The Coupling of Representations

These results clearly illustrate the importance of the GOT. It not only provides a selection rule at the level of the irreps, but also at the level of the components. Of course, the latter selection rule will work only if we ensured that the symmetry adaptation of the basis set has been carried out at the component level, as was explained in Sect. 5.3. 

A further consequence is that SALCs on peripheral atom sites can quite often easily be derived from central symmetry-adapted orbitals. One simply has to make sure that the SALCs have the same nodal characteristics as the central functions, so as to guarantee maximal overlap. This is well illustrated in Fig. 4.4. 

Overlap integrals are scalar products of a bra and a ket function. A general matrix element is an integral of the outer product of a bra, an operator, and a ket, giving rise to a triad of irreps. The evaluation of such elements is based on the coupling of irreps. This concept refers to the formation of a product space. The simplest example is the formation of a two-electron wavefunction, obtained by multiplying two one-electron functions. This section will be devoted entirely to the formation of such product spaces. 

Consider two sets of orbitals, transforming as the irreps Fa and Fi, respectively, each occupied by one electron. A two-electron wavefunction with electron 1 in the Ya component of the first set, and electron 2 in the yj, component of the second set is written as a simple product function FaYai l)) rbYb 2)). Clearly, since the one-electron function spaces are invariants of the group, their product space is invariant, too. Now the question is to determine the symmetry of this new space. The recipe to find this symmetry can safely be based on the character theorem first determine the character string for the product basis, and then carry out the reduction according to the character theorem. Symmetry operators are all-electron operators affecting all particles together hence, the effect of a symmetry operation on a ket product is to transform both kets simultaneously. 

The transformation of the product functions is thus expressed by a super matrix, each element of which is a product of two matrix elements for the individual orbital transformations. The trace of this super matrix is given by  

---

Some induction schemes for ct, n, and 5 orbital basis sets on C y sites of polyhedral complexes are to be found in Appendix D. In addition to the Frobenius theorem, there is also a stronger result for induction theory based on the concept of a fiber bundle. This requires the coupling of representations and will be considered in Sect. 6.9. 

The remaining combinations vanish for symmetry reasons [the operator transforms according to B (A") hreducible representation]. The nonvanishing of the off-diagonal matrix element fl+ is responsible for the coupling of the adiabatic electronic states. 

Fig. 6.2 Schematic representation of the coupling of two adenylhexanucleotides on a T-matrix to give the dodecaoligonucleotide...

Over recent years, increased computational power and improved efficiency have allowed significant developments and improvements to be applied to climate models [19], including the improved representation of dynamical processes such as advection [20] and an increase in the horizontal and vertical resolution of models. It has also enabled additional processes to be incorporated in models, particularly the coupling of the atmospheric and ocean components of models, the modelling of aerosols and of land surface and sea ice processes. The parame-terisations of physical processes have also been improved. 

M is the projection of J on the space-fixed z-axis, 0 its projection on the body-fixed z-axis, which is chosen here along the r vector. The D Ijq are Wigner matrices and are angular functions in the coupled BF representation. 

Fig. 13. Schematic representation of the coupling of a CF MAS NMR probe with an on-line gas chromatograph. Reproduced with permission from (60). Copyright 1999 Kluwer Academic.

Tang et al. [20] have examined the population dynamics in a three-level system, and its representation in a surrogate two-level system, to test the scheme outlined above. In the model system considered state 3 is weakly coupled with states 1 and 2, so that population transfer between states 1 and 2 should dominate the dynamics, with only a small contribution from population transfer to and from state 3. The coupling of state 3 with states 1 and 2 was taken to be one-tenth of the coupling between states 1 and 2, that is, M)3 = M23 = Mn/10 = -1/10. Using the formalism sketched above, the exact system dynamics is governed by the coupled equations of motion for the three states,... 

The spin-orbit coupling term in the Hamiltonian induces the coupling of the orbital and spin angular momenta to give a total angular momentum J = L + S. This results in a splitting of the Russell-Saunders multiplets into their components, each of which is labeled by the appropriate value of the total angular momentum quantum number J. The character of the matrix representative (MR) of the operator R(0 n) in the coupled representation is... 

Fig. 3.5 Schematic representation of the coupling of two electronic states by an oscillating electric field (q represents an electron in an excited state and q an electron in its ground state). 

The GRIND method assumes that the couples of nodes selected to represent a given distance in different compounds do actually represent the same kind of potential interaction with the receptor. This is often not true, for two reasons, as represented in Fig. 6.7. In the first situation (Fig. 6.7 (a)) all the compounds in the series contain alternative sites representing exactly the same distance and from which the candidate couples can be selected. Since the criteria for selecting the nodes is based only on the value of the MIF energy product, different sites can be selected in different compounds. The result is that the 3D graphic shows a non-consistent representation of the sites and can look messy. 

The third concept expression (4.36) therefore dispenses with The representation of the test data in this framework, Fig. 4.5, certainly proves that this waiver is unimportant the straight lines for water indicate a slope of 0.4-0.5 and that for salt solutions one of 0.7, as equations (4.28) and (4.29) suggest. The coupling of v both with the target quantity k a/v) and also with the process quantity (P/Vb) thus enables a simpler representation of the above dependences (a 2 parameter evaluation framework rather than a 3 parameter one). 

---