Theory molecular modeling

This section provides a comprehensive overview of recent efforts in physical theory, molecular modeling, and performance modeling of CLs in PEFCs. Our major focus will be on state-of-the-art CLs that contain Pt nanoparticle electrocatalysts, a porous carbonaceous substrate, and an embedded network of interconnected ionomer domains as the main constituents. The section starts with a general discussion of structure and processes in catalyst layers and how they transpire in the evaluation of performance. Thereafter, aspects related to self-organization phenomena in catalyst layer inks during fabrication will be discussed. These phenomena determine the effective properties for transport and electrocatalytic activity. Finally, physical models of catalyst layer operation will be reviewed that relate structure, processes, and operating conditions to performance. 

The following several sections deal with various theories or models for adsorption. It turns out that not only is the adsorption isotherm the most convenient form in which to obtain and plot experimental data, but it is also the form in which theoretical treatments are most easily developed. One of the first demands of a theory for adsorption then, is that it give an experimentally correct adsorption isotherm. Later, it is shown that this test is insufficient and that a more sensitive test of the various models requires a consideration of how the energy and entropy of adsorption vary with the amount adsorbed. Nowadays, a further expectation is that the model not violate the molecular picture revealed by surface diffraction, microscopy, and spectroscopy data, see Chapter VIII and Section XVIII-2 Steele [8] discusses this picture with particular reference to physical adsorption. 

Ultimately we may want to make direct comparisons with experimental measurements made on specific materials, in which case a good model of molecular interactions is essential. The aim of so-called ab initio molecular dynamics is to reduce the amount of fitting and guesswork in this process to a minimum. On the other hand, we may be interested in phenomena of a rather generic nature, or we may simply want to discriminate between good and bad theories. When it comes to aims of this kind, it is not necessary to have a perfectly realistic molecular model one that contains the essential physics may be quite suitable. 

Mciny of the theories used in molecular modelling involve multiple integrals. Examples include tire two-electron integrals formd in Hartree-Fock theory, and the integral over the piriitii >ns and momenta used to define the partition function, Q. In fact, most of the multiple integrals that have to be evaluated are double integrals. 

These are all empirical measurements, so the model of the harmonic oscillator, which is pur ely theoretical, becomes semiempirical when experimental information is put into it to see how it compares with molecular vibration as determined spectroscopically. In what follows, we shall refer to empirical molecular models such as MM, which draw heavily on empirical information, ab initio molecular models such as advanced MO calculations, which one strives to derive purely from theory without any infusion of empirical data, and semiempirical models such as PM3, which are in between (see later chapters). 

The purpose of these comparisons is simply to point out how complete the parallel is between the Rouse molecular model and the mechanical models we discussed earlier. While the summations in the stress relaxation and creep expressions were included to give better agreement with experiment, the summations in the Rouse theory arise naturally from a consideration of different modes of vibration. It should be noted that all of these modes are overtones of the same fundamental and do not arise from considering different relaxation processes. As we have noted before, different types of encumbrance have different effects on the displacement of the molecules. The mechanical models correct for this in a way the simple Rouse model does not. Allowing for more than one value of f, along the lines of Example 3.7, is one of the ways the Rouse theory has been modified to generate two sets of Tp values. The results of this development are comparable to summing multiple effects in the mechanical models. In all cases the more elaborate expressions describe experimental results better. 

Resonance theory tells us that molecules which cannot be adequately represented in terms of a single Lewis structure are likely to be unusually stable. What the simple theory does not tell us is the magnitude of the effect, the so-called resonance energy. This can be assessed via molecular modeling. 

It is traditional to divide quantum-mechanical molecular models into three broad bands depending on their degree of sophistication. There are sublevels within each band, and a great deal of jargon accompanied by acronyms. Many authors speak of the level of theory . The Hiickel independent electron model of Chapter 7 typifies the lowest level of theory, and authors sometimes refer to these models as empirical . The Hamiltonian is not rigorously defined, and neither are the basis functions. Nevertheless, these models have been able to produce impressive predictions and rationalizations. 

The aim of the series is to present the latest fundamental material for research chemists, lecturers and students across the breadth of the subject, reaching into the various applications of theoretical techniques and modelling. The series concentrates on teaching the fundamentals of chemical structure, symmetry, bonding, reactivity, reaction mechanism, solid-state chemistry and applications in molecular modelling. It will emphasize the transfer of theoretical ideas and results to practical situations so as to demonstrate the role of theory in the solution of chemical problems in the laboratory and in industry. 

How does electron sharing lead to bonding between atoms Two models have been developed to describe covalent bonding valence bond theory and molecular orbital theory. Each model has its strengths and weaknesses, and chemists tend... 

Section 5.6 considers the kinetic theory of gases, the molecular model on which the ideal gas law is based. Finally, in Section 5.7 we describe the extent to which real gases deviate from the law. ... 

In recent years the old quantum theory, associated principally with the names of Bohr and Sommerfeld, encountered a large number of difficulties, all of which vanished before the new quantum mechanics of Heisenberg. Because of its abstruse and difficultly interpretable mathematical foundation, Heisenberg s quantum mechanics cannot be easily applied to the relatively complicated problems of the structures and properties of many-electron atoms and of molecules in particular is this true for chemical problems, which usually do not permit simple dynamical formulation in terms of nuclei and electrons, but instead require to be treated with the aid of atomic and molecular models. Accordingly, it is especially gratifying that Schrodinger s interpretation of his wave mechanics3 provides a simple and satisfactory atomic model, more closely related to the chemist s atom than to that of the old quantum theory. 

This result must now, however, be replaced by one based upon the quantum theory. In this case a generally applicable expression cannot be obtained, and it is necessary to consider particular molecular models. W. Pauli, Jr.3 has treated the diatomic dipole, which is of interest to us, and his treatment forms the basis of this discussion. 

Molecularly motivated empiricisms, such as the solubility parameter concept, have been valuable in dealing with mixtures of weakly interacting small molecules where surface forces are small. However, they are completely inadequate for mixtures that involve macromolecules, associating entities like surfactants, and rod-like or plate-like species that can form ordered phases. New theories and models are needed to describe and understand these systems. This is an active research area where advances could lead to better understanding of the dynamics of polymers and colloids in solution, the rheological and mechanical properties of these solutions, and, more generally, the fluid mechaiucs of non-Newtonian liquids. 

Further progress in understanding membrane instability and nonlocality requires development of microscopic theory and modeling. Analysis of membrane thickness fluctuations derived from molecular dynamics simulations can serve such a purpose. A possible difficulty with such analysis must be mentioned. In a natural environment isolated membranes assume a stressless state. However, MD modeling requires imposition of special boundary conditions corresponding to a stressed state of the membrane (see Refs. 84,87,112). This stress can interfere with the fluctuations of membrane shape and thickness, an effect that must be accounted for in analyzing data extracted from computer experiments. 

This extension in the laboratory can be seen as the fantastic hypothesis testing application of molecular modeling. It is rare to find a chemical problem where there are not at least a few theories of the molecular mechanism involved. How many times has each of us heard steric affect or hydrogen bonding invoked as the explanation of a variety of experimental observations made at the bench level How useful would it be to be able to actually build accurate, quantitative models to investigate such ideas ... 

The natural questions that arise are what constitutes the stems, how the stems (if they exist) get attached at the growth front, what the free-energy barriers are, etc. The molecular modeling has provided vivid details for these questions, and has shown that the assumptions of the LH model are not valid in any universal way. The simulation results have clearly underscored the need for new theories of polymer crystallization by providing credence to the criticisms of the LH theory. 

---