Temporal arguments

The ionization of focal volume, or formation of plasma, is expected to alter the usual photochemical material modihcation pathway, as has been recently demonstrated in photopolymerization of SU-8 resist by femtosecond pulses [57]. In addition, nanometric-sized plasma regions created by the ionization, e.g., at defect sites, have spatio-temporal dynamics of their own. Recently, a model of nanosheet formation from plasma nanospheres in glass has been proposed [60]. Similar conditions are expected in polymers as well. Let us discuss here held enhancement by a metalhc nanoparticle (similar arguments are also valid for surfaces containing nanometric features). 

Most work has been performed on the yellow emission. The first ODMR in this area was by Glaser and co-workers [14-17], Two defects have been identified the effective mass donor, previously observed in EPR, and a deep donor (g = 1.989, g = 1.992). Glaser and co-workers have argued that the yellow luminescence is due to a two step process in which an electron is first transferred from a shallow donor to a deep ( 1 eV) double donor and then combines radiatively with a hole in a shallow acceptor to give the yellow luminescence. The argument is supported by results on n- [14-16] and prtype [15,16] samples (which support the double donor aspect of the argument) and the temporal evolution and excitation dependence of the ODMR [18]. 

The early triad biomimetic systems proved beyond argument the value of the multistep electron transfer strategy for temporal stabilization of photochemically generated charge-separated states. They have been followed by a large number of other triad and more complex systems that demonstrate new principles and approaches to electron transfer that may only be realized in systems including multiple donors and acceptors. Some of these will be illustrated below. 

Currently, there seems to be no quantitative microscopic theory for the cited laws [184,185,193] moreover, sometimes even the possibility of such a theory is denied [191-193]. The main argument is that a spatial inhomogeneity (e.g., a random distribution of impurities within a matrix, or of interatomic spacings in amorphous semiconductors) will necessarily result in an extremely broad range of microscopic transition rates. Hence, a spatial disorder is expected to induce a temporal energetic disorder. 

If fl = 1, every atom in the slider has the same velocity at every instant of time, once steady state (not necessarily smooth sliding) has been reached. Hence the problem is reduced to the motion of a single particle, for which one obtains Fj = 1. This provides an upper bound of Fj for arbitrary a. If the walls are incommensurate or disordered, one can again make use of the argument that the motion of all atoms relative to their preferred positions is the same up to temporal shifts once steady state has been reached. Owing to the incommensurability, the distribution of these temporal shifts with respect to a reference trajectory cannot change with time in the thermodynamic limit, and the instantaneous value of Fk is identical to Fk at all times. This gives a lower bound for Fj for arbitrary a. The static friction for arbitrary commensurability and/or finite systems lies in between the upper and the lower bound. 

It is evident from the above argument that the temporal variation of the mean-squared displacement of the reactants determines the asymptotic decay rates. For instance, if P (where the notation )) is used to denote ensemble averages over the different particles of a reactant species), then the concentrations decay as no t . Therefore it behooves us to determine the exponent 5 for diffusion in the fluctuating potential field. 

The case studies considered in the preceding two subsections have attempted to set the stage for the present chapter by concretely arguing for the idea that there are a number of problems in the study of materials that feature several scales (in space or time or both) simultaneously. Though our argument centered on the treatment of diffusion as an example of a proliferation of temporal scales and plasticity as an example of a proliferation of spatial scales, the situation is exacerbated yet further when we consider the action of plasticity induced by mass transport, such as the discussion of creep featured in section 11.3. Our main purpose has been to remind the reader from within the narrowly focused perspective of the study of materials that the proliferation of scales is an everyday challenge. 

---