Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface state depth

Like CO oxidation on Ru, the understanding for ethylene epoxidation on Ag has continued to evolve. Many questions remain open, including the reaction mechanism on the Ag structures, and the role of intercalated oxygen atoms. Another dimension that is little explored so far is the surface states in a combined oxygen-ethylene atmosphere. Greeley et al. have reported recently that an ethylenedioxy intermediate may be present at appreciable coverage under industrial reaction conditions, the effect of which on the structure of the surface is unknown. More importantly, the implication of a dynamic co-existence of various surface oxides under reaction conditions for the reaction mechanism needs to be explored and understood at greater depth. [Pg.142]

There have been several proposed mechanisms for the operation of these sensors (Gopel, 1985 Franke et al., 2006). They all seem to converge on the existence and modulation of the Schottky barrier heterojunctions formed between the grains of the polycrystalline layer. They are equivalent to a chain of resistive elements connected in series. The density of surface states affects the depth of the Schottky barrier and depends on the interaction with the adsorbate (Fig. 8.8). The size of the grains apparently plays a major role. As the diameter of the grains decreases to below 5 nm, the space charge is smeared and the relative response of the sensor increases (Fig. 8.9). [Pg.252]

Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) is particularly suited for surface analysis (depth 0.5-1 nm). AES depth profile analysis was employed to determine the thickness and composition of surface reaction layers formed under test conditions in the Reichert wear apparatus in the presence of four different ZDDPs additives at different applied loads (Schumacher et al., 1980). Using elemental sensitivity factors the concentration of the four elements (S, P, O, C) was determined at three locations corresponding to a depth of 1.8, 4.3, and 17 nm. No significant correlation between wear behavior and carbon or oxygen content of the reaction layer was observed. A steady state sulfur concentration is reached after a very short friction path. Contrary to the behavior of sulfur, phosphorus concentration in the presence of ZDDPs increases steadily with friction path, and no plateau value is reached. [Pg.157]

Photoemission experiments are sensitive only to states that are close to the surface because of the short escape depth of the electrons. The escape depth varies with energy and is only aobut 10 A at 10-100 eV, increasing to 40-50 A above 1 keV, so that the larger energies tend to be more appropriate for the study of bulk properties. Surface states usually extend no more than 5-7 A into the bulk and so their contribution should be small in the XPS spectra. However, in view of the growth process of a-Si H and the effects of hydrogen near the... [Pg.68]

DEPTH OF SURFACE STATE AND INFLUENCE OF BULK PHASE... [Pg.492]

Equation 9.4 provides a relationship between time and the distance at which a particular concentration is achieved. When clearance rates are small relative to diffusion rateS/ it states that the distance from the surface (penetration depth) at which a particular concentration C is achieved advances as the square root of time. In other wordS/ to double the penetration of a compound/ the exposure time must quadruple. Equation 9.5 states that/ given sufficient time and negligible plasma concentration/ most compounds will develop a semilogarithmic concentration profile whose slope is determined by the ratio of the clearance rate to the diffusion constant. Note also that the distance over which the concentration decreases to... [Pg.109]

Previous discussion has indicated that unmetabolized small molecular weight, hydrophilic molecules (MW < 500) typically penetrate tissues to (half-surface-concentration) depths that range at steady state from 0.1 to 1 mm. The depth is on the order of 0.1 mm for most tissues of the body, as we have seen in the case... [Pg.114]

To make matters worse, the nonideal behavior of semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces as noted above is exacerbated when the latter are irradiated. Changes in the occupancy of these states cause further changes in Fh so that the semiconductor surface band-edge positions are different in the dark and under illumination. These complications are considered later. The surface states as considered above are shallow (with respect to the band-edge positions) and can essentially be considered as completely ionized at room temperature. However, for many oxide semiconductors, the trap states may be deep and therefore are only partially ionized. Specifically, they may be disposed with respect to the semiconductor Fermi level such that they are ionized only to a depth that is small relative to W [49]. The manifestation of such deep traps in the AC impedance behavior of semiconductor electrolyte interfaces has been discussed [14, 49]. [Pg.2667]

Fig. 3. (a) Steady-state depth composition profile of an originally crystalline silicon surface that has been exposed to a chlorine plasma, obtained from angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, (b) Corresponding side-view schematics of near-surface atomic coordination left, 280-eV ions right, 40-eV ions. (From Layadi et al., 1997.)... [Pg.156]

Figure 6. Effects of UVR on photosynthesis (total C assimilation) of phytoplankton moved through different mixing depths, presented as per cent photosynthesis in quartz (UVR transparent) relative to glass (partial UVR exclusion) bottles. Measured rates are for bottles that were circulated over the indicated depth ranges at the rate of once per 4 min (0-2 m), once per 8 min (0-3.9 m) and once per 20 min (0-10 and 0-14 m) for a 4 h midday incubation period. The modeled rates are the average of the steady-state (irradiance based) photosynthesis predicted using a biological weighting function and photosynthesis irradiance (BWF/P-I) curve applied to in situ irradiance estimated from recorded surface irradiance, depth of the bottles and measured vertical extinction coefficient. Model and measurements agree within measurement variability (ca. 10%) except for the 0-10 m incubation. Experiments were conducted in Lake Lucerne on September 13,1999 (no asterisks) and September 15,1999 (asterisks, see exposure data in Figure 2). [Modified from Kohler et al. 79.]... Figure 6. Effects of UVR on photosynthesis (total C assimilation) of phytoplankton moved through different mixing depths, presented as per cent photosynthesis in quartz (UVR transparent) relative to glass (partial UVR exclusion) bottles. Measured rates are for bottles that were circulated over the indicated depth ranges at the rate of once per 4 min (0-2 m), once per 8 min (0-3.9 m) and once per 20 min (0-10 and 0-14 m) for a 4 h midday incubation period. The modeled rates are the average of the steady-state (irradiance based) photosynthesis predicted using a biological weighting function and photosynthesis irradiance (BWF/P-I) curve applied to in situ irradiance estimated from recorded surface irradiance, depth of the bottles and measured vertical extinction coefficient. Model and measurements agree within measurement variability (ca. 10%) except for the 0-10 m incubation. Experiments were conducted in Lake Lucerne on September 13,1999 (no asterisks) and September 15,1999 (asterisks, see exposure data in Figure 2). [Modified from Kohler et al. 79.]...
Until recently, analytical investigations of surfaces were handicapped by the lack of suitable methods and instrumentation capable of supplying reliable and relevant information. Electron diffraction is an excellent way to determine the geometric arrangement of the atoms on a surface, but it does not answer the question as to the chemical composition of the upper atomic layer. The use of the electron microprobe (EMP), a powerful instrument for chemical analyses, is unfortunately limited because of its extended information depth. The first real success in the analysis of a surface layer was achieved by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) [16,17], followed a little later by other techniques such as electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) and secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), etc. [18-23]. All these techniques use some type of emission (photons, electrons, atoms, molecules, ions) caused by excitation of the surface state. Each of these techniques provides a substantial amount of information. To obtain the optimum Information it is, however, often beneficial to combine several techniques. [Pg.42]

Fig. 4.15 Left constant-current topograph U = —0.3 V, / = 0.03 nA) of a three monolayer high Gd island on W(llO) after an hydrogen exposure of 1.6 L and subsequently of 1 L (cf. Fig. 4.13). Clean Gd is marked by A, the hydrogen affected areas by B. Middle line section of the clusters (line a). The width and the height are nearly uniform and amount to 35 and 4 A. respectively. Right the suppression of the surface state due to hydrogen adsorption results in a collapsed looking area. The depth of this purely electronically induced depression amounts to about 1.4 A as being obvious fl om the line scan (line b). Reprinted with permission from [3]. Copyright (1999) by the American Physical Society... Fig. 4.15 Left constant-current topograph U = —0.3 V, / = 0.03 nA) of a three monolayer high Gd island on W(llO) after an hydrogen exposure of 1.6 L and subsequently of 1 L (cf. Fig. 4.13). Clean Gd is marked by A, the hydrogen affected areas by B. Middle line section of the clusters (line a). The width and the height are nearly uniform and amount to 35 and 4 A. respectively. Right the suppression of the surface state due to hydrogen adsorption results in a collapsed looking area. The depth of this purely electronically induced depression amounts to about 1.4 A as being obvious fl om the line scan (line b). Reprinted with permission from [3]. Copyright (1999) by the American Physical Society...

See other pages where Surface state depth is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.93]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.492 , Pg.493 ]




SEARCH



Surface states

© 2024 chempedia.info