Total logistics costs

As mentioned before, management wanted to decrease total logistics costs by reducing warehouses. A consolidated network would reduce inventory levels and other associated costs. Transportation costs could increase since it was estimated that there would be a trade-off in this case between less critical next-day tiir shipments and stock transfer shipments but more direct and smaller customer shipments. 

It is estimated that around 90 % of global demand is not fully satisfied by local supply [2]. The cost of logistics on a global scale is estimated to exceed 8 trillion a year [2]. The authors report experts agree that logistics expenditures in the United States in 2007 were around 10.1 % of the 13.84 billion GDP. Transportation costs were 61.3 % of the total logistics cost. 

Suppose Optima were to replace full truckloads by optimal shipment sizes. How would the optimal shipment sizes be determined Given the symbolic description earlier, consider the expression for the total logistics cost for a component from its component plant to the assembly plant. 

Figure 2.11 shows the three components of the total logistics cost. Given the shape of these costs, the optimal shipment size calculated above, if feasible, is the one at which the average transport cost equals the average holding cost. The corresponding shipment quantity is obtained as... 

Holding cost at Chicago is also 0.40 per component per day. Provide the total logistics costs for this logistics system. 

Total logistics costs It refers the total costs associated with logistics components from the point of origin to the point of care (discuss with expats). 

For scenarios 1 and 2 are obtained US 30,905,397 and US 49,746,778 of the average total logistics cost and US 288,393 and US 288,004 of standard deviation, respectively. Considering fair distribution Irom the first time (scenario 1) could save almost 40 % of disaster response operation budget comparing to give the penalty to unfair distribution later (scenario 2. ... 

Total logistics costs associated with the existing systems, including the inbound and outbound transportation costs, direct and indirect warehouse and distribution center operating costs, capital... 

Reducing total logistics costs through much greater efficiency in storage, shipment, and use of equipment... 

Consolidate Comparison of the total logistics costs and service levels for each... 

Despite these recent studies, a critical gap in the literature remains in assessing the trade-offs between supply chain efficiency (i.e., total logistics costs) and supply chain responsiveness (i.e., supply delivery time, demand fulfillment) for aerial delivery operations in the entire military HA/DR supply chain network. None of these previous studies considered the delivery of HA/DR consumable aid via aerial delivery mechanisms. Further, none of these previous studies considered the trade-offs of response time, total cost, and amount of demand satisfied. Therefore, we seek to fill the gap in the literature while providing military HA/DR decision makers with strategic decision support using a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. 

Setting up a supplier association was viewed as the best way to address the needs and timescales for changing the supply chain. Suppliers could be involved simultaneously in reducing lead times from 2 weeks to 2 days (receipt of order from TELE to delivery at end user s site). This would be achieved through improved responsiveness, both inbound and outbound. Far Eastern competitors would be unable to match such service levels and total logistics costs. 

Total logistics costs are the sum of the inventory, transportation, and facility costs. The facilities in a supply chain network should at least equal the number that minimizes total logistics cost. A firm may increase the number of facihties beyond this point to improve the response time to its customers. This decision is justified if the revenue increase from improved response outweighs the increased cost from additional facihties. 

To test the reasonableness of our model, we calculated the aimual cost for operating the two networks independently vrithout any form of collaboration and compared it to publicly reported data on the mix of distribution cost. As shovm on the left hand side of Fig. 2, costs for our base case scenario total 413 million per year driven primarily by transportation cost. The mix of costs compares well to the split that exists for total logistics costs throughout the United States (Wilson and Delaney, 2001) shown on the right-hand side of Fig. 2. 

---