The LET Effect

The quantitative aspects of track reactions are involved some details will be presented in Chapter 7. The LET effect is known for H2 and H202 yields in aqueous radiation chemistry. The yields of secondary reactions that depend on either the molecular or the radical yield are affected similarly. Thus, the yield of Fe3+ ion in the Fricke dosimeter system and the initiation yield of radiation-induced polymerization decrease with LET. Numerous examples of LET effects are known in radiation chemistry (Allen, 1961 Falconer and Burton, 1963 Burns and Barker, 1965) and in radiation biology (Lamerton, 1963). 

Very recently Kouchi et al. constructed an ion beam pulse radiolysis system and use it for the study of the LET effect in irradiated polystyrene thin films [106]. The nanosecond pulsed MeV ion beam with the variable repetition rate was obtained by chopping ion beams from a Van de Graaff. Time profiles of the excimer fluorescence from polystyrene thin films, excited by He+ impact, were... 

For the investigation of the LET effect on the time profile, it is important to measure the time profiles in the following three energy regions for the same kind of ions (see the stopping power curves in Fig. 8). 

A high probability for finding two radicals close together would also be expected in regions of high ionization density. Evidence for this effect being operative has been found from studies of the LET effect on radical pair formation in eicosane. ... 

This explanation did not agree with the experimental results by Pradhan and Rassow (1987) according to which the low-temperature TL peak of CaF2 Tm at 110"C was less affected by the high LET neutron radiation compared with that of the 250"C peak. In addition, the sum of the TL response of the 150 and 250"C peaks showed that the y-ray-produced trapped carriers were not affected by the neutron radiation. These results led to the assumption that the traps and the recombination centers together form complex defects. The different LET dependencies of the various TL peaks were then proposed to be due to different dimensions of the related defect complexes. The high LET radiation was assumed to produce a faster saturation of the smaller defect complexes, and hence the differences in the LET effects on the various TL peaks. It seems that to confirm the above assumption a method has to be developed to measure the dimensions of the defect complexes. 

To be specific let us have in mind a picture of a porous catalyst pellet as an assembly of powder particles compacted into a rigid structure which is seamed by a system of pores, comprising the spaces between adjacent particles. Such a pore network would be expected to be thoroughly cross-linked on the scale of the powder particles. It is useful to have some quantitative idea of the sizes of various features of the catalyst structur< so let us take the powder particles to be of the order of 50p, in diameter. Then it is unlikely that the macropore effective diameters are much less than 10,000 X, while the mean free path at atmospheric pressure and ambient temperature, even for small molecules such as nitrogen, does not exceed... 

Next let us consider the differences in molecular architecture between polymers which exclusively display viscous flow and those which display a purely elastic response. To attribute the entire effect to molecular structure we assume the polymers are compared at the same temperature. Crosslinking between different chains is the structural feature responsible for elastic response in polymer samples. If the crosslinking is totally effective, we can regard the entire sample as one giant molecule, since the entire volume is permeated by a continuous network of chains. This result was anticipated in the discussion of the Bueche theory for chain entanglements in the last chapter, when we observed that viscosity would be infinite with entanglements if there were no slippage between chains. 

Equation (9-113) shows that Eq. (9-114) is only approximately true and should be used, if at all, solely for low interest rates. Let us consider the case of a nominal (DCFRR) of 5 percent and an inflation rate of 3 percent. Equation (9-14) yields an approximate effective return rate of 2 percent, compared with the real effective rate of 1.94 percent given by Eq. (9-113) i.e., there is an error of 3.1 percent. Now let us consider the case of a nominal (DCFRR) of 2.5 percent and an inflation rate of 23 percent. Equation (9-114) yields an approximate effective return rate of 2 percent, compared with 1.63 percent from Eq. (9-113) in this case, the error that results is 22.7 percent. 

For argument sake, let s say that 4,500 of the 6,000 total cost is for lower energy and water costs over say a wet scrubber, and that 7,000 of the 10,000 in benefits is due to utility savings one could then use them to offset each other. Mathematically, then, both the numerator and denominator of the ratio could be reduced by 4,500 with the following effect ... 

The heat effect per unit length by radiation and convection from a water-heated panel can be calculated theoretically. For example, consider panels of width 0.6 m, 0.9 m, and 1.2 m. Room temperature is 3 °C and surface temperature 30 °C, 50 °C, and 70 C of the panel. Let us compare the results with calculations for room temperature 15 °C and surface temperature 40 C, 60 "C, and 80 °C of the panel. 

A lower bound on the overall effect of crossover, which can both create and destroy instances of a given schema, can be estimated by calculating the probability, Pc S), that crossover leaves a schema S unaltered. Let be the probability that the crossover operation will be applied to a string. Since a schema S will be destroyed by crossover if the operation is applied anywhere within its defining length, the probability that S will be destroyed is equal to Pc x 6 S)/ K — 1), where 6 S) is the defining length of S. Hence, the probability of survival ps = 1 — PcS S)/ K — 1), and equation 11.9 takes the updated form ... 

Chemical reactions form the heart of chemistry. And there is no more important aspect of chemical reactions than the energy effects that are caused. You will realize this if you let your thoughts wander between the warmth the little child in the fable derived from the combustion... 

Let us return to the debit and credit balance we found in our water gas fuel problem. In terms of A//, the heat effects are as follows ... 

In order to avoid any source of inaccuracy that might arise from the fact that the absolute intensity line cannot be reproduced, on account of the nature of the instruments themselves, the intensity is always measured with respect to that of a standard sample. Let us suppose that I0/Is represents the ratio of the line height of the compound which is to be irradiated to that of the standard sample. After irradiation, the new ratio has become ///g. On eliminating Is then we get I/I0 which represents the intensity change on going from the irradiated to the nonirradiated compound. Suppose now that the concentration of the new chemical species or, in general terms, imperfections induced by irradiation be proportional to the amount of radiation absorbed in the sample. Then the relation which represents the impurity effect may immediately be written as follows ... 

Thus in this system, in addition to the usual requirements, the separator has the task of delaying penetration for as long as possible. A membrane would be regarded as perfect which lets hydroxyl ions pass, but not the larger zincate ions. This requirements is best met by regenerated cellulose ( cellophane ) [10,11], which in swollen condition shows such ion-selective properties but at the same time is also chemically very sensitive and allows only a limited number of cycles the protective effects of additional fleeces of polyamide or polypropylene have already been taken into account. 

We shall demonstrate that the magnitude of the salt effect is an attribute of the rate law, not of the reaction mechanism. To do so, let us consider two mechanisms by which the second term of the rate law in Eq. (9-49) might proceed. It is easy to envisage that... 

The attractive energies 4D(cr/r)6 and ae2/2 r4 have two important effects on the vibrational energy transfer (a) they speed up the approaching collision partners so that the kinetic energy of the relative motion is increased, and (b) they modify the slope of the repulsive part of the interaction potential on which the transition probability depends. By letting m °°, we have completely ignored the second effect while we have over-emphasized the first. Note that Equation 12 is identical to an expression we could obtain when the interaction potential is assumed as U(r) = A [exp (— r/a)] — (ae2/2aA) — D. Similarly, if we assume a modified Morse potential of the form... 

Let do be the diameter of the telescope for which the cone effect causes a phase error a = 1 rad. Thus for a telescope L> the phase error is =... 

---