Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Substrate dominance

Schematic representation of manganese nodule end-member morphologies. The size of the arrows Indicates the proportion and direction of metal supply, (a) Typical situation In the open ocean with the nodules lying on an oxidized sediment substrate dominant mode of formation Is hydrogenous, (b) Typical situation In nearshore and freshwater environments with nodules lying on a sediment substrate that Is partly reducing In character. Dominant supply of metals Is via Interstitial waters from below the substrate surface. Source From Chester, R. (2003). Marine Geochemistry, 2nd ed. Blackwell, p. 425. Schematic representation of manganese nodule end-member morphologies. The size of the arrows Indicates the proportion and direction of metal supply, (a) Typical situation In the open ocean with the nodules lying on an oxidized sediment substrate dominant mode of formation Is hydrogenous, (b) Typical situation In nearshore and freshwater environments with nodules lying on a sediment substrate that Is partly reducing In character. Dominant supply of metals Is via Interstitial waters from below the substrate surface. Source From Chester, R. (2003). Marine Geochemistry, 2nd ed. Blackwell, p. 425.
A wide range of nucleophilic reagents has been used to initiate tandem vicinal difunctionalizations of a, -un saturated carbonyl-containing substrates. Dominant among these reagents are organocopper (Gil-... [Pg.253]

With the chiral center located in a side chain that is bent away from the surface, an achiral lattice is formed by the chiral diacetylene isophthalic acid derivative at the 1-octanol/graphite interface [73]. Because of the relatively weak interaction between the dangling chiral side chains, the achiral part of the molecule interacting with the substrate dominated the pattern formation. [Pg.235]

The quality of the results from SEC-FTIR strongly depend on the surface quality of the deposited sample fractions. Cheung et al. demonstrated that the surface wetting properties of the substrate dominate the deposit morphology [145]. The spectra fidelity, film quality, resolution and polymer recovery were considered by Balke et al. [ 146]. For different interface designs it was found that the morphology of the deposited polymer film was a key parameter for quantitative measurements. [Pg.48]

Enzymes operate by different rules than we normally use in synthetic chemistry. In nonenzymatic reactions, the intrinsic reactivity of the substrate dominates the chemistry. If we want to reduce a ketone, an aldehyde group in the same molecule will be more reactive. To obtain selectivity for the ketone group, we would need to block the aldehyde somehow. Moreover, if we want to oxidize a saturated carbon to form an alcohol, usually we would find the product alcohol oxidizes more readily, so the final product would be a ketone or aldehyde. Also, if we want to oxidize an isolated saturated carbon, a carbon-carbon double bond better not exist in the molecule or it would oxidize more readily. Generally, our synthetic procedures involve blocking such side reactions in some way. Enzymatic reactions have no such problems. [Pg.1209]

The entire previous section was devoted to the dewetting of thick films, the thickness e of which was greater than a micron. For thin films (e long-range forces between liquid and substrate dominate. They can be written as... [Pg.170]

For the conditions described in this section to apply, the surface viscosity rjs = of the film must be greater than the viscosity of the substrate multiplied by the size of the hole at all times during the dewetting process. If this criterion is not met, the dissipation in the substrate dominates and the opening of the hole (discussed in section 7.2.3) becomes independent of the viscosity of the film. [Pg.181]

The balance between these different types of bonds has a strong bearing on the resulting ordering or disordering of the surface. For adsorbates, the relative strength of adsorbate-substrate and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions is particularly important. Wlien adsorbate-substrate interactions dominate, well ordered overlayer structures are induced that are arranged in a superlattice, i.e. a periodicity which is closely related to that of the substrate lattice one then speaks of commensurate overlayers. This results from the tendency for each adsorbate to seek out the same type of adsorption site on the surface, which means that all adsorbates attempt to bond in the same maimer to substrate atoms. [Pg.1758]

The saturation coverage during chemisorption on a clean transition-metal surface is controlled by the fonnation of a chemical bond at a specific site [5] and not necessarily by the area of the molecule. In addition, in this case, the heat of chemisorption of the first monolayer is substantially higher than for the second and subsequent layers where adsorption is via weaker van der Waals interactions. Chemisorption is often usefLil for measuring the area of a specific component of a multi-component surface, for example, the area of small metal particles adsorbed onto a high-surface-area support [6], but not for measuring the total area of the sample. Surface areas measured using this method are specific to the molecule that chemisorbs on the surface. Carbon monoxide titration is therefore often used to define the number of sites available on a supported metal catalyst. In order to measure the total surface area, adsorbates must be selected that interact relatively weakly with the substrate so that the area occupied by each adsorbent is dominated by intennolecular interactions and the area occupied by each molecule is approximately defined by van der Waals radii. This... [Pg.1869]

Accumulating evidence makes it increasingly clear that there is no single dominant Wittig transition state geometry and, therefore, no simple scheme to explain cis/trans selec-tivities. The conventional betaine pathway may not occur at all, the stabilized ylides, e,g., PhsP—CH —C02Et, can be ( )- or (Z)-selective, depending on the solvent and substrate (E. Vedejs, 1988 A, B, 1990). [Pg.29]

Regioselectivity in FGIs is dominated by the pattern of substituents and by steric effects in the substrate as well as by the choice of appropriate reagents. [Pg.95]

Fn some cases, r-allylpalladium complex formation by retention syn attack) has been observed. The reaction of the cyclic allyiic chloride 33 with Pd(0) affords the 7r-allylpalladium chlorides 34 and 35 by retention or inversion depending on the solvents and Pd species. For example, retention is observed in benzene, THF, or dichloromethane with Pd2(dba)3. However, the complex formation proceeds by inversion in these solvents with Pd(Ph3P)4, whereas in MeCN and DMSO it is always inversion[33]. The syn attack in this case may be due to coordination of Pd to chlorine in 33, because Pd is halophilic. The definite syn attack in complex formation has been observed using stereoche-mically biased substrates. The reaction of the cxoallylic diphenylphosphino-acetate 36 with phenylzinc proceeds smoothly to give 37. The reaction can be explained by complex formation by a syn mechanism[31]. However, these syn attacks are exceptional, and normally anti attack dominates. [Pg.297]

Substrates involved in molecular recognition may feature a particular shape, size, state of charge, chemical affinity or optical specification (19,30,33—36). In general most of these parameters share. Nevertheless there may be dominating features of a certain substrate molecule to be used by a complementary receptor in the recognition process (9). [Pg.177]

Fig. 13. Hydrogen bond dominated substrate recognition of (a), (c) dicarboxylic acids (b) 2-anainopyrknidine and (d) urea. Fig. 13. Hydrogen bond dominated substrate recognition of (a), (c) dicarboxylic acids (b) 2-anainopyrknidine and (d) urea.
Fig. 14. 71-Stacking and chaige-tiansfei dominated recognition of flat aromatic—heteioaromatic substrates (formation of intercalates). Fig. 14. 71-Stacking and chaige-tiansfei dominated recognition of flat aromatic—heteioaromatic substrates (formation of intercalates).
Theoretical studies of diffusion aim to predict the distribution profile of an exposed substrate given the known process parameters of concentration, temperature, crystal orientation, dopant properties, etc. On an atomic level, diffusion of a dopant in a siUcon crystal is caused by the movement of the introduced element that is allowed by the available vacancies or defects in the crystal. Both host atoms and impurity atoms can enter vacancies. Movement of a host atom from one lattice site to a vacancy is called self-diffusion. The same movement by a dopant is called impurity diffusion. If an atom does not form a covalent bond with siUcon, the atom can occupy in interstitial site and then subsequently displace a lattice-site atom. This latter movement is beheved to be the dominant mechanism for diffusion of the common dopant atoms, P, B, As, and Sb (26). [Pg.349]


See other pages where Substrate dominance is mentioned: [Pg.45]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.2746]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.884]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.2746]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.884]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.1206]    [Pg.1942]    [Pg.2414]    [Pg.2622]    [Pg.2729]    [Pg.2808]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.391]   


SEARCH



Domin

Dominance

Dominant

Dominate

Domination

Protein dominated substrates

© 2024 chempedia.info