subspaces of the Hilbert space. By suitable choices of bases such a separation can also be constructed with the help of unitary operators rotating the Hamiltonian into a block-diagonal form. Such a procedure is closely analogous to the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation that provides a similar separation in a non-relati-vistic limit. A (unitary) semiclassical Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation Usc rotates the Dirac-Hamiltonian Hd into... [Pg.102]

We now consider how to eliminate the spin-orbit interaction, but not scalar relativistic effects, from the Dirac equation (25). The straightforward elimination of spin-dependent terms, taken to be terms involving the Pauli spin matrices, certainly does not work as it eliminates all kinetic energy as well. A minimum requirement for a correct procedure for the elimination of spin-orbit interaction is that the remaining operator should go to the correct non-relativistic limit. However, this check does not guarantee that some scalar relativistic effects are eliminated as well, as pointed out by Visscher and van Lenthe [44]. Dyall [12] suggested the elimination of the spin-orbit interaction by the non-unitary transformation... [Pg.392]

Figure 8.20 Eh-pH diagram for the Ce-H20 system (modified from Pourbaix, 1966). Figures on limiting curves are base 10 logarithms of solute activity unitary activity (i.e., one-molal solution) is identified by zero. Figure 8.20 Eh-pH diagram for the Ce-H20 system (modified from Pourbaix, 1966). Figures on limiting curves are base 10 logarithms of solute activity unitary activity (i.e., one-molal solution) is identified by zero.
FFF selectivities assume limiting values at high retention level for sedimentation FFF (SdFFF), 5j=3, whereas S nj= 1 for flow FFF (FIFFF), the limiting value of 5 is unitary. For ThFFF, the 5 of dissolved polymers depends on the polymer-solvent system with typical values in the 0.5-0.7 range. In ThFFF particle separation, a wide range of values have been reported [3],... [Pg.338]

To restore the destroyed dipole, the operator must input as much energy as was required to destroy it. But with the closed current loop circuit, this operator input a priori is greater than the useful output of work in the load. Hence the coefficient of performance (COP) of this closed current loop system (with unitary m/q of the charge carriers) is self-limited to COP < 1.0. [Pg.668]

Again the situation is much simpler when only asymptotic states containing stable particles are considered. Then unstable particles enter neither into the completeness relation nor into the unitary relations of the theory.5 However, in the intermediate states unstable particles may appear. They manifest themselves as poles exactly as in Eq, (16). We may then describe such poles by various approximate formulas of the Breit-Wigner type. But again this approach is severely limited. By definition we have to exclude the production or destruction processes involving unstable particles. It is even not easily seen how this can be done in a consistent manner. [Pg.20]

In the previous section we have dealt with a simple, but nevertheless physically rich, model describing the interaction of an electronic level with some specific vibrational mode confined to the quantum dot. We have seen how to apply in this case the Keldysh non-equilibrium techniques described in Section III within the self-consistent Born and Migdal approximations. The latter are however appropriate for the weak coupling limit to the vibrational degrees of freedom. In the opposite case of strong coupling, different techniques must be applied. For equilibrium problems, unitary transformations combined with variational approaches can be used, in non-equilibrium only recently some attempts were made to deal with the problem. [139]... [Pg.312]

In this section we will consider the case of a multi-level electronic system in interaction with a bosonic bath [288,289], We will use unitary transformation techniques to deal with the problem, but will only focus on the low-bias transport, so that strong non-equilibrium effects can be disregarded. Our interest is to explore how the qualitative low-energy properties of the electronic system are modified by the interaction with the bosonic bath. We will see that the existence of a continuum of vibrational excitations (up to some cut-off frequency) dramatically changes the analytic properties of the electronic Green function and may lead in some limiting cases to a qualitative modification of the low-energy electronic spectrum. As a result, the I-V characteristics at low bias may display metallic behavior (finite current) even if the isolated electronic system does exhibit a band gap. The model to be discussed below... [Pg.312]

A fundamental limitation to coherent population control is that it is impossible to transfer 100% of the population in a mixed state. That is, the maximum value of the population transferred cannot exceed the maximum of the initial population distribution of a system without any dissipative process such as spontaneous emission. This result can be simply verified using the unitary property of the density operator, pit) = U(t, to)pito)U t, to), where p(to) is the diagonalized density operator at t = to, Uit, to) is the time-evolution operator given by... [Pg.161]

As mentioned in section 8.1, the value of the unitary chemical potential pi depends on the choice of the reference system. There are two reference systems which are commonly used one is unsymmetrical and the other is symmetrical. In discussing the reference systems we shall for convenience limit ourselves to a binary solution. [Pg.75]

It can be seen that amounts of up to a few grams can be converted in 5-10 h in the case of complete absorption and unitary quantum yield (ignoring any internal filter effect). Lower quantum yields or an incomplete absorption proportionally lengthens the time required for the transformation. It is most likely safe to say that exploratory reactions on the 100 mg scale can be carried out in a reasonable time, provided that > 0.1-0.05. Even reactions with a quantum yield at the lower limit or below may be interesting for a preparation if the reaction is clean. Given the minimal safety... [Pg.18]


See other pages where Unitary limit is mentioned: [Pg.297]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.32]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.166 , Pg.283 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info