Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Thermodynamic parameters, change

The thermodynamic parameters change almost linearly with the total number of carbon atoms in hydrocarbon chains. The enthalpy increments for transitions are comparable with those for homologous series of n-alkanes, sodium alkyl sulfates, and long-chain alkyltrimethylammonium bromides [22,29-32,66,67], while the entropy change of melting falls within the range of those for stable bilayers of all double-chain amphiphiles, including natural lipids [19],... [Pg.461]

This assumption is supported inter alia by the kinetics of the formation of the butyl ether (16b) from the amino-aldehyde (17). The kinetic and thermodynamic parameters show conclusively that during the reaction the amino-aldehyde first changes into the isomeric carbinolamine (16a) and that the latter reacts with n-butanol to form the ether. [Pg.187]

As already mentioned, the enthalpy change A//° involved in an elementary propagation step corresponds to the equilibrium constant S. The parameter a, however, is purely entropically influenced mainly due to the steric restrictions during the formation of a helical nucleus. The determination of a, since it is related to the same power (3n - 2) of s, requires the consideration of the dependence of the thermodynamic parameters on the chain length (Eq. (9 a)). [Pg.193]

When this procedure is applied to the data shown for polystyrene in Fig. 116 and to those for polyisobutylene shown previously in Fig. 38 of Chapter VII, the values obtained for t/ i(1 — /T) decrease as the molecular weight increases. The data for the latter system, for example, yield values for this quantity changing from 0.087 at AT-38,000 to 0.064 at ilf = 720,000. This is contrary to the initial definition of the thermodynamic parameters, according to which they should characterize the inherent segment-solvent interaction independent of the molecular structure as a whole. [Pg.537]

A certain ambiguity arises in the proper choice of the thermodynamic parameter p, since entropy changes due to solvent orientation are neglected. The available experimental data (cf. Sect. 4) indicate, however, that the free energy of reaction for systems showing a spin change is close to zero. The numerical analysis has been therefore performed for the specific case p = 0, for which value the rate constant in Fig. 15 has been computed as a function of S and h lkgT. [Pg.96]

The Langmuir equation has a strong theoretical basis, whereas the Freundlich equation is an almost purely empirical formulation because the coefficient N has embedded in it a number of thermodynamic parameters that cannot easily be measured independently.120 These two nonlinear isotherm equations have most of the same problems discussed earlier in relation to the distribution-coefficient equation. All parameters except adsorbent concentration C must be held constant when measuring Freundlich isotherms, and significant changes in environmental parameters, which would be expected at different times and locations in the deep-well environment, are very likely to result in large changes in the empirical constants. [Pg.830]

Regardless of the relative importance of polar and nonpolar interactions in stabilizing the cyclohexaamylose-DFP inclusion complex, the results derived for this system cannot, with any confidence, be extrapolated to the chiral analogs. DFP is peculiar in the sense that the dissociation constant of the cyclohexaamylose-DFP complex exceeds the dissociation constants of related cyclohexaamylose-substrate inclusion complexes by an order of magnitude. This is probably a direct result of the unfavorable entropy change associated with the formation of the DFP complex. Thus, worthwhile speculation about the attractive forces that lead to enantiomeric specificity must await the measurement of thermodynamic parameters for the chiral substrates. [Pg.239]

For several reversible reactions, the thermodynamic parameters for reaction in the quasi-free state are given in Table 10.6 using Eq. (10.16) and the reaction scheme (I). Experimental data for AX°(X = G, H, or S) are taken from Holroyd et al., (1975, 1979) and Holroyd (1977), while Table 10.5A provides data on AX r°, except for TMS (vide supra). The chief uncertainty in these calculations is the experimental determination of V0. It is remarkable that all thermodynamic parameters of reaction in the quasi-free state are negative in the same way as for the overall reaction. In particular, the entropy change is relatively large and probably for the same reason as for the overall reaction (Holroyd, 1977). [Pg.356]

The temperature stability of the complexes seems to be dependent on the molecular weight of the PEG chain, i.e., the larger the PEG the lower the temperature at which the complex dissociates. An important observation was that the complexation/decomplexation phenomenon was reversible by changing the temperature of the system. The positive values of the thermodynamic parameters as well as the experimental observations clearly indicate the important role of hydrophobic interactions in the stabilization of the PMAA/PEG complexes. Since PAA is considerably more hydrophilic than PMAA, hydrophobic interactions do not play an important role in stabilizing the PAA/PEG complexes. This is represented by the much... [Pg.93]

It has been suggested that an increase in the coordination number of vanadium from 4 to 5 already takes place in the second protonation step, i.e. when [H2V04] is formed (21). For reactions (1) and (2), however, the protonation constants and thermodynamic parameters are comparable with those reported for P04 and As04 , providing firm evidence that reaction (2) is not accompanied by incorporation of water in the vanadate ion (15, 17). Further, the estimated thermodynamic quantities for reaction (6), AH° = -39 kJ/mol and AS0 = —51 J/(mol K), obtained by extrapolation from the experimental values for reactions (1) and (2) and those for the three protonation steps of P04 and As04 , are not typical of a simple protonation reaction (17). For such a reaction the entropy change is normally a positive quantity often amounting to 100 50 J/(mol K) and the enthalpy... [Pg.130]

An increase in the coordination number of molybdenum takes place in the second protonation step, which has a dramatic effect on the value of K2. Instead of the typical decrease of 3 to 5 log units from the first to the second protonation constant, K2 has in this case about the same value as Kx. In fact, these unusual values for the protonation constants compared to those of other oxyanions, along with the thermodynamic parameters AH° and AS0, were the basis on which the change in coordination number in the second protonation step was first proposed (54). Previously the small difference between the first and second pK value was interpreted in terms of an anomalously high first protonation constant, assumed to be caused by an increase in the coordination number in the first step (2, 3, 54-57). [Pg.143]


See other pages where Thermodynamic parameters, change is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.1268]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.364]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.94 ]




SEARCH



Thermodynamic change

Thermodynamic parameters

Thermodynamical parameters

Thermodynamics change

Thermodynamics, parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info