Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces thermodynamic potentials

In order to integrate the above expression, one needs to know how the viscosity, q, and the dielectric constant, e, change within the double layer. Had these two quantities maintained their bulk values all the way up to the x=0 surface, the macroscopic phase displacement velocity, o0, would have been determined solely by the surface thermodynamic potential, (p0, regardless of the potential distribution in the double layer. Experimental results... [Pg.358]

Although liquid Hg would never be used as a reference (model) surface in surface physics because its liquid state and high vapor pressure do not allow appropriate UHV conditions, this metal turns out to be a reference surface in electrochemistry for precisely the same reasons reproducibility of the surface state, easy cleaning of its surface, and the possibility of measuring the surface tension (surface thermodynamic conditions). In particular, the establishment of a UHV scale for potentials is at present based on data obtained for Hg. [Pg.16]

The valence band structure of very small metal crystallites is expected to differ from that of an infinite crystal for a number of reasons (a) with a ratio of surface to bulk atoms approaching unity (ca. 2 nm diameter), the potential seen by the nearly free valence electrons will be very different from the periodic potential of an infinite crystal (b) surface states, if they exist, would be expected to dominate the electronic density of states (DOS) (c) the electronic DOS of very small metal crystallites on a support surface will be affected by the metal-support interactions. It is essential to determine at what crystallite size (or number of atoms per crystallite) the electronic density of sates begins to depart from that of the infinite crystal, as the material state of the catalyst particle can affect changes in the surface thermodynamics which may control the catalysis and electro-catalysis of heterogeneous reactions as well as the physical properties of the catalyst particle [26]. [Pg.78]

The Parsons function is defined through = 7 + it is the thermodynamic potential that has the charge density a as the basic variable instead of the potential (j>. Show that the surface excess of a... [Pg.226]

In order to prove this relation, we introduce an auxiliary thermodynamic potential related to the surface tension 7 ... [Pg.250]

It may be derived that elemental sulphur is not the final product of surface oxidation of sphalerite, because the potential associated with the second anode peak corresponds to the thermodynamic potential of the reaction (3-1 la) (taking potential barrier of SO into consideration). [Pg.143]

If when a metal comes into contact with an electrolyte, e.g. mercury in contact with dilute sulphuric acid containing mercurous sulphate it is not at the electrical potential necessary for equilibrium the thermodynamic potential of the metallic ions in the two phases will differ and consequently some of them will pass across the boundary or compensating adjustment of the surface will take place. [Pg.216]

The dissolution reaction is Pt - Pt2+ + 2e and the value of its reversible thermodynamic potential is 1.2 V on the normal hydrogen scale. The evolution of O2 in acid solution at a current density of, say, 100 mA cm, needs an overpotential on platinum of nearly 1.0 V, i.e., the electrode potential would be >2.0 V. It follows feat at these very anodic potentials platinum would tend to dissolve, although its dissolution would be slowed down by fee fact feat it forms an oxide film at fee potentials concerned. Nevertheless, fee facts stated show feat fee alleged stability of Pt may be more limited than is often thought. This is an important practical conclusion because dissolved Pt from an anode may deposit on fee cathode of fee cell, and instead of having fee surface one started wife as fee cathode, it becomes in fact what is on its surface, platinum. [Pg.569]

Various types of molecular interactions which occur in mixed mono-layers can be distinguished by simultaneous measurements of the surface pressure, potential, and fluidity of monolayers. Limitations of Goodrich s thermodynamic treatment of mixed monolayers are mentioned. Surface properties of cholesterol have been correlated with its function in biomembranes. [Pg.214]

To carry out the proof, we note that the LMA equations are equivalent to imposing an extremum on some function of the concentrations—the free energy F for v = const or the thermodynamic potential for p = const. It is in precisely this way, as is well known, that the LMA may be derived from general thermodynamic principles. We will solve the problem if we prove that the surface F or, under the conditions imposed on the concentration and for constant v or p, has one and only one minimum, and does not have either maxima or any other critical points (so-called minimax, or saddle points). [Pg.144]

Developments in the study of carbocations in superacid media over the past 30 years have been reviewed.1 The thermodynamics [AG(g)] of the reaction R+(g) + Rref OH(g) -> ROH(g) + R+ref(g) involving Rref = f-butyl and 21 R+ has been studied by high-level computation.2 A plot of AG(g) versus AG(solution) shows an excellent correlation, except for phenyl-substituted R+, which form a separate correlation family. The magnitude of the most positive surface electrostatic potential was proposed as an effective measure of the stability of gas-phase carbocations, with results presented for a number of structurally diverse cations.3 The electrostatic potential directly... [Pg.203]

Corrosion occurs wherever there is a metal, the thermodynamic potential of which (on the normal hydrogen scale) is negative to that of some partner reaction. This chapter contains many graphic (and some unexpected) examples of practical corrosion, e.g., drops of moisture condensing on a metal surface tend to stimulate corrosion in the metal underneath the drop. [Pg.260]

On the base of this approach thermodynamics of hydrogen absorbed outside and inside the (10,10) and the (20,20) single-wall carbon nanotubes with diameters 13.56 A and 27.13 A, respectively, was calculated. The dependencies of free energy F and thermodynamical potential H on applied pressure P and temperature T were calculated. The dependencies of content of hydrogen adsorbed on nanotubes m(P,T) surface on pressure and temperature were calculated from these data. For the first time the dependencies of m(P,T) with accounting of quantum effects and van der Waals forces were calculated. [Pg.131]

Figure 2. The enthalpy H and its harmonic approximation U, in the vicinity of the minimum, for planar, rigid surfaces separated by a distance d (CE = 0.1 M, 11= 1 x 104 N/m2, T = 3.3 x 10 mol/m2, KD = 0.5 M, b, = 3.08 x 10 22J,b2= 6.28 x 10 14 J/m, b3 = 8.28 x 107 J/m, 64 = 6.13 x 1016 J/m2, br, = -9.00 x 10 23 J, and T = 300 Kj. pi is the distribution of the intersurface distances for interfaces with bending modulus Kc = 2 kT interacting via the potential C/h. This distribution coincides with the Boltzmann distribution of finite pieces of area A. p2 is the Boltzmann distribution of the pieces of area A, but now the enthalpy H and not its harmonic approximation U, is the thermodynamic potential. p3 is calculated using for A the value obtained from the minimization of the Gibbs free energy (eq 11a). Figure 2. The enthalpy H and its harmonic approximation U, in the vicinity of the minimum, for planar, rigid surfaces separated by a distance d (CE = 0.1 M, 11= 1 x 104 N/m2, T = 3.3 x 10 mol/m2, KD = 0.5 M, b, = 3.08 x 10 22J,b2= 6.28 x 10 14 J/m, b3 = 8.28 x 107 J/m, 64 = 6.13 x 1016 J/m2, br, = -9.00 x 10 23 J, and T = 300 Kj. pi is the distribution of the intersurface distances for interfaces with bending modulus Kc = 2 kT interacting via the potential C/h. This distribution coincides with the Boltzmann distribution of finite pieces of area A. p2 is the Boltzmann distribution of the pieces of area A, but now the enthalpy H and not its harmonic approximation U, is the thermodynamic potential. p3 is calculated using for A the value obtained from the minimization of the Gibbs free energy (eq 11a).
The electrostatic free energy contribution is the sum of the electrostatic energy of the solution and the chemical contribution of the surface, if the potential determining ions are in thermodynamic equilibrium with those in solution. At constant surface electrical potential Pq, the chemical contribution is given by... [Pg.669]

For an electrochemical reaction, O + ne R, at equilibrium, the forward reaction rate equals the backward reaction rate, the net reaction rate is 0, and no net electric current is produced. The potential at equilibrium is the Nemst potential or thermodynamic potential as expressed in Equations 1.30 and 1.31. To obtain a net current from the reaction, as shown in Equation 1.37, the potential apphed to the electrode surface should shift away from the Nemst potential the difference between the applied potential and the Nemst potential is called overpotential ... [Pg.17]

Figure 1.15 shows a potential sweep cycle, the electrochemical response with the cycle, and the surface concentration profile in the potential sweep. A cyclic voltammogram can give information about the thermodynamic potential, diffusion coefficient, kinetics, and reversibility of the reaction. [Pg.24]

We take up this topic not only because of its intrinsic interest, but because it is pedagogically valuable to note the various descriptions that arise from the multitude of available choices for the basic thermodynamic potential functions. The system under consideration consists of a thin layer of atoms held on the surface of a solid or liquid exposed to a gas phase. The solid or liquid is termed the adsorbent. whereas the material held on the surface is called the adsorbate the process by which the thin surface layer is formed from the transfer of gas molecules to the surface phase is called adsorption. [Pg.458]

During surface reactions the substrate, the intermediates, or both, interact strongly with the electrode and diffusion is restricted. The reactions of intermediates generated under these conditions can be expected to differ substantially from those in homogeneous solution. Electrode potentials measured under such conditions cannot be equated to thermodynamic potentials for the formation of the intermediates. Likewise, it is not possible to make kinetic measurements on the reactions of the intermediates which give information relating to the homogeneous solution chemistry. [Pg.133]


See other pages where Surfaces thermodynamic potentials is mentioned: [Pg.226]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.926]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.26]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.567 ]




SEARCH



Potential energy surface extracting thermodynamic

Potential energy surface thermodynamic quantities

Surface Thermodynamic

Surfaces, thermodynamics

Thermodynamic potentials

Thermodynamics potential energy surfaces

Thermodynamics potentials

© 2024 chempedia.info