Substrate concentration, effect formation

Intramolecular allylic aminations (Scheme 9.20) proceeded with low catalytic efficiency and with ee-values <90% if procedure (a) (cf. Section 9.2.3.2) was used-that is, the catalyst was not activated [18]. The effect of catalyst activation [procedure (c)] was pronounced [18, 22a] for example, activation with TBD increased the rate of formation of N-benzyl-2-vinylpiperidine by a factor of about 1000. Also notable was the fact that substrate concentration as high as 1M was possible, thereby demonstrating the high preference of intramolecular over intermolecular substitutions leading to oligomers. 

The substrate concentration dependence of the reaction rates was investigated kinetically to analyze the substrate binding effect. Figure 4 shows the relationships between the hydrolysis rate of amylose in the presence of the random copolymer catalyst and the concentration of the substrate at some reaction temperatures. The reaction rate clearly showed the saturation phenomenon at each reaction temperature. If the reaction proceeds via complex formation between catalyst and substrate, the elementary reaction could be described in the most simplified form as... 

Since a competitive inhibitor has a strong structural resemblance to the substrate, both the inhibitor and substrate compete for the active site of an enzyme. The formation of an enzyme-inhibitor complex reduces the amount of enzyme available for interaction with the substrate and, as a result, the rate of reaction decreases. A competitive inhibitor normally combines reversibly with enzyme. Therefore, the effect of the inhibitor can be minimized by increasing the substrate concentration, unless the substrate concentration is greater than the concentration at which the substrate itself inhibits the reaction. The mechanism of competitive inhibition can be expressed as follows ... 

Suzuki et al. examined the effect of various divalent cations on purified recombinant human GCH expressed in Escherichia coli to clarify the molecular mechanism of action of divalent cations on the GCH enzymatic activity [150]. They demonstrated that GCH utilizes metal-free GTP as the substrate for the enzyme reaction. Inhibition of the GCH activity by divalent cations such as Mg(II) and Zn(II) was due to a reduction in the concentration of metal-free GTP substrate by complex formation. Many nucleotidehydrolyzing enzymes such as G proteins and kinases recognize Mg-GTP or Mg-ATP complex as their substrate. In contrast with these enzymes, Suzuki et al. demonstrated that GCH activity is dependent on the concentration of Mg-free GTP [150]. 

Zhao and Lou [164] studied the metabolism of omeprazole to its two major metabolites, hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone, in rat liver microsomes by a reversed-phase HPLC assay. The formation of metabolites of omeprazole depended on incubation time, substrate concentration, microsomal protein concentration, and was found to be optimal at pH 7.4. The Pmax and Km of omeprazole hydroxylation in the rat liver microsomal preparation were 2033 nmol /(min mg protein), and 46.8 ymol/l, respectively. The effects of seven drugs on omeprazole metabolism were tested. Mephenytoin, five benzodiazepines and pava-verine caused inhibition of omeprazole metabolism. 

Figure 6 (a) Effect of substrate concentration on product formation. , 0.063 mg/ml ... 

The first clue was the observation that, at a constant concentration of enzyme, the reaction rate increases with increasing substrate concentration until a maximal velocity is reached (Figure 8.4). In contrast, uncatalyzed reactions do not show this saturation effect. The fact that an enzyme-catalyzed reaction has a maximal velocity suggests the formation of a discrete ES complex. At a sufficiently high substrate concentration, all the catalytic sites are filled and so the reaction rate cannot increase. Although indirect, this is the most general evidence for the existence of ES complexes. 

The main effects of the HT-HP tretitment are the following a decreased Si/SiNx interface roughness and improved uniformity of the layer thickness, a decreased concentration and dimensions of defects at the top silicon layer and the substrate, a suppressed formation of exfoliation defects in the top silicon layer, a decreased size of silicon nanocrystals at the Si/SiNx interface and nitride nanocrystals within amorphous SiN. 

---