Time domain instruments

In contrast, time domain instruments attempt to directly measure the decay characteristics of a fluorophore of interest by excitation with ultrashort light pulses and monitoring the decay using either TCSPC [5] or a time gated image intensifier [8],... 

At the present time, two methods are in common use for the determination of time-resolved anisotropy parameters—the single-photon counting or pulse method 55-56 and the frequency-domain or phase fluorometric methods. 57 59) These are described elsewhere in this series. Recently, both of these techniques have undergone considerable development, and there are a number of commercially available instruments which include analysis software. The question of which technique would be better for the study of membranes is therefore difficult to answer. Certainly, however, the multifrequency phase instruments are now fully comparable with the time-domain instruments, a situation which was not the case only a few years ago. Time-resolved measurements are generally rather more difficult to perform and may take considerably longer than the steady-state anisotropy measurements, and this should be borne in mind when samples are unstable or if information of kinetics is required. It is therefore important to evaluate the need to take such measurements in studies of membranes. Steady-state instruments are of course much less expensive, and considerable information can be extracted, although polarization optics are not usually supplied as standard. 

Optical tomography techniques for human medicine are currently at the stage of clinical tests [204, 225, 489, 490]. Frequency domain instruments using modulation techniques are competing with time-domain instruments using TCSPC. 

Another kind of analyzer has been developed which offers the best features of parallel- and swept-filter spectrum analyzers. So-called dynamic signal analyzers use analog-to-digital conversion followed by frequency-to-time-domain transformation, usually using hard-wired computational machines, to mimic the function of a parallel-filter analyzer with hundreds of filters, and yet are cost-competitive with swept-filter analyzers. In addition, dynamic spectrum analyzers are capable of measuring amplitude and phase accurately these are basically time domain instruments, and their function will be discussed in Section 3.1.4. 

A microwave pulse from a tunable oscillator is injected into the cavity by an anteima, and creates a coherent superposition of rotational states. In the absence of collisions, this superposition emits a free-mduction decay signal, which is detected with an anteima-coupled microwave mixer similar to those used in molecular astrophysics. The data are collected in the time domain and Fourier transfomied to yield the spectrum whose bandwidth is detemimed by the quality factor of the cavity. Hence, such instruments are called Fourier transfomi microwave (FTMW) spectrometers (or Flygare-Balle spectrometers, after the inventors). FTMW instruments are extraordinarily sensitive, and can be used to examine a wide range of stable molecules as well as highly transient or reactive species such as hydrogen-bonded or refractory clusters [29, 30]. 

At the end of the 2D experiment, we will have acquired a set of N FIDs composed of quadrature data points, with N /2 points from channel A and points from channel B, acquired with sequential (alternate) sampling. How the data are processed is critical for a successful outcome. The data processing involves (a) dc (direct current) correction (performed automatically by the instrument software), (b) apodization (window multiplication) of the <2 time-domain data, (c) Fourier transformation and phase correction, (d) window multiplication of the t domain data and phase correction (unless it is a magnitude or a power-mode spectrum, in which case phase correction is not required), (e) complex Fourier transformation in Fu (f) coaddition of real and imaginary data (if phase-sensitive representation is required) to give a magnitude (M) or a power-mode (P) spectrum. Additional steps may be tilting, symmetrization, and calculation of projections. A schematic representation of the steps involved is presented in Fig. 3.5. 

FRET to fluorescent acceptor is obviously more popular because of its two-channel self-calibrating nature. Sensing may result in switching between two fluorescent states, so that in one of them a predominant emission of the donor can be observed and in the other - of the acceptor. This type of FRET can be extended to time domain with the benefit of using simple instrumentation with the longlifetime donors [27]. 

The fourth chapter by James McGuinty et al. describes the more advanced forms of time-domain FLIM. While not immediately available on commercial instruments this chapter should give the reader an idea what the current state-of-the-art is in terms of FLIM instrumentation, and perhaps what to expect on future commercial instruments. Real-time FLIM, combined FLIM-spectral imaging, hyperspectral FLIM-imaging, combined lifetime-anisotropy imaging and some of their applications are covered here. 

Time domain FLIM Theory, instrumentation, and data analysis... 

The photon-economy depends on extrinsic sources of noise, the characteristics and settings of the instrument and also on the analysis method. Usually, the photon-economy depends on the lifetime therefore it is instructive to construct graphs of F as a function of the lifetime. The photon-economy of time-domain techniques has been extensively characterized [10, 14, 32, 33],... 

There is significant debate about the relative merits of frequency and time domain. In principle, they are related via the Fourier transformation and have been experimentally verified to be equivalent [9], For some applications, frequency domain instrumentation is easier to implement since ultrashort light pulses are not required, nor is deconvolution of the instrument response function, however, signal to noise ratio has recently been shown to be theoretically higher for time domain. The key advantage of time domain is that multiple decay components can, at least in principle, be extracted with ease from the decay profile by fitting with a multiexponential function, using relatively simple mathematical methods. 

Ion detection is carried out using image current detection with subsequent Fourier transform of the time-domain signal in the same way as for the Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR) analyzer (see Section 2.2.6). Because frequency can be measured very precisely, high m/z separation can be attained. Here, the axial frequency is measured, since it is independent to the first order on energy and spatial spread of the ions. Since the orbitrap, contrary to the other mass analyzers described, is a recent invention, not many variations of the instrument exist. Apart from Thermo Fischer Scientific s commercial instrument, there is the earlier setup described in References 245 to 247. 

Additionally, with the inclusion of computers as part of an instrument, mathematical manipulation of data was possible. Not only could retention times be recorded automatically in chromatograms but areas under curves could also be calculated and data deconvoluted. In addition, computers made the development of Fourier transform instrumentation, of all kinds, practical. This type of instrument acquires data in one pass of the sample beam. The data are in what is termed the time domain, and application of the Fourier transform mathematical operation converts this data into the frequency domain, producing a frequency spectrum. The value of this methodology is that because it is rapid, multiple scans can be added together to reduce noise and interference, and the data are in a form that can easily be added to reports. 

Field methods of measuring soil water are primarily designed to measure water in the range of -10 to -1500 kPa of pressure. However, different instruments have different ranges as shown in Table 5.1. Tensiometers, porous blocks, and thermocouple psychrometers are usually installed in the field and measurements are taken on a regular basis. Neutron probe and time domain reflectometry (TDR) equipment are usually carried to the field each time a... 

Pulse fluorometry uses a short exciting pulse of light and gives the d-pulse response of the sample, convoluted by the instrument response. Phase-modulation fluorometry uses modulated light at variable frequency and gives the harmonic response of the sample, which is the Fourier transform of the d-pulse response. The first technique works in the time domain, and the second in the frequency domain. Pulse fluorometry and phase-modulation fluorometry are theoretically equivalent, but the principles of the instruments are different. Each technique will now be presented and then compared. 

We need to be aware of the instrumentation that is required to make such measurements. It is extremely expensive just as the sophisticated nmr spectrometers are. However, studies need to be made on the important fundamental processes which occur within that time domain. Therefore, it is essential that many investigators learn to employ the new technology. 

Prior to describing the possible applications of laser-diode fluorometry, it is important to understand the two methods now used to measure fluorescence lifetimes these being the time-domain (Tl)/4 5 24 and frequency-domain (FD) or phase-modulation methods.(25) In TD fluorometry, the sample is excited by a pulse of light followed by measurement of the time-dependent intensity. In FD fluorometry, the sample is excited with amplitude-modulated light. The lifetime can be found from the phase angle delay and demodulation of the emission relative to the modulated incident light. We do not wish to fuel the debate of TD versus FD methods, but it is clear that phase and modulation measurements can be performed with simple and low cost instrumentation, and can provide excellent accuracy with short data acquisition times. 

This comparison between time and frequency domain measurements is performed at submegahertz frequencies in order to avoid the issue of deconvolution of time domain signals. At megahertz frequencies time domain measurements encounter an additional limitation, these signals must be deconvoluted to isolate the sensor response from the instrument response. The need for deconvolutions adds extra software and computation time, which limits the versatility of time domain techniques for real-time applications. No deconvolutions are necessary in the frequency domain as shown below. 

Other near-IR applications which use similar pulse and phase instrumentation as used in lifetime measurements include optical time-domain reflectometry(25) and photon migration in tissue. 26 ... 

There are a variety of feedback controller tuning methods. Probably 80 percent of all loops are tuned experimentally by an instrument mechanic, and 75 percent of the time the mechanic can guess approximately what the settings will be by drawing on experience with similar loops. We will discuss a few of the time-domain methods below. In subsequent chapters we will present other techniques for tinding controller constants in the Laplace and frequency domains. 

---