Transition elements covalent compounds

As a univalent ion of medium size, CN , in simple compounds like K+CN , behaves as a chlorine ion, especially if the positive ion has a rare-gas or an 18-electron structure, and covalent bonds cannot be formed. If, however, the positive ion is one of the transition elements, covalent bonds are formed by the lone electron-pair of the CN ion. 

Almost simultaneous with the publication of Kossel s paper there appeared a rival electronic theory. The American chemist Lewis introduced the idea of the covalent electron-pair bond. Like Kossel, he was impressed by the apparent stability of the noble gas configuration. He was also impressed by the fact that, apart from many compounds of the transition elements, most compounds when rendered as molecules have even numbers of electrons, suggesting that electrons are usually found in pairs. Lewis devised the familiar representations of molecules and polyatomic ions (Lewis structures, or Lewis diagrams) in which electrons are shown as dots (or as noughts and crosses) to show how atoms can attain noble gas configurations by the sharing of electrons in pairs, as opposed to complete transfer as in Kossel s theory. It was soon apparent from the earliest X-ray studies that Kossel s theory was more appropriate... 

Attempts to classify carbides according to structure or bond type meet the same difficulties as were encountered with hydrides (p. 64) and borides (p. 145) and for the same reasons. The general trends in properties of the three groups of compounds are, however, broadly similar, being most polar (ionic) for the electropositive metals, most covalent (molecular) for the electronegative non-metals and somewhat complex (interstitial) for the elements in the centre of the d block. There are also several elements with poorly characterized, unstable, or non-existent carbides, namely the later transition elements (Groups 11 and 12), the platinum metals, and the post transition-metal elements in Group 13. 

The Niccolite Structure. The substances which crystallize with the niccolite structure (B8) are compounds of transition elements with S, Se, Te, As, Sb, Bi, or Sn. The physical properties of the substances indicate that the crystals are not ionic, and this is substantiated by the lack of agreement with the structural rules for ionic crystals. Thus each metal atom is surrounded by an octahedron of non-metal atoms but these octahedra share faces, and the edges of the shared faces are longer than other edges (rather than shorter, as in ionic crystals). Hence we conclude that the bonds are covalent, with probably some metallic character also. 

The systematic investigation of the chemistry of the transition elements began in the nineteenth century, and it rapidly became apparent that many of the compounds were somewhat different from those with which chemists were then familiar. There was a clear difference between the behaviour of simple ionic compounds such as sodium chloride and typical transition-element compounds such as FeCl2-4H20. It was also obvious that the compounds did not resemble the typically covalent compounds of organic chemistry. It was considered that many of the compounds formed by transition metals were of a complex constitution, and they were accordingly known as complexes. 

For transition elements, purely covalent bonds exhibit a resistance in the limit 2.694-2.983 (Fig. 3.1). Compounds of this type have very few repre-... 

Of the linear clusters, the organogermanium-substituted transition metal carbonyl compounds are the simplest. In every case, the coordination at germanium is tetrahedral, while the transition element retains the geometry of the parent carbonyl compound (50,108,119,155, 157, 181). The Ge—M bond is almost without exception shorter than the sum of the Ge—M covalent radii (Table VI), which is cited as evidence for (d — d)-n multiple bonding. 

In chemical compounds and minerals containing transition elements, Racah B parameters are decreased relative to the ffee-ion values. This implies that both the mean radial displacement of 3d electrons has increased and the effective charge experienced by the electrons has decreased when a transition metal is bonded to ligands in a coordination site. Since the Racah B parameter is always smaller than the free-ion value it is used as a qualitative measure of bond covalency. 

The covalent radii of transition elements are subject to two additional effects that influence the values of ionic radii also. A large covalent radius for a given atom is favored by both a low oxidation number and a high coordination number. These two effects are independent neither of each other nor of bond order effects however, an adequate unified treatment of the interrelationships between bond number, coordination number, oxidation number, and bond distances for compounds of the transition metals is best postponed to a more advanced text. 

It therefore seems quite natural to choose silica, silica aluminas, and aluminium oxide as the objects of the first systematical quantum-chemical calculations. These compounds do not contain transition elements. They are built of the individual structural fragments primary, secondary, etc. This enables one to find the most suitable cluster models for quantum-chemical computations. The covalent nature of these structures again makes quite efficient a comparatively simple method of taking into account the boundary conditions in the cluster calculations. Finally, these systems demonstrate clearly defined Bronsted and Lewis acidity. This range of questions comprises the subject of the present review. This does not by any means imply that there are no quantum-chemical computations on the cluster models of the surface active sites of transition element oxides. It would be more proper to say that the few works of this type represent rather preliminary attempts, being far from systematic studies. Also, many of them unfortunately include some disputable points both in the statement of the problem and in the procedure of calculations. In our opinion, the situation is such that it is still unreasonable to try to summarize the results obtained, and therefore this matter is not reviewed in the present article. 

In the simplest CF approach, the ligands are represented by negative point charges. No covalency is explicitly considered, so that the bonding is deemed to be ionic this may seem unduly simplistic, but CFT does not purport to be a theory of bonding in compounds of the transition elements. In a quantitative treatment, the array of point charges around the central ion is formulated as an electrostatic potential, the crystal field, whose effect on the nd subshell can be calculated by means of perturbation theory. Here we give only a qualitative treatment. 

The atomic and ionic properties of an element, particularly IE, ionic radius and electronegativity, underly its chemical behaviour and determine the types of compound it can form. The simplest type of compound an element can form is a binary compound, one in which it is combined with only one other element. The transition elements form binary compounds with a wide variety of non-metals, and the stoichiometries of these compounds will depend upon the thermodynamics of the compound-forming process. Binary oxides, fluorides and chlorides of the transition elements reveal the oxidation states available to them and, to some extent, reflect trends in IE values. However, the lEs of the transition elements are by no means the only contributors to the thermodynamics of compound formation. Other factors such as lattice enthalpy and the extent of covalency in bonding are important. In this chapter some examples of binary transition element compounds will be used to reveal the factors which determine the stoichiometry of compounds. 

Directional natiire oj bonds involving d orbitals— The atoms of the transition elements may take part in both c and n bonds in the formation of a compound. The number of a bonds formed by the central atom cannot exceed the number of surrounding atoms or groups since between any pair of atoms, only one a bond is permissible, but the number of less than the number of neighbours, since bonds other than the covalent are possible, e.g, bonds due to ion-dipole and dispersion forces. 

---