Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface silanols comparison

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography shape-recognition processes are distinctly limited to describe the enhanced separation of geometric isomers or structurally related compounds that result primarily from the differences between molecular shapes rather than from additional interactions within the stationary-phase and/or silica support. For example, residual silanol activity of the base silica on nonend-capped polymeric Cis phases was found to enhance the separation of the polar carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin [29]. In contrast, the separations of both the nonpolar carotenoid probes (a- and P-carotene and lycopene) and the SRM 869 column test mixture on endcapped and nonendcapped polymeric Cig phases exhibited no appreciable difference in retention. The nonpolar probes are subject to shape-selective interactions with the alkyl component of the stationary-phase (irrespective of endcapping), whereas the polar carotenoids containing hydroxyl moieties are subject to an additional level of retentive interactions via H-bonding with the surface silanols. Therefore, a direct comparison between the retention behavior of nonpolar and polar carotenoid solutes of similar shape and size that vary by the addition of polar substituents (e.g., dl-trans P-carotene vs. dll-trans P-cryptoxanthin) may not always be appropriate in the context of shape selectivity. [Pg.244]

Technological development has not been equally intensive over the entire GC field. An area in which surprisingly little has happened during recent years is the further development of the separation columns where there are still some problems. A major problem concerns the properties of modern columns. Because of the presence of silanol groups, the surface of the fused-silica tubing is acidic. Such surface silanols have to be more or less entirely removed to be able to elute basic compounds from the column. In a recent comparison of commercially available columns, it was shown that these are not entirely satisfactory concerning... [Pg.673]

The comparison of MTS and of silica gels in terms of residual alkoxy arms and of enantiomeric excess shows that the basic treatment is not necessary for the former solids. This result can be explained either by the nature of the surface silanols or by the hexagonal structure of the MTS pores. [Pg.491]

A pure silica MCM-48 is activated by a controlled dispersion of A1 onto the substrate surface performed by anchoring of the Al(acac)3 complex onto the surface silanols. A calcination step removes the organic ligands. The characteristics of the final structure are evaluated by comparison with A1 incorporated MCM-48. The type and concentration of Lewis/Br0nsted acid sites is investigated by the adsorption of NH3 and CD3CN. [Pg.179]

The thermal decomposition of 2-CEES on nanocrystalhne zeohtes was probed by FTIR spectroscopy. Comparison of the reactivy of nanocrystaUine NaZSM-5, silicalite and NaY indicated that NaZSM-5 was most effective for 2-CEES thermal oxidation and that external surface silanol sites were important to the zeolite reactivity. The adsorption and reaction of DMMP on nanocrystalline NaY was investigated using FTIR and sohd state NMR spectroscopy. External surface silanol and EFAL sites were implicated in the thermal oxidation of DMMP on nanocrystaUine NaY. Thus, the nanocrystalline zeolites can be envisioned as new bifunctional catalyst materials with active sites on the external surface playing an important role in the intrinsic reactivity of the material. Future studies will focus on optimizing the activity of nanocrystaUine zeolites for CWA decontamination apphcations by taUoring the surface properties. [Pg.259]

The term detennines the compaction of the adsorption layer. All the parameters shown in Table 1.5 are in correlation because a decrease in the content of silanols leads to diminution of the chanical potential and the surface becomes less active in the adsorption of polar (water) or nonpolar (nitrogen) adsorbates (the Ys and -Aa values decrease). The difference in the Ys and -Ao values (Table 1.5) shows that the FAps value in Equation 1.2 gives significant contribution to the value. This suggests significant rearrangement of the interfacial water due to interaction with the solid surfaces in comparison with bulk water. [Pg.18]

The length of the alkyl on the imidazolium ring and its counterion can also affect the resolution, because part of the ionic liquids coated on the surface of the stationary phase could suppress the free silanols of the surface. The comparison of the ionic liquids with standard mobile phase additives, such as ammonium formate, showed that the ionic liquids have advantages as silanol suppressors in HPLC (17). [Pg.11]

First investigations revealed a comparison of batch-scale performance with micro-channel processing [91]. Further investigations of the role of surface effects catalyzing the esterification concerned the deliberate enhancement in the number of silanol groups on the glass surface of such micro-channel reactors. [Pg.715]


See other pages where Surface silanols comparison is mentioned: [Pg.256]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.992]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.843]    [Pg.959]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.803]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.179]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Silanolates

Silanoles

Silanols

Surface silanols

© 2024 chempedia.info