The different iron oxides

Lepidocrocite is paramagnetic at room temperature. The Neel temperature of 77 K is much lower than that of the other iron oxides and is the result of the layer-like structure of this mineral. The sheets of Fe(0,0H)6 octahedra are linked by weak hydrogen bonds, hence magnetic interactions are relatively weak. The saturation hyperfine field is also lower than for any other iron oxide (Tab. 6.2). In the antiferromagnetic state, the spins are ordered parallel to the c-axis with spins in alternate layers having opposite signs. A decrease of T by 5 K was observed for Al-lepidocrocites with an Al/(Fe-i-Al) ratio of 0.1 (De Grave et al., 1995). 

At room temperature, akaganeite is, like lepidocrocite, paramagnetic. It becomes antiferromagnetic below the Neel temperature of 290 K (Murad, 1988). The value of Tn and the strength of the magnetic interactions are variable and depend upon synthesis conditions (i.e. the temperature and the length of the hydrolysis period). These influence the amount of interstitial water in the compound, which in turn induces spin reduction. Tn decreases linearly to 250 K as the H20/unit cell rises to 0.02 mol mor (Chambaere De Grave, 1984 a). 

In the antiferromagnetic state, the spins are oriented parallel to the c-axis. Moss-bauer studies have indicated that the number and type of subsites in the magnetic structure may be influenced by the halide concentration, the nature of the halide and the level of excess protons vhich balance the halide charge. When chloride is present in the structure, there are tv o different Fe sites, vhereas for fluoride-containing akaganeite, the number of non-equivalent cation sites may be greater. 

---

If over the region of interest, the scattering coefficient hardly varies with wavelength, the shapes of the remission spectrum and the absorption spectrum should be very similar. The relationship between the remission function and the reflectance spectrum is shown in Figure 7.2 left, and the Kubelka-Munk functions of the different iron oxides are illustrated in Figure 7.2, right. 

Tab. 10.2 Experimentally determined density of OH groups on the different iron oxides.

Leland and Bard (1987) found that the different iron oxides induced photooxidation of oxalate and sulphite at rates that varied by up to two orders of magnitude. For oxalate, the rate was greater for maghemite than for hematite, but this order was reversed for sulphite. Lepidocrocite (layer structure) induced faster oxidation of both compounds that did the other polymorphs of FeOOH (tunnel structures) the authors considered that the rate differences were probably associated with structural differences between the adsorbents. 

Tab. 16.2 A generalized sutntnary of the occurrence of the different iron oxides in various soils (see Sch A/ertmann, 1985)...

This book is aimed at collecting all aspects of the information about iron oxides into one compact volume. It provides a coherent text with a maximum of homogeneity and minimum overlap between chapters. It is structured according to topics, i. e. surface chemistry, dissolution behaviour, adsorption etc. For each topic a general introduction is followed by a section which reviews current knowledge concerning the different iron oxides. The latter section includes much detailed information and recent data from the authors own laboratories. As this is intended to be a handbook, an extensive list of references to help the reader expand various details is provided. We have also indicated some of the numerous opportunities for further research in this field. 

Table 19.2 Structural and magnetic properties of the different iron oxide phases. 

When promoters are the same, the surface active site densities of fused iron catalysts derived from the different iron oxides are not with the obvious differences, but all about (7- 8) x 10 mol-m , while the active site number approx. (0.9 - 1.2) X 10 mol g which is in the direct proportion to its specific surface area. It is seen from Table 3.32 that along with the variation of the precursor iron oxides, especially with the increasing content of FeO, the surface active site numbers are not increasing, but seem to be in decreasing tendency. It can be deduced from this that the reason why the Fei xO based catalysts show a higher activity than Fe304 based one is not the fact that the surface active site number of the former is higher than that of the latter. 

The experimental samples used were fused iron catalyst, which contain promoters such as AI2O3, K2O, CaO, Si02 and used the different iron oxides as precursors. First, samples were reduced for 96 h in pure hydrogen (99.9999%) at atmospheric pressure. The H2 flow rate was 270ml min. Temperature-program steps were as follows 450°C for 72h, 475°C for 12h and 500°C for 12 h with temperature ramp for all stages of 10 ml min C... 

Table 2.2 summarizes basic crystallographic data for the iron oxides. Iron oxides, hydroxides and oxide hydroxides consist of arrays of Fe ions and 0 or OH ions. As the anions are much larger than the cations (the radius of the 0 ion is 0.14 nm, whereas those of Fe and Fe" are 0.065 and 0.082 nm, respectively), the arrangement of anions governs the crystal structure and the ease of topological interconversion between different iron oxides. Table 2.3 lists the atomic coordinates of the iron oxides. 

This section considers aspects and examples of the dissolution behaviour of individual iron oxides. Additional data are listed in Table 12.3 for a range of experimental conditions. As yet, characteristic dissolution rates carmot be assigned to the various iron oxides (Blesa Maroto, 1986). There are, however, some consistent differences between oxides with considerable stability differences, hence a comparison of the oxides is included here. In addition, the reactivity of any particular oxide may vary from sample to sample, depending on its source (natural or synthetic) and the conditions under which it formed. To illustrate this. Table 12.4 summarizes conditions and results from dissolution experiments in which a range of samples of the same oxide was compared. How the properties of the sample influence its dissolution behaviour is still not fully understood. A thorough characterization of the samples by solid state analysis, e. g. by EXAFS, to provide a basis for understanding the dissolution behaviour is, therefore, desirable. 

In addition to a better understanding of the reaction of sulfide with ferric oxides and its role in pyrite formation, a more exact definition of the term reactive iron is critical. Does reactive iron mean a different iron oxide fraction for bacterial dissolution (e.g., weathering products such as goethite or hematite) than for reaction with sulfide (e.g., reoxidized lepidocrocite) In other words, is there a predigestion of ferric oxides by bacteria that allows a subsequent rapid interaction of sulfide with ferric oxides ... 

The ternary iron oxides, as exemplified by the iron-niobium system, offer an opportunity to obtain single-phase, conducting n-type iron oxides in which the conductivity can be controlled by means of chemical substitution. At first glance, FeNbO and FeNb Og might appear to be very different materials. Yet as MM O and MM Og they merely represent superstructures of the basic a-PbO. structure obtained under the conditions of preparation (7 ). Consequently, they form a solid solution in which the two valence states of iron are uniformly distributed throughout a single homogeneous phase (j3). 

The aforementioned frequency of the use of these nanomaterial shapes is best attributed to two factors (1) the ease with which these nanoparticle shapes can be synthesized in the laboratory and (2) the availability of these nanomaterials from commercial sources. It cannot be the aim of this review to cover all of the different nanomaterials used so far, but some of the most commonly investigated will be introduced in more detail. For zero-dimensional nanoparticles, emphasis will be put on metallic nanoparticles (mainly gold), semiconductor quantum dots, as well as magnetic (different iron oxides) and ferroelectric nanoparticles. In the area of onedimensional nanomaterials, metal and semiconductor nanorods and nano wires as well as carbon nanotubes will be briefly discussed, and for two-dimensional nanomaterials only nanoclay. Finally, researchers active in the field are advised to seek further information about these and other nanomaterials in the following, very insightful review articles [16, 36-45]. 

The largest proportion of the total Fe was removed by ammonium oxalate, which attacks the amorphic fraction of iron oxide in the sediments (23). Among the low pH extractants, hydroxylamine was the least efficient in extracting Fe. The difference between the extraction of Fe by acid and extraction by hydroxylamine was related to the crystallinity of the hydrous iron oxide. As pure iron oxides aged (and crystallized) in the laboratory, Fe solubility in hydroxylamine declined relative to solubility in acetic acid (Table III). In San Francisco Bay sediments, the ratio of hydroxylamine-soluble Fe to acetic acid-soluble Fe increased during the period of maximum runoff to the estuary (27) suggesting the proportion of the Fe in the sediments that was freshly precipitated varied seasonally. This was expected, since periods of heavy runoff are also times of maximum Fe movement from the watershed to the tributaries of the estuary ( ). 

For instance, iron oxides are well known for being some of the most globally accepted colors. They are approved for use in drugs in most countries in the world. However, there are significant differences in the specifications for the various iron oxides listed in U.S. European, and Japanese regulations which mean that only certain iron oxides available in the marketplace can meet all of these requirements. In most cases, these grades must be subjected to many tests to provide assurance of compliance, which impacts the costs of these grades. 

Can any of the spectroscopically characterized Fe(III) atoms be identified with iron at the ferroxidase center EPR (56, 60), Mbssbauer (57), and UV-difference (51) spectroscopy suggest that the first iron oxidized is at isolated sites, but that the Fe(III) then migrates to clus-... 

Eight different iron oxides have been identified in the weathering environment to date. They are goethite and hematite (common), lepidocro-cite, maghemite, ferrihydrite and magnetite (moderately widespread) and akaganeite and feroxyhyte (rare). These minerals often occur in close association. Since they have similar or even identical composition, a logical question is - under what conditions do the different oxides form ... 

The difference in oxidation potentials (A ) detected for the two waves found for the poly(ferrocenylsilanes) 15 (R = R = Me, Et, -Bu, -Hex), which provides an indication of the degree of interaction between the iron sites, varies from 0.21 V (for 15 (R = R = Me)) to 0.29 V (for 15 (R = R = -Bu or -Hex)) (63). This indicates that the extent of the interaction between the ferrocenyl units in poly(ferrocenylsilanes) depends significantly on the nature of the substituents at silicon, which may be a result of electronic or conformational effects (63). Unsymmetrically substituted poly(ferrocenylsilanes) show similar electrochemical behavior (59). In addition, polymer 15 (R = Me, R = Fc) shows a complex cyclic voltammogram which indicates that interactions exist between the iron centers in the polymer backbone and the ferrocenyl side groups (59). 

---