Transition state theory corrections

Transition state theory is based on the assumption of a dynamical bottleneck. The dynamical bottleneck assumption would be perfect, at least in classical mechanics, if the reaction coordinate were separable. Then one could find a dividing surface separating reactants from products that is not recrossed by any trajectories in phase space. Conventional transition state theory assumes that the unbound normal mode of the saddle point provides such a separable reaction coordinate, but dividing surfaces defined with this assumption often have significant recrossing corrections. Variational transition state theory corrects this problem, eliminating most of the recrossing. 

The quasi-equilibrium assumption in the above canonical fonn of the transition state theory usually gives an upper bound to the real rate constant. This is sometimes corrected for by multiplying (A3.4.98) and (A3.4.99) with a transmission coefifiwient 0 < k < 1. 

Voth G A, Chandler D and Miller W H 1989 Rigorous formulation of quantum transition state theory and its dynamical corrections J. Chem. Phys. 91 7749... 

Examining transition state theory, one notes that the assumptions of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are not completely correct because some of the molecules reaching the activation energy will react, lose excess vibrational energy, and not be able to go back to reactants. Also, some molecules that have reacted may go back to reactants again. 

Transition state theory calculations present slightly fewer technical difficulties. However, the accuracy of these calculations varies with the type of reaction. With the addition of an empirically determined correction factor, these calculations can be the most readily obtained for a given class of reactions. 

The assumptions of transition state theory allow for the derivation of a kinetic rate constant from equilibrium properties of the system. That seems almost too good to be true. In fact, it sometimes is [8,18-21]. Violations of the assumptions of TST do occur. In those cases, a more detailed description of the system dynamics is necessary for the accurate estimate of the kinetic rate constant. Keck [22] first demonstrated how molecular dynamics could be combined with transition state theory to evaluate the reaction rate constant (see also Ref. 17). In this section, an attempt is made to explain the essence of these dynamic corrections to TST. 

When processes are slow because they involve an activation barrier, the time scale problems can be circumvented by applying (corrected) transition state theory. This is certainly useful for reactive systems (5 ) requiring a quantummechanical approach to define the reaction path in a reduced system of coordinates. The development in these fields is only beginning and a very promising... 

Quantum mechanical effects—tunneling and interference, resonances, and electronic nonadiabaticity— play important roles in many chemical reactions. Rigorous quantum dynamics studies, that is, numerically accurate solutions of either the time-independent or time-dependent Schrodinger equations, provide the most correct and detailed description of a chemical reaction. While hmited to relatively small numbers of atoms by the standards of ordinary chemistry, numerically accurate quantum dynamics provides not only detailed insight into the nature of specific reactions, but benchmark results on which to base more approximate approaches, such as transition state theory and quasiclassical trajectories, which can be applied to larger systems. 

Transition state theory and corrections for hydrogen tunnelling... 

Arrhenius proposed his equation in 1889 on empirical grounds, justifying it with the hydrolysis of sucrose to fructose and glucose. Note that the temperature dependence is in the exponential term and that the preexponential factor is a constant. Reaction rate theories (see Chapter 3) show that the Arrhenius equation is to a very good approximation correct however, the assumption of a prefactor that does not depend on temperature cannot strictly be maintained as transition state theory shows that it may be proportional to 7. Nevertheless, this dependence is usually much weaker than the exponential term and is therefore often neglected. 

The rate of hydrogen transfer can be calculated using the direct dynamics approach of Truhlar and co-workers which combines canonical variational transition state theory (CVT) [82, 83] with semi-classical multidimensional tunnelling corrections [84], The rate constant is calculated using [83] ... 

Finally in Table 4 we collect together the expressions for the different rate constants that we have derived for the different reactions considered in this review. It can be seen that transition-state theory, coupled with diffusion, can provide a satisfactory theoretical framework for a wide range of different reactions, providing that the correct frequency factor is used. 

Three possibilities were considered to account for the curved Arrhenius plots and unusual KIEs (a) the 1,2-H shift might feature a variational transition state due to the low activation energy (4.9 kcal/mol60) and quite negative activation entropy (b) MeCCl could react by two or more competing pathways, each with a different activation energy (e.g., 1,2-H shift and azine formation by reaction with the diazirine precursor) (c) QMT could occur.60 The first possibility was discounted because calculations by Storer and Houk indicated that the 1,2-H shift was adequately described by conventional transition state theory.63 Option (b) was excluded because the Arrhenius curvature persisted after correction of the 1,2-H shift rate constants for the formation of minor side products (azine).60... 

Second, in deriving Equation 16.2 from transition state theory, it is necessary to assume that the overall reaction proceeds on a molecular scale as a single elementary reaction or a series of elementary reactions (e.g., Lasaga, 1984 Nagy et al., 1991). In general, the elementary reactions that occur as a mineral dissolves and precipitates are not known. Thus, even though the form of Equation 16.2 is convenient and broadly applicable for explaining experimental results, it is not necessarily correct in the strictest sense. 

If only the solvation of the gas-phase stationary points are studied, we are working within the frame of the Conventional Transition State Theory, whose problems when used along with the solvent equilibrium hypothesis have already been explained above. Thus, the set of Monte Carlo solvent configurations generated around the gas-phase transition state structure does not probably contain the real saddle point of the whole system, this way not being a correct representation of the conventional transition state of the chemical reaction in solution. However, in spite of that this elemental treatment... 

Abstract Some of the successes and several of the inadequacies of transition state theory (TST) as applied to kinetic isotope effects are briefly discussed. Corrections for quantum mechanical tunneling are introduced. The bulk of the chapter, however, deals with the more sophisticated approach known as variational transition state theory (VTST). 

This is, not surprisingly, nearly identical to the Landau-Zener corrected transition state theory above (Eq. 6) exact equivalence is obtained if the transition state theory prefactor is taken to be (co/ti) rather than Eyring s (hgT/h), and the numerical difference between these two conceptually different prefactors [49] is often small enough as to be of little experimental consequence. 

Fortunately, it is relatively simple to estimate from harmonic transition-state theory whether quantum tunneling is important or not. Applying multidimensional transition-state theory, Eq. (6.15), requires finding the vibrational frequencies of the system of interest at energy minimum A (v, V2,. . . , vN) and transition state (vj,. v, , ). Using these frequencies, we can define the zero-point energy corrected activation energy ... 

A final complication with the version of transition-state theory we have used is that it is based on a classical description of the system s energy. But as we discussed in Section 5.4, the minimum energy of a configuration of atoms should more correctly be defined using the classical minimum energy plus a zero-point energy correction. It is not too difficult to incorporate this idea into transition-state theory. The net result is that Eq. (6.15) should be modified... 

If we are lucky, frequency factor predictions from either collision or transition-state theory may come within a factor of 100 of the correct value however, in specific cases predictions may be much further off. 

In the very short time limit, q (t) will be in the reactants region if its velocity at time t = 0 is negative. Therefore the zero time limit of the reactive flux expression is just the one dimensional transition state theory estimate for the rate. This means that if one wants to study corrections to TST, all one needs to do munerically is compute the transmission coefficient k defined as the ratio of the numerator of Eq. 14 and its zero time limit. The reactive flux transmission coefficient is then just the plateau value of the average of a unidirectional thermal flux. Numerically it may be actually easier to compute the transmission coefficient than the magnitude of the one dimensional TST rate. Further refinements of the reactive flux method have been devised recently in Refs. 31,32 these allow for even more efficient determination of the reaction rate. 

---