Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface approximation

Baer R, Charutz D M, Kosloff R and Baer M 1996 A study of conical intersection effects on scattering processes—the validity of adiabatic single-surface approximations within a quasi-Jahn-Teller model J. Chem. Phys. 105 9141... [Pg.2330]

Eigure 3 shows the winter and summer comfort zones plotted on the coordinates of the ASHRAE psychrometric chart. These zones should provide acceptable conditions for room occupants wearing typical indoor clothing who are at or near sedentary activity. Eigure 3 appHes generally to altitudes from sea level to 2150 m and to the common case for indoor thermal environments where the temperature of the surfaces (/) approximately equals air temperature (/ and the air velocity is less than 0.25 m/s. A wide range of environmental appHcations is covered by ASHRAE Comfort Standard 55 (5). Offices, homes, schools, shops, theaters, and many other appHcations are covered by this specification. [Pg.357]

In a nerve process or skeletal muscle fiber, the spread of activity is essentially only in one dimension, along the fiber. However, in smooth muscle the situation is rather more complex geometrically, and all three dimensions are involved. Action potentials conduct electrotonically just as they do in nerve fibers but they do so in three dimensions. In situ, regions supporting action potentials are not pointlike but tend to be large and the spread from them is more like a surface, approximating a plane. [Pg.195]

Note, the generalisation of the nomenclature, using 2 instead of ssq. The parabolic surface approximates 2 at the point pi/p2 The quality of the approximation decreases with increasing distance from pi/p2. [Pg.200]

Both surfaces of the conventional membrane are quite similar in appearance, and the cross section is only slightly anisotropic with little difference in pore and cell size from one surface to the other (Figure 10). in contrast, a considerable difference is apparent between the pore sizes at opposite surfaces of the Tyrann-M/E membrane (Figure 11). The structure is highly anisotropic with an approximately five fold difference between the size of the pores at the two surfaces. Approximately... [Pg.211]

The sample can be prepared in a cosolvent, such as 5-50% acetic add in water, acetonitrile/ water, chloroform, methanol, and trifluoroacetic acid (0.1 to 25%), at a concentration of approximately 1 to 5 mg mL-1. Sample solubility in this cosolvent is crucial because it acts as a medium between the sample and the matrix. The peptide solution (1 1 pL) is dissolved directly into the matrix on the probe tip (a flat round surface approximately 2-5 mm in diameter). When large amounts of sample (hundreds of micrograms) are available, the peptide can be added directly into the matrix, followed by the addition of a cosolvent such as trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) which, in addition to sample matrix solubility, can also facilitate protonation. [Pg.690]

These components are both non-zero at the surface. Since Os < —ias, ux reverses sign within a small distance below the surface (approximately z < —0.2Ar, depending on the value of a). The displacement amplitudes for fused silica are plotted in Fig. 6.2(b), normalized in the same way as the longitudinal and shear wave amplitudes in Fig. 6.2(a). The decay of the stress components has a simpler double exponential dependence. From (6.49)—(6.52),... [Pg.87]

Here, the diabatic PES for the motion of the skeleton modes are Ea(Q) = Ea — faaQ + 1/2QKqqQ and the coupling between the diabatic states is given by V Q) = — fa0Q + 1/2QKq/3Q. The fo0 and Ko0 are the diabatic state matrix elements of the forces and the Hessian for the skeleton modes, respectively. Exemplary PES are shown in Fig. 1. Note that Eq. (1) is exact within the reaction surface approximation, i.e., no assumption concerning an adiabatic separation of H-atom and skeleton motions has been made. [Pg.182]

The approximation is only valid if the characteristic decay length of the surface force is small in comparison to the curvature of the surfaces. Approximation (6.30) is sometimes called the Derjaguin approximation in honor of Derjaguin s work. He used this approach to calculated the interaction between two ellipsoids [132],... [Pg.93]

When the response surface has an extreme, then all coefficients of a canonic equation have the same signs and the center of the figure is close to the center of experiment. A saddle-type surface has a canonic equation where all coefficients have different signs. In a crest-type surface some canonic equation coefficients are insignificant and the center of the figure is far away from the center of experiment. To obtain a surface approximated by a second-order model for two factors, it is possible to get four kinds of contour curves-graphs of constant values ... [Pg.438]

The asymmetric spin boson model presents a significantly more challenging non-adiabatic condensed phase test problem due to the asymmetry in forces from the different surfaces. Approximate mean field methods, for example, will fail to reliably capture the effects of these different forces on the dynamics. [Pg.429]

EJ. Kansa. Multiquadratics - a scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid dynamics I. surface approximations and partial derivative estimates. Comput. Math. Appl., 19(6-8) 127-145, 1990. [Pg.596]

Alumina, neutral ai2o3 Adsorption, Prepared as a neutral surface, approximate pH of 7.5 used for separation of aromatics and... [Pg.131]

In this idealized case, the profile can be obtained by varying the incident particle energy E0 stepwise within a certain interval. Yield calibration is done by a standard in an analogous way as described in equation (4). Close to the surface equation (5) can be simplified by the so-called surface approximation which consists in replacing S(E) by S(E0), i.e. by the value of the energy loss at the surface. The expression for the depth scale is then simply dR(E0) — (E0—ER)/S(E0). [Pg.222]

It is assumed that the binding energy of an adsorbed single molecule to the surface approximately equals its partial molar adsorption enthalpy at zero surface coverage. In the adsorbed state at zero surface coverage the individual variations of the entropy are partly but not completely suppressed. Hence, it is expected that this adsorption enthalpy is proportional to the standard sublimation enthalpy, which characterizes the volatility properties of pure solid phases as an integral value, ... [Pg.227]

The advent of the atomic force microscope has allowed surface properties at nearly molecular length scales to be measured directly for the first time. Recently, a method has been proposed whereby a small ( 3.5 /nn) particle is attached to the cantilever tip of the commercially available, Nanoscope II AFM [67,68]. The particles are attached with an epoxy resin. When the cantilever tip is placed close to a planar surface, the AFM measures directly the interaction force between the particle and the surface. A primary difference between this technique and the surface forces apparatus (SFA) is the size of the substrates, since the SFA generally requires smooth surfaces approximately 2 cm in diameter. Other differences are discussed by Ducker et al. [68]. For our purposes, it suffices to note that the AFM method explicitly incorporates the particle-wall geometry that is the focus of this chapter. [Pg.283]


See other pages where Surface approximation is mentioned: [Pg.769]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.61]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.1702 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info