The physical properties of interest

The great commercial impact that polymer materials have made is a consequence of their unique physical properties. Polymers are able to exhibit a combination of strength and flexibihty which cannot be obtained with metals or ceramics. We encounter plastics either as hard crystalline or glassy soHds, or as elastomers with rubbery mechanical characteristics. 

Probably the most obvious physical property of a polymer is its hardness or softness. Indeed, the words plastic and rubber convey a picture of a deformable material. There are five important mechanical properties which form 

Starting with hardness, we define a scientific measure of this as the modulus. In essence, this is the force required to bring about unit deformation.The force is called stress and the deformation is called strain. Then modulus is the stress to bring about unit strain. There are difierent moduli depending on the geometric characteristics of the applied stress. The two most important of these are  

The softness is quantified by the term compliance. This is the strain brought about by unit stress. It is, therefore, the mathematical inverse of the modulus. 

Interestingly, when we come to the acoustic properties of polymer materials, we are concerned with almost the same properties as in mechanical studies. This is 

---

When a reservoir fluid study is unavailable, the engineer must rely on correlations to estimate values of the physical properties of interest. I have compared most of the published fluid property correlations with the results of hundreds of reservoir fluid studies. The best available correlations are given in this chapter. 

The scattering function Kc/Rg is the quantity directly related to the physical properties of interest. It consists of an optical constant K times the concentration, divided by the Rayleigh ratio. The constant K is defined by... 

How long should we run This depends on the system and the physical properties of interest. Suppose that we are interested in a variable X, defined such that its ensemble average X= %) = 0. (Here and throughout we use script letters for instantaneous dynamical variables, i.e., functions of coordinates and momenta, to distinguish them from averages and thermodynamic quantities.) A characteristic time, x, may be defined, over which the correlations (x(O)x(t)) decay towards zero. The simulation run time should be significantly longer than i. 

The most widely used methods to predict aqueous solubility from molecular structure are quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) [4-6], which are empirical models that use experimental data to learn a statistical relationship between the physical property of interest (i.e., solubility) and molecular descriptors calculable from a simple computational representation of the molecule (e.g., counts of atoms or functional groups, polar surface area, and molecular dipole moment) [1], The current... 

The simplicity of (2.25) is to be contrasted with the complexity of the exact P(R n) for realistic models of flexible chains for all R (and for small n). When dealing with the complicated problems of nonideal polymer solutions, etc., it is therefore customary to replace the real polymer chain by the so-called Kuhn effective random flight chain. An effective chain is one with N (in general different from n) links of size A5 such that N lS.s = L and (R ) is as given by (2.29). This substitution of a real chain by its equivalent chain is often a necessity so that we may separate errors in principle from errors arising from a poor mathematical approximation to the exact P(R n) when dealing with problems which are not exactly soluble. This equivalent chain therefore provides us with reasonable approximations to the properties of real polymer chains, provided the physical properties of interest do not depend heavily upon those chain configurations with i > L or upon chain properties over small distances for which the real chain is stiff. 

The organization of this section follows a two-step approach. The first step corresponds to searching for the substance of interest, that is, the relevant group of substances. The second step corresponds to the physical property of interest. 

In most cases, we do not simplify this equation further as the physical property of interest for the monomer (Ya) and the dimer (7x) are usually both unknown. We therefore substitute for a using (115) in (116) to obtain (117). 

Another shortcoming of such models is that they do not take into consideration the pore size distributions. They are only useful if the average pore size is of importance in relation to the physical property of interest for example, they may be of use if it is just the absolute permeability that is of interest. However, for investigating more complex phenomena, for example associated with two-phase flow or dispersion, the pore size distribution needs to be taken into account. 

If necessary the process may be iterated, by using the fitted potential to generate a new ionic configuration to input to the ab initio calculation. The resulting potentials may be used in much larger scale MD simulations to obtain the physical properties of interest [3, 9], In the case of simple systems, the force-matching may even be avoided by computing the various interaction terms separately [5],... 

Since, ultimately, the properties of a polymer blend will depend on the final morphology, various research groups have recently undertaken extensive studies of the miscibility and phase behavior of polymer blends. In practice, the physical properties of interest are found either by miscible pairs or by a heterogeneous system, depending on the type of application. Generally, polymer blends can be completely miscible, partially miscible or immiscible, depending on the value of AG [4]. 

The efficient utilization of any polymeric material requires a detailed molecular understanding of its unique properties. In its most useful form, such information consists of quantitative relationships between the physical properties of interest and the structural characteristics of the material that determines them. In the case of elastomeric materials, the molecular feature of surpassing importance is the interlinking or cross-linking of the polymer chains into a macroscopic, three-dimensional network structure ". Such networks can not be molecularly dispersed in a solvent, and the usual solution characterization techniques can not be applied to obtain the required structural information. For this reason, it has been exceedingly difficult to obtain reliable structure-property relationships for elastomeric materials ... 

---