The Interface Model

Phase equilibrium is assumed to exist only at the interface with the mole fractions in both phases related by 

---

The term G T, a,, A/, ) is the Gibbs free energy of the full electrochemical system x < x < X2 in Fig. 5.4). It includes the electrode surface, which is influenced by possible reconstructions, adsorption, and charging, and the part of the electrolyte that deviates from the uniform ion distribution of the bulk electrolyte. The importance of these requirements becomes evident if we consider the theoretical modeling. If the interface model is chosen too small, then the excess charges on the electrode are not fuUy considered and/or, within the interface only part of the total potential drop is included, resulting in an electrostatic potential value at X = X2 that differs from the requited bulk electrolyte value < s-However, if we constrain such a model to reproduce the electrostatic potential... 

The approach to the mathematical definition of the interface model is very simple. For every layer in the interface, the charge is defined once as a function of chemical parameters and once as a function of electrostatic parameters. The functions for charge are set equal to each other and solved for the unknown electrochemical potentials. Mathematical techniques for solving the equations have been worked out and described in detail (9). 

While Stern recognized that formally one should include the capacitance between the 1HP and OHP in the interface model, he concluded that the error introduced into the electrical properties predicted for the interface would usually be small if the second capacitance were neglected, and 2 were set equal to. ... 

Equations 9-14 provide the framework for combining either of the two surface hydrolysis models that were presented with any of the four electric double layer models to define the interface model completely and to solve for all unknown potentials, charges, and surface concentrations. In the following section some specific limiting cases are considered. 

In this section, the reactions and general equations for the catalyst layers are presented first. Next, the models are examined starting with the interface models, then the microscopic ones, and finally the simple and embedded macrohomogeneous ones. Finally, at the end of this section, a discussion about the treatment of flooding is presented. 

Overall, the interface models are basically 0-D. They assume that all of the relevant variables in the catalyst layers are uniform in their values across the layer. This has some justification in that the catalyst layers are very thin, and it is adequate if other effects that are modeled are more significant however, the catalyst layers should be modeled in more detail to ensure that all the relevant interactions are accounted for and to permit optimization of such parameters as catalyst loading. 

The more common understanding of DSSCs, that we now refer to as the interface model and formerly referred to as the kinetic model [12], was developed by... 

The interface model predicts that Vcx in a dye cell will not be limited by because does not control the charge-separation process. Rather than having large potential gradients at equilibrium, as in conventional cells, the DSSC has only small and relatively insignificant values of and xbl. Illumination of a DSSC causes the potential gradients to increase, whereas in a conventional cell, they decrease upon illumination. Because the photoinduced increase in is practically eliminated by electrolyte ion redistribution, the photoinduced increase in p,neq can drive an efficient photoconversion process. 

Although the interface models by the MD methods provide a picture of the atomic distribution of the interface, because of the limitation of the MD method, the details of the interface structure in the vicinity of the electrode is not accurate. The effect of polymer side groups and backbone on the interface structure, specifically the... 

Earlier speculations about the effect of the curvature of space on elemental synthesis and the stability of nuclides (2.4.1) are consistent with the interface model. The absolute curvature of the closed double cover of projective space, and the Hubble radius of the universe, together define the golden mean as a universal shape factor [233], characteristic of intergalactic space. This factor regulates the proton neutron ratio of stable nuclides and the detail of elemental periodicity. The self-similarity between material structures at different levels of size, such as elementary particles, atomic nuclei, chemical... 

Similar conclusions apply to interface structures (Chapter 6). Textural examinations of reactant-product contact zones have revealed greater structural complexities than were recognised in earlier work. The interface model leads to the kinetic representation that the rate of product formation is directly proportional to the area of reactant-product contact and its geometric pattern of development (Chapter 3). 

Figure 8.1. Film model for transfer in phase x. Turbulent eddies wipe out composition gradients in the bulk fluid phase. Composition variations are restricted to a layer (film) of thickness f adjacent to the interface. Model due to Lewis and Whitman.

An age-old argument about the heat-death of the universe is also settled by the interface model. It relates to the problem that the second law of thermodynamics is time-irreversible, but based on time-reversible laws of physics. It has been argued (Boeyens, 2005) that, because the world lines in neighbouring tangent spaces of the curved manifold are not parallel, a static distribution of mass points must be inherently unstable. As systems with non-parallel world lines interact a chaotic situation such as the motion in an ideal gas occurs, which means that time flow generates entropy. 

The interface model can be further complicated by considering the possible adsorption of molecules. Obviously, the substrate will modulate the interaction of the surface with adsorbates. For instance, the interaction of the Ag-supported MgO with water was simulated and compared with that on a pure MgO surface. 

Anderson RC (1998) Mid-course correction toward a sustainable enterprise the interface model. Peregrinzilla Press, Atlanta, GA, p 228... 

With the use of this MDFEA framework, nonlinearities are accounted for in the individual computational modules, such as in ZEUS-NL and VecTorl. The different features of these modules, including finite element model resolutions, theoretical algorithms and numerical techniques, will lead to different accuracy levels and different deviations of strain and stress resultants. Hence, the actual movements and reaction feedbacks at control points will contain errors combined from multiple modules that are difficult to eliminate. Another error source originates from the interface modeling, such as in this case study example in which either rigid or flexible slab assumptions were used. 

Dielectric-saturation models attribute the hydration repulsion to the presence of a layer with lower dielectric constant, e, in the vicinity of the interfaces. Models with a stepwise [584,585] and continuous [586] variation of e have been proposed. 

The principal crystallographic defects are (1) vacancies Vo and Vm for MOx/2 (2) interstitials Op- and Mp+. In fact oxide films can be described as exponentially-doped semiconductor junctions. The fundamentals and process optimization of anodized aluminum have been studied thoroughly by Brace, Thompson, Wood, Mansfeld, and recent years by Shih through the comprehensive studies of anodization of different aluminum alloys, different anodization processes, and different manufacturing processes [51 - 60]. The interface model of anodized aluminum with hot DIW seal has been described by Mansfeld, Kendig, Shih and others [61- 72] as shown in Fig.20. 

Assuming that Q, Cpo and Cb are capacitances which represent the capacitances of Y2O3 coating layer, porous layer of anodized aluminum and barrier layer of anodized aluminum, respectively. The interface parameters can be obtained and the coating quality can be monitored. The interface model can be described as the following equation [28, 78]. 

Consider a metal electrode consisting of a silver wire placed inside the body, with a solution of silver ions between the wire and ECF, supporting the reaction Ag" + e <— Ag. This is an example of an electrode of the first kind, which is defined as a metal electrode directly immersed into an electrolyte of ions of the metal s salt. As the concentration of silver ions [Ag" ] decreases, the resistance of the interface increases. At very low silver ion concentrations, the Faradaic impedance Zfaradaic becomes very large, and the interface model shown in Fig. 3(a) reduces to a solution resistance in series with the capacitance C. Such an electrode is an ideally polarizable electrode. At very high silver concentrations, the Faradaic impedance approaches zero and the interface model of Fig. 3(a) reduces to a solution resistance in series with the Faradaic impedance Zfaradaic. which is approximated by the solution resistance only. Such an electrode is an ideally nonpolarizable electrode. 

Analytically, the interface models are defined by certain idealized continuity conditions. For example, in the two-dimensional case shown in Figure 1, the interface conditions corresponding to models a-c, respectively are... 

The monotonic and cyclic behavior of interfaces is described by the constitutive model developed by Vassilopoulou and Tassios (2003) where the models of friction and dowel resistance of Tassios and Vintzileou (1987), Vintzileou and Tassios (1986, 1987) are adopted. The interface model accounts for the combined shear force resistance mobilized along interfaces due to sliding both under monotonic and cyclic imposed deformations. This model was further modifled by Paheraki et al. (2012) and adopted by the current Greek Code for Interventions (2013) (see Fig. 6). In case of cyclic loading, additional modifications and extensions were applied (Thermou et al. 2012b). 

Anderson, R. C. Mid-course Correction Towards a Sustainable Enterprise The Interface Model, Chelsea Green Pubhshing Company, White River Junction, VT, 1998. 

Working together toward a more sustainable society includes responsibility, respect of natural resources (no farm and fisheries mining), conservation, preservation, and clever technological development. The three main pillars of sustainability are based on society, economics, and environment. Ray Anderson in his book Midcourse Correction Toward a Sustainable Enterprise The Interface Model defined three levels in the journey toward sustainability [23]. 

---