Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces parametric form

Figure 32. Schematic diagram of a surface expressed in a parametric form p (u, v) and a sectioning plane, which is comprised of e and p (0, v). p (0,0) is a point of interest at which the local curvatures are determined [7]. Figure 32. Schematic diagram of a surface expressed in a parametric form p (u, v) and a sectioning plane, which is comprised of e and p (0, v). p (0,0) is a point of interest at which the local curvatures are determined [7].
One procedure is to assume a parametrized form of the particle distribution function n[z) and compare the predictions of Eq. (8) to the measured scattered intensity to estimate the values of the parameters. This procedure was used to characterize the interaction of the interface with particles in a flowing stream above an interface [I2. There was no adsorption of particles on the surface, and the particle distribution function was obtained from a solution of a mass transport equation with a term describing the interaction with the interface. The analysis yielded estimates of the parameters in the interaction potential [12. ... [Pg.182]

Here, is the dimensionless surface potential and is the value of d>j for h o°. Equation 5.179 expresses the dependence riei(/ ) in a parametric form riei(0), hifd). Fixed surface potential or charge means that or s, does not depend on the film thickness h. The latter is important to be specified when integrating H(h) or f(h) (in accordance with Equations 5.162 to 5.165) to calculate the interaction energy. [Pg.200]

Consider a diatomic, AB, interacting with a surface, S. The basic idea is to utilize valence bond theory for the atom-surface interactions, AB and BS> along with AB to construct AB,S For each atom of the diatomic, we associate a single electron. Since association of one electron with each body in a three-body system allows only one bond, and since the solid can bind both atoms simultaneously, two valence electrons are associated with the solid. Physically, this reflects the ability of the infinite solid to donate and receive many electrons. The use of two electrons for the solid body and two for the diatomic leads to a four-body LEPS potential (Eyring et al. 1944) that is convenient mathematically, but contains nonphysical bonds between the two electrons in the solid. These are eliminated, based upon the rule that each electron can only interact with an electron on a different body, yielding the modified four-body LEPS form. One may also view this as an empirical parametrized form with a few parameters that have well-controlled effects on the global PES. [Pg.191]

D CAD/modeler Free-form surfaces, parametric geometry, trim curves, surface/material properties, assembly information Tessellation (static dynamic), data reduction (LOD), siuface properties — > textures, materials, reflection mapping... [Pg.2519]

Attempts have been made to interpret many of the experiments according to the optical model of Fernbach, Berber and Taylor [7], which was first proposed to explain the data of Cook et al. (see Table 4). They employed a model which is only a first approximation even optically and neglected refraction and reflection at the nuclear surface. The parameters of their model are Tq, K, and ki. Tq is the radius parameter in the relationship R = r A ior a sphere of radius R with uniform density. K is the reciprocal mean free path, and %k- is the increase in the momentum of the neutron which occurs when it enters the nucleus (see Beet. 8). The values of these parameters which were assumed or determined in interpreting the experimental data are listed in the last three columns of Table 4. The values are the best values for the simple optical model the model of Fernbach et al. [7] is very appealing as a parametric form for representing the data however some of the authors object to the values of the parameters they obtain. For example Fox et al. (see Table 4) obtain a value of A which is above that... [Pg.482]

The LVC and QVC approaches avoid the explicit construction of diabatic states because they result in a parametrized form of the adiabatic PES this can be used to determine the coupling parameters by comparing the parametrized form of the adiabatic PES with results from electronic structure calculations for these surfaces (diabatization by ansatz [26]). On the other hand, the fixed functional form leads to a model shape of the PES which may not always be flexible enough to reproduce these data well. To overcome this limitation, a modified construction scheme for the diabatic potential matrix has been introduced [27,28] where the LVC approach is applied to the adiabatic-to-diabatic (ADT) mixing angle only . In this form it can... [Pg.153]

The control points are defined by the basis set of points P. These control points define the parametric bicubic patches which form the surface model. Advantages of the parametric bicubic surface include continuity of position, slope, and curvature at the points where two patches meet. All the points on a bicubic surface are de by cubic equations of two parameters s and t, where s and t vary from 0 to 1. The equation for x s,t) is ... [Pg.151]

The major hurdle to overcome in the development of 3D-QSAR models using steric, electrostatic, or lipophilic fields is related to both conformation selection and subsequent suitable overlay (alignment) of compounds. Therefore, it is of some interest to provide a conformation-ally sensitive lipophilicity descriptor that is alignment-independent. In this chapter we describe the derivation and parametrization of a new descriptor called 3D-LogP and demonstrate both its conformational sensitivity and its effectiveness in QSAR analysis. The 3D-LogP descriptor provides such a representation in the form of a rapidly computable description of the local lipophilicity at points on a user-defined molecular surface. [Pg.215]

Unlike the curves you may have seen in geometry books (such as bullet-shaped paraboloids and saddle surfaces) that are simple functions of x and y, certain surfaces occupying three dimensions can be expressed by parametric equations of the form x = f(u,v), y = g(u,v), z = h(u,v). This means that the position of a point in the third dimension is determined by three separate formulas. Because g, and h can be anything you like, the remarkable panoply of art forms made possible by plotting these surfaces is quite large. For simplicity, you can plot projections of these surfaces in the x-y plane simply by plotting (x,y) as you iterate u and in a... [Pg.185]

Several empirical and semiempirical interatomic potentials have been developed for the Si H systembased on extensions and modifications of well-known potentials for Si including up to three-body interactions (StilUnger and Weber, 1985 Biswas and Hamann, 1985 Biswas et al., 1987 Mousseau and Lewis, 1991 Baskes, 1992). Recent atomic-scale simulation work of plasma-surface interactions in the PECVD of Si thin films has been based on an empirical description of interatomic interactions in the Si H system according to Tersoff s (1986, 1988, 1989) potential for Si, as extended by Ohira and co-workers (1994, 1995, 1996) to incorporate Si-H, H-H, and the corresponding three-body interactions. The extension of the potential to include the presence of hydrogen adopted the Tersoff parametrization to fit results of ab initio calculations for the structure and energetics of Sil 1., x <4, species in the gas phase (Ohira et al., 1994,1995,1996). A similar form of... [Pg.259]

Let us consider surfaces in a Cartesian frame, whence these results can be generalized to any set of three coordinates x in an arbitrary coordinate system fixed in space. A surface in 3D space can generally be defined in several different ways. Explicitly, z = F x,y), implicitly, f x,y,z) = 0 or parametrically by defining a set of parametric equations of the form x = x C, rf), y = y C, v), z = z (, p) which contain two independent parameters Q, p called surface coordinates or curvilinear coordinates of a point on the surface. In this coordinate system a curve on the surface is defined by a relation f Q, p) = Q between the curvilinear coordinates. By eliminating the parameters Q, p one can derive... [Pg.374]

These equations form a parametric representation for the integral surface z = z(x ... ), provided that the parametric variables in the initial conditions can be inverted to obtain (i ... as functions of This is the case when the Jacobian... [Pg.118]


See other pages where Surfaces parametric form is mentioned: [Pg.348]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.289]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Parametric

Parametrization

© 2024 chempedia.info