Potential energy surface thermodynamic quantities

Potential energy surfaces or profiles are descriptions of reactions at the molecular level. In practice, experimental observations are usually of the behaviour of very large numbers of molecules in solid, liquid, gas or solution phases. The link between molecular descriptions and macroscopic measurements is provided by transition state theory, whose premise is that activated complexes which form from reactants are in equilibrium with the reactants, both in quantity and in distribution of internal energies, so that the conventional relationships of thermodynamics can be applied to the hypothetical assembly of transition structures. 

Most systematic studies on gas-phase SN2 reactions have been carried out with methyl halides, substrates which are free of complications due to competing elimination. Application of the Marcus rate-equilibrium formalism to the double-minimum potential energy surface led to the development of a model for intrinsic nucleophilicity in S 2 reactions233. The key quantities in this model are the central energy barriers, Eq, to degenerate reactions, like the one of equation 22, which are free of a thermodynamic driving force. 

Potential energy surfaces of weakly bound dimers and trimers are the key quantities needed to compute transition frequencies in the high resolution spectra, (differential and integral) scattering cross sections or rate coefficients describing collisional processes between the molecules, or some thermodynamic properties needed to derive equations of state for condensed phases. However, some other quantities governed by weak intermolecular forces are needed to describe intensities in the spectra or, more generally, infrared and Raman spectra of unbound (collisional complexes) of two molecules, and dielectric and refractive properties of condensed phases. These are the interaction-induced (or collision-induced) dipole moments and polarizabilities. 

The difference between the nature of the products in reaction (1) vs. reactions (2) and (3) can be partially rationalized using thermodynamic and symmetry arguments. If one assumes that the dissociations occur adiabatically, then for each excited parent the symmetry requirements are such that the accessible states for the products indicated in (l)-(3) are lower in energy than the alternatives. This will be discussed in more detail in later sections however, it is important to note at this juncture that such arguments tell us little about energy barriers, the nature of transition states, radiationless transitions, or related quantities of interest with regard to the kinetics of photodissociation. For these quantities one needs reliable potential energy surfaces. 

The thermodynamic quantity 0y is a reduced standard-state chemical potential difference and is a function only of T, P, and the choice of standard state. The principal temperature dependence of the liquidus and solidus surfaces is contained in 0 j. The term is the ratio of the deviation from ideal-solution behavior in the liquid phase to that in the solid phase. This term is consistent with the notion that only the difference between the values of the Gibbs energy for the solid and liquid phases determines which equilibrium phases are present. Expressions for the limits of the quaternary phase diagram are easily obtained (e.g., for a ternary AJB C system, y = 1 and xD = 0 for a pseudobinary section, y = 1, xD = 0, and xc = 1/2 and for a binary AC system, x = y = xAC = 1 and xB = xD = 0). 

We now return to the definition of the surface excess chemical potential fta given by Equation (2.19) where the partial differentiation of the surface excess Helmholtz energy, Fa, with respect to the surface excess amount, rf, is carried out so that the variables T and A remain constant. This partial derivative is generally referred to as a differential quantity (Hill, 1949 Everett, 1950). Also, for any surface excess thermodynamic quantity Xa, there is a corresponding differential surface excess quantity xa. (According to the mathematical convention, the upper point is used to indicate that we are taking the derivative.) So we may write ... 

The values of Vm and are key experimental quantities that are used to characterize the physical properties of semiconductor/metal interfaces. If Vbi or b can be determined, then W, Q, E(x), and most of the other important thermodynamic quantities that are relevant to the electrical properties of the semiconductor contact can be readily calculated using the simple equations that have been presented above. Methods to determine these important parameters can be found in the literature. However, it would be useful at this point in the discussion to consider what values of and Vbi are expected theoretically for a given semiconductor/metal interface. By definition, = (/ip.m - at the electrode surface (Figure 4b). Thus, in principle, the barrier height can be predicted if the energies of the semiconductor band edges and the electrochemical potential of the metal can be determined with respect to a common reference energy. 

Other thermodynamic quantities that can be evaluated equally well by Monte Carlo and by MD simulations include the molar energy of adsorption, which is just the total potential energy of the adsorbed particles divided by their number, for a classical system [7] the surface tension of the adsorbed fUm [3] and the pressure normal to the surface. In principle, the dependence of the normal component of the pressure tensor upon amount adsorbed could be used to construct an adsorption isotherm since this pressure must be independent of distance from the surface in order to maintain mechanical equilibrium [3,7]. Thus, fer from the surface it must be equal to the bulk gas pressure. However, in practice the normal pressure is hard to evaluate with sufficient accuracy to be useful in an isotherm calculation, especially at the temperatures at or below the normal boiling point of the bulk... 

The discussed calculation procedure is not based on any extrathermodynamic assumptions and therefore the inaccuracy of the result obtained is determined only by the experimental errors of measuring a work function and the Volta potential difference. Furthermore, from the solvent surface potential x determined by any estimation method we can find the ideal solvent-electron interaction energy Vq = U — ex . Unlike U , V, is not a strictly thermodynamic quantity and the inaccuracy in determining it, besides experimental errors, is caused by the inaccuracy of model assumptions made for estimating x -... 

The proposed approach leads directly to practical results such as the prediction—based upon the chemical potential—of whether or not a reaction runs spontaneously. Moreover, the chemical potential is key in dealing with physicochemical problems. Based upon this central concept, it is possible to explore many other fields. The dependence of the chemical potential upon temperature, pressure, and concentration is the gateway to the deduction of the mass action law, the calculation of equilibrium constants, solubilities, and many other data, the construction of phase diagrams, and so on. It is simple to expand the concept to colligative phenomena, diffusion processes, surface effects, electrochemical processes, etc. Furthermore, the same tools allow us to solve problems even at the atomic and molecular level, which are usually treated by quantum statistical methods. This approach allows us to eliminate many thermodynamic quantities that are traditionally used such as enthalpy H, Gibbs energy G, activity a, etc. The usage of these quantities is not excluded but superfluous in most cases. An optimized calculus results in short calculations, which are intuitively predictable and can be easily verified. 

Here p, p, T, p. indicate the pressure, mass density, temperature and chemical potential of the adsorbate at location x = (xi, X2, X3). T is the temperature of the sorptive fluid. The quantity O = 0(x) is the potential energy per unit mass at location (x) of the surface forces of the sorbent atoms. As this quantity normally is an unknown function of space coordinates (x), so are the local thermodynamic quantities (p, p,T, p). For given model function of the surface... 

From (9) and (10) the Helmholtz energy is obtained and from that all relevant mechanical and thermodynamic quantities, including the pressure, density and the chemical potential of each component, the properties of water near surfaces, etc. 

U + PV, or the continuum solid mechanics, the LBA approach in terms of bond length and bond energy and their response to atomic CN, temperature, and stress are appropriate for substances at all scales. Instead of the classical statistic thermodynamic quantities such as entropy S that is suitable for a body with infinitely large number of atoms, here considers only the reduced specific heat per bond, f/CT/ o). Neither the chemical potential /i for the component n, nor the tension cr of a given surface are needed in the current approach. Here one needs considering only the specific heat per coordinate. 

A general prerequisite for the existence of a stable interface between two phases is that the free energy of formation of the interface be positive were it negative or zero, fluctuations would lead to complete dispersion of one phase in another. As implied, thermodynamics constitutes an important discipline within the general subject. It is one in which surface area joins the usual extensive quantities of mass and volume and in which surface tension and surface composition join the usual intensive quantities of pressure, temperature, and bulk composition. The thermodynamic functions of free energy, enthalpy and entropy can be defined for an interface as well as for a bulk portion of matter. Chapters II and ni are based on a rich history of thermodynamic studies of the liquid interface. The phase behavior of liquid films enters in Chapter IV, and the electrical potential and charge are added as thermodynamic variables in Chapter V. 

Of the three quantities (temperature, energy, and entropy) that appear in the laws of thermodynamics, it seems on the surface that only energy has a clear definition, which arises from mechanics. In our study of thermodynamics a number of additional quantities will be introduced. Some of these quantities (for example, pressure, volume, and mass) may be defined from anon-statistical (non-thermodynamic) perspective. Others (for example Gibbs free energy and chemical potential) will require invoking a statistical view of matter, in terms of atoms and molecules, to define them. Our goals here are to see clearly how all of these quantities are defined thermodynamically and to make use of relationships between these quantities in understanding how biochemical systems behave. 

---