Table of Correction Factors

Tschoegl, The Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior, Springer-Veilag to be published. 

Lcaderman, in Rheology. Vol. II, edited by F. R. Eirich, Academic Press, New York, 1958. 

Staverman and F. Schwarzl, in Die Physik der Hochpolymeren. edited by H. A. Stuart, Vol. IV, Chapter 1, Springcr-Vcrlag, Berlin, 1956. 

We now devote several chapters to the experimental determination of the viscoelastic properties whose general features have been surveyed in Chapter 2 and whose interrelations have been summarized in Chapters 3 and 4. 

As pointed out in Chapter 1, the forces and displacements which are measured in a mechanical experiment are related to the states of stress and strain by the constitutive equation which describes the viscoelastic properties sought, as well as the equations of motion and continuity (equations 1 and 2 of Chapter 1). Ordinarily, there is considerable simplification because there is no change in density with time, and because gravitational forces can be neglected. In transient experiments (creep and stress relaxation), inertial forces can also be neglected by suitable restriction of the time scale, eliminating short times. In periodic (oscillatory) experiments, inertial forces may or may not play an important role depending on the frequency, sample dimensions, and mechanical consistency as described in Section D below. 

---

The present book is organised in the form of main text, summaries, and appendices. To preserve the main idea of the individual chapters, additional material to the topics of secondary importance is presented in the appendices. There are also appendices to introduce fields which play a marginal role for this book. Some tables of correction factors for experimental methods, special functions, and data on surfactants and solvents have also been included. 

By 1953 a number of automated x-ray spectrometers were in use, of which the Philips Autrometer was typical. This 25-channel sequential machine was programmed by a combination of switches, servo-motors, and mechanical stops that required many hours of careful mechanical adjustment to set up. By the early 1960s multichannel spectrometers were also beginning to appear. With the need for greater accuracy, in x-ray fluorescence (XRF) especially, came the need for matrix correction. Early work at, for example, the British Non-Ferrous Metals Research Association, employed a table of correction factors that could be applied with a slide rule. From this grew the Lucas-Tooth/Price intensity correction models [3]— linear equations requiring only simple computers. Soon after came the concentration correction models of Lachance and Traill [4], and Rasberry and Heinrich [5]. These concentration correction models needed matrix inversion, thus more computation. Next came Criss s fundamental parameter approach [6], which derived from earlier work by Sherman [7]. 

Flammable atmospheres can be assessed using portable gas chromatographs or, for selected compounds, by colour indicator tubes. More commonly, use is made of explos-imeters fitted with Pellistors (e.g. platinum wire encased in beads of refractory material). The beads are arranged in a Wheatstone bridge circuit. The flammable gas is oxidized on the heated catalytic element, causing the electrical resistance to alter relative to the reference. Instruments are calibrated for specific compounds in terms of 0—100% of their lower flammable limit. Recalibration or application of correction factors is required for different gases. Points to consider are listed in Table 9.10. 

The approach of Hansch and Leo (1995) uses a small number of fragment values derived from very accurate partition coefficient measurements of a relatively small number of compounds, and requires a large number of correction factors. Some of the coefficient values are given in table 5.15. This approach has been designed for an automatic computer program that will do all the coefficients and corrections, called the CLOG. Hansch and Leo reported that for 7500 compounds tested, the correlation has a standard error of 0.336 and an = 0.978. 

As illustrated by the examples in Table 7.5, application of correction factors is necessary in those cases in which electronic and/or steric interactions of functional groups within a molecule influence the solvation of the compound. A positive correction factor is required if the interaction decreases the overall H-donor and/or... 

Table 7.5 Examples of Correction Factors, cj, for log Kiow Estimation at 25°C (Eqs. 7-15 and 7-16)a ...

In some cases, an "azimutal correction" was applied by the following method an azimutal plot of the diffracted intensity was obtained using a polar coordinates table. The corrective factor for "C/A" was e/e Q where is the area under the azimutal plot and is the area of the rectangle having the... 

As an example - to produce an overflow of 80 % passing 149 p (100 mesh), the multiplier from Table 3 at 80 % passing is 1.25. The micron size for the application is 149 p (100 mesh). The D50c required = 1.25 x 149 = 186 p for the application. The separation that a cyclone/hydroclone can achieve can be approximated from the following relation. The Dc50 (base) for a given diameter cyclone is multiplied times a series of correction factors designated by C, C2, and C3 ... 

Electron Microprobe Analysis of REE in Apatite, Monazite and Xenotime 349 Table 3. Correction factors for inter-element interference. 

Fig. 3. Apparent consumption of rapeseed oil and erucic acid by the Canadian population. (See Table VIII correction factors for waste in Table IV)...

A risk score will not necessarily gamer snpport for the removal or reduction of a potential hazard. The questions asked are, How mnch will it cost and How much hazard reduction will be derived from fixing the dangerous situation Fine (1973) went beyond the risk score and developed a Jnstification Formula. The formula includes factors for cost and the degree of correction. The resulting rating values for the cost and degree of correction factor can be extracted from Table 1.1. The Justification Formula is as follows ... 

Most tables of conversion factors do not include a conversion between m and ft but they do have a conversion between m and ft (3.28 ft = 1 m). To obtain the correct conversion factor, cube both sides of this eguivalence ... 

Note that there are a number of correction factors, such as the well-known Laplace correction, that can be applied to the cells of a contingency table to correct for empty cells. 

This is true in particular for the (erroneous) zero value of the hydrophobic constant of H (iTh = 0.00 by definition), the limited number of experimental log P values used to derive hydrophobic substituent constants, and the number of different tt scales needed to account for the complex electronic effects operating in polysubstituted aromatic compounds. Despite several attempts to extend the applicability of log P calculations using the Hansch-Fujita approach, for instance, by inclusion of correction factors" and better treatments of electronic effects , this approach has fallen into obso-lesence when it comes to calculating log P values. In contrast, the hydrophobic substituent constants (nx) of Table 1 continue to find use as structural parameters in some QSAR studies. ... 

In this equation, a is the number of occurrences of fragment fj, and b is the number of occurrences of correction factors F.. Like the it system of Hansch and Fujita, the fragmental methodology uses both additive terms (the hydro-phobic fragmental constants of Rekker as summarized in Table 2) and constitutive terms (the correction factors summarized in Table 3). 

The Derivation of Correction Factors 315 Table 12.5 pK Values for five-membered ring cyclic acylamidines. 

As in the case of capillary rise, Sugden [27] has made use of Bashforth s and Adams tables to calculate correction factors for this method. Because the figure is again one of revolution, the equation h = a lb + z is exact, where b is the value of / i = R2 at the origin and z is the distance of OC. The equation simply states that AP, expressed as height of a column of liquid, equals the sum of the hydrostatic head and the pressure... 

---