Saddle type

Small vertical vessels may be supported by angle support legs, as shown in Figure 12-11. Larger vertical vessels are generally supported by a skirt support, as shown in Figure 12-12. At least two (2) vent holes, 180" apart, should be provided at the uppermost location in the. skirt to prevent the accumulation of gas, which may create explosive conditions. Horizontal vessels are generally supported by a pair of saddle type supports. 

Cost of the packing and its effect on the system costs must be considered, as some packings are much more expensive than others, yet produce very little improved performance. Table 9-17 presents some comparative information. The most common packings and hence the ones with the most available data are Raschig rings, Berl saddles, several saddle types and Pall Rings (Norton Co.) or equivalent. 

In general the dumped saddle type packing should give less blocking to support openings than ring type. 

The clip method of making wire-rope attachments is widely used. Drop-forged clips of either the U-bolt or the double-saddle type are recommended. When properly applied as described herein, the method develops about 80% of the rope strength in the case of six strand ropes. 

The partial differential equations used to model the dynamic behavior of physicochemical processes often exhibit complicated, non-recurrent dynamic behavior. Simple simulation is often not capable of correlating and interpreting such results. We present two illustrative cases in which the computation of unstable, saddle-type solutions and their stable and unstable manifolds is critical to the understanding of the system dynamics. Implementation characteristics of algorithms that perform such computations are also discussed. 

What cannot be obtained through local bifurcation analysis however, is that both sides of the one-dimensional unstable manifold of a saddle-type unstable bimodal standing wave connect with the 7C-shift of the standing wave vice versa. This explains the pulsating wave it winds around a homoclinic loop consisting of the bimodal unstable standing waves and their one-dimensional unstable manifolds that connect them with each other. It is remarkable that this connection is a persistent homoclinic loop i.e. it exists for an entire interval in parameter space (131. It is possible to show that such a loop exists, based on the... 

Figure 1. Underlying structure of the "pulsating wave" solution two saddle-type standing waves S i and S2 that are n shifts of each other are...

The lower a graph is more interesting. While initially the Poincar6 phase portrait looks the same as before (point E, inset 2c) an interval of hysteresis is observed. The saddle-node bifurcation of the pericxiic solutions occurs off the invariant circle, and a region of two distinct attractors ensues a stable, quasiperiodic one and a stable periodic one (Point F, inset 2d). The boundary of the basins of attraction of these two attractors is the one-dimensional (for the map) stable manifold of the saddle-type periodic solutions, SA and SB. One side of the unstable manifold will get attract to one attractor (SC to the invariant circle) while the other side will approach die other attractor (SD to die periodic solution). 

The mechanism of these transitions is nontrivial and has been discussed in detail elsewhere Q, 12) it involves the development of a homoclinic tangencv and subsequently of a homoclinic tangle between the stable and unstable manifolds of the saddle-type periodic solution S. This tangle is accompanied by nontrivial dynamics (chaotic transients, large multiplicity of solutions etc.). It is impossible to locate and analyze these phenomena without computing the unstable, saddle-tvpe periodic frequency locked solution as well as its stable and unstable manifolds. It is precisely the interactions of such manifolds that are termed global bifurcations and cause in this case the loss of the quasiperiodic solution. 

Location of the saddle-type objects whose stable and/or unstable manifolds we want to compute by establish numerical methods. 

FePc, it is less active, but more stable, than a FePc/NaY material. These differences between the encapsulated complexes were attributed to the possibilities that reaction could occur only at the pore mouths of VPI-5, where oxidatively degraded FePc catalyst molecules were replenished by the layer beneath and that the tighter fit of FePc in the NaY supercage required a saddle-type distortion of the molecule, which, while making it more reactive, made the catalyst more prone to oxidation. 

This independency is related to the fact that the semiclassical calculation of the scattering amplitudes involves classical orbits belonging to an invariant set that is complementary to the set of trapped orbits in phase space [56]. The trapped orbits form the so-called repeller in systems where all the orbits are unstable of saddle type. The scattering orbits, by contrast, stay for a finite time in the scattering region. Even though the scattering orbits are controlled... 

Subsidiary elliptic islands of very small area continue to exist until a last homoclinic tangency occurs at Eht, above which all the trapped orbits of the invariant set are unstable of saddle type. The system is then fully chaotic. According to this scenario, the invariant set may contain quasiperi-odic motion for energies Ea < E < Eht, while the main elliptic island exists only for Ea < E < Ed < Eh,- The interval /, - Ea turns out to be small as compared with the energy interval above Eht, where full chaos has set in and the invariant set is a repeller. 

In the Smale horseshoe and its variants, the repeller is composed of an infinite set of periodic and nonperiodic orbits indefinitely trapped in the region defining the transition complex. All the orbits are unstable of saddle type. The repeller occupies a vanishing volume in phase space and is typically a fractal object. Its construction is based on strict topological rules. All the periodic and nonperiodic orbits turn out to be topological combinations of a finite number of periodic orbits called the fundamental periodic orbits. Symbols are assigned to these fundamental periodic orbits that form an alphabet... 

Fig. 8A shows that the selectivity for ketone and alcohol formation is quite similar for both molecular sieves. Fig. 8B indicates that regioselectivity exists for both molecular sieves, possibly due to the encaged nature of the complex. However, lower values of the C2/C3 and C2/C4 ratios are obtained in VPI-5 compared to zeolite Y, pointing to the existence of shape selectivity. The molecular graphics analysis, which enabled quantification of the free pore apertures, shows that the difference in selectivity can hardly be caused by differences in the zeolitic environment. The enhanced constraint observed for FePcY should then be related to the saddle-type deformation of the complex. 

For yc = 0.6 find the minimum value of Kc, that makes the middle unstable saddle-type steady state unique and stable. 

The maximum productivity of the desired product B usually occurs at the middle unstable saddle-type steady state. In order to stabilize the unstable steady state, a simple proportional-feedback-controlled system can be used, and we shall analyze such a controller now. A simple feedback-controlled bubbling fluidized bed is shown in Figure 4.25. 

Ym = set point which is usually the middle saddle type steady state temperature. 

Here the central steady state at y k, 0.4... and the two extremal steady states with y 0.0... and 1.0... are stable, while the two remaining steady states at y k, 0.3... and 0.5... are of saddle type and therefore unstable. Of these, the central one gives the optimal concentration for component B. The unstable ones that are adjacent to the middle one give moderate concentrations for B, while the extremal steady states with y k 0.0... and 1.0... produce hardly any amount of B according to the bottom plot of xs y) in Figure 4.31. We shall return to this example in Figure 4.38 with further comments on the robustness of the optimal central steady state and on the beneficial role of feedback in chemical/biological systems. 

The middle two plots show the dynamics of the reaction in the second tank. One steady state of tank 2 lies at (xAi(Tend), XBi(Tend), y Tend)) ss (0.33,0.67,1.28) and another at (xAi Tend), XBi Tend), y (Tend)) ss (0, 0.2,1.87). The latter gives the smaller yield of jg and results from the initial second tank conditions (x,i2(0), xb2(0), 2/2(0)) = (0.95,0,1.3) depicted in black. These two steady states are stable. There is another unstable steady state for this data, but our graphical method does obviously not allow us to find it because it is an unstable saddle-type steady state that will repel any profile that is near to it. It can be easily obtained from the steady-state equations, though. For a method to find all steady states of a three CSTR system, see Section 6.4.3. 

---