Twist/bend director

Mode 2 twist/bend director confined to the y-z ( 2- o) plane. 

Here, a = 1,2 denotes the splay-bend and twist-bend mode, respectively, i i,2,3 are the Prank elastic constants, 771 2 are the rotational viscosities, is the component of the fluctuation wave vector parallel to the director and q the component perpendicular to it. 

Fig. 8.10 New coordinate axes, ej and 62 appropriate to the normal modes of director fluctuations in a nematic liquid crystal (a) and the structure of the normal modes, namely splay-bend (SB) and twist-bend modes (TB)...

FIGURE 7 Twist-bend periodic instability reported by Lonberg et al. [141. The lines indicate the director field on a series of planes parallel to the substrates that begin and end on the two substrates. The initial director field is along n . (Adapted from Ref. 14.)... 

These orientations are classified into two groups. The directors of the liquid crystal molecules in the Homogeneous, Tilted and Homeotropic cases are aligned in one fixed direction, while, the director of the liquid crystal molecules in the Splay, Twist, Bend, Hybrid and Super-twisted nematic cases are not fixed in one direction. In the latter orientations, the liquid crystals are under stress. 

Figure 16. Deformations of director for splay, twist, bend.

The de Gennes formulae [28, 29] establish a relation between the elastic coefficients and the scattering intensities. Small thermal director fluctuations can be expressed in terms of two eigenmodes, the splay-bend mode Srii and the twist-bend mode Sn2. The equipartition theorem gives the intensities... 

Figure 41. Model of the director configuration in a helical smectic C. To the left is shown a single layer. When such layers are successively added to each other, with the tilt direction shifted hy the same amount every time, we obtain a space-filling twist-bend structure with a bend direction rotating continuously from layer to layer. This bend is coupled, by the flexoelectric effect, to an equally rotating dipole.

Illxistration of deformation of layered structures, (a) Layer splay (director bend) (b) twist (c) layer bend (director splay). It can be seen that only the layer bend leaves the layer spacing constant. 

Figure C2.2.11. (a) Splay, (b) twist and (c) bend defonnations in a nematic liquid crystal. The director is indicated by a dot, when nonnal to the page. The corresponding Frank elastic constants are indicated (equation(C2.2.9)).

Figure C2.2.12. A Freedericksz transition involving splay and bend. This is sometimes called a splay defonnation, but only becomes purely splay in the limit of infinitesimal displacements of the director from its initial position [106]. The other two Freedericksz geometries ( bend and twist ) are described in the text.

For a nematic LC, the preferred orientation is one in which the director is parallel everywhere. Other orientations have a free-energy distribution that depends on the elastic constants, K /. The orientational elastic constants K, K22 and K33 determine respectively splay, twist and bend deformations. Values of elastic constants in LCs are around 10 N so that free-energy difference between different orientations is of the order of 5 x 10 J m the same order of magnitude as surface energy. A thin layer of LC sandwiched between two aligned surfaces therefore adopts an orientation determined by the surfaces. This fact forms the basis of most electrooptical effects in LCs. Display devices based on LCs are discussed in Chapter 7. 

Fig. 17a-c. Elastic constants for a splay b twist c bend deformations of a nematic phase. The full lines represent the director... 

The three elastic constants are the Frank elastic constants, called after Frank, who introduced them already in 1958. They originate from the deformation of the director field as shown in Fig. 15.52. A continuous small deformation of an oriented material can be distinguished into three basis distortions splay, twist and bend distortions They are required to describe the resistance offered by the nematic phase to orientational distortions. As an example, values for Miesowicz viscosities and Frank elastic constants are presented in Table 15.10. It should be mentioned that those material constants are not known for many LCs and LCPs. Nevertheless, they have to be substituted in specific rheological constitutive equations in order to describe the rheological peculiarities of LCPs. Accordingly, the viscosity and the dynamic moduli will be functions of the Miesowicz viscosities and/or the Frank elastic constants. Several theories have been presented that are more or less able to explain the rheological peculiarities. Well-known are the Leslie-Ericksen theory and the Larson-Doi theory. It is far beyond the scope of this book to go into detail of these theories. The reader is referred to, e.g. Aciemo and Collyer (General References, 1996). 

The spatial and temporal response of a nematic phase to a distorting force, such as an electric (or magnetic) field is determined in part by three elastic constants, kii, k22 and associated with splay, twist and bend deformations, respectively, see Figure 2.9. The elastic constants describe the restoring forces on a molecule within the nematic phase on removal of some external force which had distorted the nematic medium from its equilibrium, i.e. lowest energy conformation. The configuration of the nematic director within an LCD in the absence of an applied field is determined by the interaction of very thin layers of molecules with an orientation layer coating the surface of the substrates above the electrodes. The direction imposed on the director at the surface is then... 

Here u is the position of a layer plane and z is the position coordinate locally parallel to the director n, where n is parallel to the average molecular axis, which is assumed to remain normal to the layer plane, du/dz = e is the compressional (or dilational) strain. Thus, layer bending and layer compression are characterized by a splay (or layer-bend) modulus K and a compression modulus B. Other kinds of distortion present in nematics, such as bend or twisting of the director n, are not compatible with layers that remain nearly parallel, and hence are forbidden. Equation (10-36) is not invariant to rotations of frame, and its validity is limited to weak distortions a rotationally invariant expression has been given by -Grinstein and Pelcovits (1981).---------------------------------------------------------... 

Because of the difficulty with which polymeric nematic monodomains are prepared, there are few measurements of Leslie viscosities and Frank constants for LCPs reported in the literature. The most complete data sets are for PBG solutions, reported by Lee and Meyer (1990), who dissolved the polymer in a mixed solvent of 18% dioxane and 82% dichloromethane with a few percent added dimethylformamide. Some of these data, measured by light scattering and by the response of the nematic director to an applied magnetic field, are shown in Figs. 11-19 and 11-20 and in Table 11-1. While the twist constant has a value of around K2 0.6 x 10 dyn, which is believed to be roughly independent of concentration and molecular weight, the splay and bend constants ATj and K3 are sensitive to concentration and molecular weight. 

The liquid crystals can be deformed by applying external fields. Even a small electric or magnetic field, shear force, surface anchoring, etc., is able to make significant distortion or deformation to liquid crystals. Thus, n is actually a function of position r. According to the symmetry of liquid crystals there exist three kinds of deformations in liquid crystals splay, twist and bend deformations, shown in Figure 1.17. The short bars in the figure represent the projections of the local directors. 

The strain increases the energy of the solid as a stress is applied. The distortion of the director in liquid crystals causes an additional energy in a similar way. The energy is proportional to the square of the deformations and the correspondent coefficients are defined as the splay elastic constant, K, twisted elastic constant K22 and bend elastic constant Kx, i.e., the respective energies are the half of... 

Figure 6.9. The director fluctuation causes light scattering (a) two independent fluctuation modes 8n and <5ri2 (b) two components in 8n splay and bend and (c) two components of <5n2 bend and twist. (Modified from DuPre, 1982.)...

Here nd are elastic constants. The first, is associated with a splay deformation, K2 is associated with a twist deformation and with bend (figure C2.2.11). These three elastic constants are termed the Frank elastic constants of a nematic phase. Since they control the variation of the director orientation, they influence the scattering of light by a nematic and so can be determined from light-scattering experiments. Other techniques exploit electric or magnetic field-induced transitions in well-defined geometries (Freedericksz transitions, see section (C2.2.4.1I [20, M]. 

Here K, K2 and iTs are elastic moduli associated with the three elementary types of deformations splay, twist and bend, respectively. Though the three elastic moduli are of the same order of magnitude the ordering K2 < K < K3 holds for most nematics. As a consequence of the orientational elasticity a local restoring torque (later referred to as elastic torque) acts on the distorted director field which tends to reduce the spatial variations. 

Such walls are associated with the Freedericksz deformation. With the homeotropic geometry of Fig. 3.4.1 (c), the possible distortions for H> are illustrated in fig. 3.S. 16. Since the director tilt has a degeneracy in sign with respect to H, there can arise twist walls parallel to the field (fig. 3.5.16(6)) or splay walls perpendicular to the field (fig. 3.5.16(c)). Similarly with the homogeneous geometry, there can arise bend walls. 

---