Test batteries Assessment Battery

Historically, the HRB NP test, the most widely used and well-validated of all NP test batteries, takes from 6 to 8 hours for complete administration. Reducing an established test battery to a 2- to 3-hour structured assessment procedure requires the use of selected subtests those most sensitive to PCP-induced brain dysfunction. The development and validation of briefer screening batteries, which represent a reduction in the total number of subtests used, professional time, and expense is an emergent trend (Hartlage and Mains 1982, Reynolds et al. 1983). Based on our literature review and results of a pilot sample study of 30 PCP and polydrug abusers, the following subtests are recommended for inclusion in a brief NP assessment battery. 

Although the novel AR protocol using citraconic anhydride improved the intensity of IHC on FFPE tissue sections for more than half of the antibodies tested, compared to that achieved by other conventional AR protocols, not all antibodies benefitted, which would argue that the citraconic anhydride method does not serve as a truly universal AR protocol. Indeed, many investigators (Table 1.2) have concluded that different antigens may require different specific AR protocols. In this respect, the test battery is a convenient and cost-effective method for assessing the appropriate AR protocol.2,8 Nevertheless, the present data certainly support inclusion of the citraconic anhydride AR method in such a test battery. With respect to the two heating temperatures for citraconic anhydride, the ultimate choice of method for any laboratory may depend on the equipment available. 

Luster, M.I. et al., Development of a testing battery to assess chemical-induced immunotoxicity National Toxicology Program s guidelines for immunotoxicity evaluation in mice, Fund. Appl. Toxicol., 10, 2, 1988. 

Luster, M.L., Munson, A.E., Thomas, P.T., Holsapple, M.P., Fenters, J.D., White, K.L., Jr., Lauer, L.D., Germolec, D.R., Rosenthal, G.J. and Dean, J.H. (1988). Development of a testing battery to assess chemical-induced immunotoxicity National Toxicology Program s Guidelines for Immunotoxicity Evaluation in Mice. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 10 2-19. 

Snyder FR, Davis FC, Henningfield JE. (1989). The tobacco withdrawal syndrome performance decrements assessed on a computerized test battery. Drug Alcohol Depend. 23(3) 259-66. 

Evaluating a Child. Parents will often bring their children with the expectation that someone can test them for ADHD. It is true that certain tests can help in the initial assessment however, no single test or even battery of tests can alone make the diagnosis. Instead, this diagnosis is made only after collecting a thorough database of information from the child, his/her parents, and teachers. 

Escher BI, Bramaz N, Richter M, Lienert J (2006) Comparative ecotoxicological hazard assessment of beta-blockers and their human metabolites using a mode-of-action-based test battery and a QSAR approachf. Environ Sci Technol 40 7402-7408... 

The Neurotoxicity Screening Battery test guideline (OPPTS 870.6200) consists of a functional observational battery, motor activity, and neuropathology. The test battery is not intended to provide a complete evaluation of neurotoxicity, and additional functional and morphological evaluation may be necessary to assess completely the neurotoxic potential of a chemical. 

The neurobehavioral test battery for early central nervous system assessment, is actually an adaptation of the human Brazelton test (18, 19). 

Other intelligence tests were considered for use in the RUPP Autism Network studies, but were not chosen for various reasons (Arnold et al., 2000). The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) General Cognitive Index is not strictly comparable to an IQ,... 

Fleishaker, J.C. et al., Psychomotor and memory effects of two adinazolam formulations assessed by a computerized neuropsychological test battery, J. Clin. Pharmacol., 33, 463, 1993. 

Most government-sponsored computerized performance test batteries are compilations of computer performance tests that were originally developed and tested in controlled laboratory settings. The purpose of many of these tests is to determine the effects of risk factors on fitness for government duty, and to assess the efficacy of countermeasures designed to offset the performance effects of these risk factors. 

The UTC-PAB is a library of cognitive tests that can be modified into smaller subsets or batteries for a specific purpose. The original UTC-PAB consisted of 25 tasks that were chosen due to their construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to levels of cognitive functioning. Several of the commonly known subsets or variations include the Testor s Workbench/Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (TWB/ANAM or ANAM) battery, the Naval Medical Research Institute Performance Assessment Battery (NMRI-PAB), the UTC-PAB/NATO AGARD STRES Battery, and the Criterion Task Set (CTS).43... 

---