Subject monitoring physical tests

Vulnerability of the liver to injury necessitates routine evaluation of hepatic function in patients and asymptomatic individuals to avert or control adverse clinical conditions. Thus, a plethora of methods has been developed for the diagnosis of liver diseases and dysfunctions. One such method uses physical palpation to determine alterations or changes in the orientation of the liver, which provides valuable information about the organ status but the quality of information is subjective and imprecise [3]. Another common method for the diagnosis of more serious hepatic injuries involves liver biopsies coupled with biochemical tests to determine the extent of liver injury and prognosis [4-7]. However, in acute and some chronic hepatic disorders, dynamic and continuous hepatic function monitoring would be advantageous. 

A (National) GLP Compliance Programme may cover only a limited range of chemicals, e.g., industrial chemicals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, etc., or may include all chemicals. The scope of the monitoring for compliance should be defined, both with respect to the categories of chemicals and to the types of tests subject to it, e.g., physical, chemical, toxicological and/or ecotoxicological. 

Although physical instrumentation is more convenient, lack of an integrated output and the need for regular calibration are hindrances to its widespread application to measurement of the number of photons absorbed by a sample. The alternative is to use a chemical actinometer system in which a photochemical reaction of known characteristics is monitored when subjected to the same irradiation conditions as the test sample. When used in the fashion described next, the chemical actinometer measures the number of photons actually absorbed by the sample, rather than the incident total. 

To a solution of potassium ferf-butoxide (0.05 mmol 5 mol%) in tert- mty alcohol (1 mL) in a test tube, a mixture of acetophenone (1 1.0 mmol) and aldehyde (2 1.0 mmol) was added followed by continuous stirring for several minutes at room temperature until the starting materials were completely disappeared (monitored by TLC) thiol (3 1.2 mmol) was then added to the reaction mixture, and was stirred to completion of the reaction. The solvent was evaporated, and chloroform (1 mL) was added and the crude product was subjected to preparative TLC (silica gel, eluent petroleum ether/Et20 = 7 4) to afford a pure p-aryl-p-mercapto ketone 4 in excellent yield (85-95%). The structures of aU the products were established on the basis of physical and spectral properties. 

During the course of any of these tests which involve radiation hazards, in addition to the administrative procedures mentioned, continuous monitoring is provided using the services of the client s health physics team together in many cases with the specialized health physicist provided by the main contractor. Admission to radiation zones is controlled by means of a pass system working times and methods used are all subject to scrutiny by health physics teams. 

---