Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Subject time derivative analysis

In addition to finding the concentrations that make all the time derivatives in the rate equations vanish, it is useful to have another piece of information about such a time-independent or steady state. If the system starts at the steady state and is then subjected to a small perturbation, for example, injection or removal of a pinch of one of the reactants, we may ask whether the system will return to the original state or will evolve toward some other asymptotic behavior. The question we are asking here is whether or not the state of interest is stable. One of the basic tools of nonlinear chemical dynamics is stability analysis, which is the determination of how a given asymptotic solution to the rate equations describing a system will respond to an infinitesimal perturbation. [Pg.25]

At the end of each day, all the scans were subjected to qualitative analysis using the vendor s software. After evaluating various data treatments, first derivatives were used for all library entries and all predictions. The resulting printed report contained the date, time of each scan, sample name, sample identification when compared with the stored library, and Mahalanobis distance from the library sample. [Editor s note if the reader doesn t understand Mahalanobis distances, refer to Chapter 15 in Part in.]... [Pg.713]

Main subject of the analysis presented here was the fire dynamics as simulated by the FDS code in interaction with stochastic factors affecting the fire over time. The mixture of MCDET and FDS was used to simulate many different time series of quantities of the fire dynamics associated with corresponding conditional occurrence probabilities. From these results, distributions referring to the temporal evolution of target temperatures and quantifications of the influence of epistemic uncertainties could be derived. [Pg.768]

Bayesian methods are very amenable to applying diverse types of information. An example provided during the workshop involved Monte Carlo predictions of pesticide disappearance from a water body based on laboratory-derived rate constants. Field data for a particular time after application was used to adjust or update the priors of the Monte Carlo simulation results for that day. The field data and laboratory data were included in the analysis to produce a posterior estimate of predicted concentrations through time. Bayesian methods also allow subjective weight of evidence and objective evidence to be combined in producing an informed statement of risk. [Pg.171]

A sample (ca. 1 g) of K-crotonate was placed in a Pyrex tube (6 mm i.d. (x200 mm) and heated in a metal bath maintained at a constant temperature. The tube was evacuated through the reaction. After a given time the reaction tube was taken out of the bath and allowed to cool to room temperature. The heat-treated salt was weighed and dissolved in aqueous hydrochloric acid solution and extracted with ether. The ether extract was treated with diazomethane. The methyl ester derivatives of the products were subjected to analysis by gas chromatography using diethyl maleate as internal standard. [Pg.79]

In this paper we have derived expressions for the environment-induced correction to the Berry phase, for a spin coupled to an environment. On one hand, we presented a simple quantum-mechanical derivation for the case when the environment is treated as a separate quantum system. On the other hand, we analyzed the case of a spin subject to a random classical field. The quantum-mechanical derivation provides a result which is insensitive to the antisymmetric part of the random-field correlations. In other words, the results for the Lamb shift and the Berry phase are insensitive to whether the different-time values of the random-field operator commute with each other or not. This observation gives rise to the expectation that for a random classical field, with the same noise power, one should obtain the same result. For the quantities at hand, our analysis outlined above involving classical randomly fluctuating fields has confirmed this expectation. [Pg.25]


See other pages where Subject time derivative analysis is mentioned: [Pg.345]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.1082]    [Pg.1085]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.350]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.221 , Pg.222 ]




SEARCH



Analysis derivatives

Subject derivatives

Subjective analysis

Time derivative analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info