Subject modulation method

The second module. Method, involves determining the level of verification and validation to which the user s methodology has been subjected. Verification is the general process used to decide whether a method in question is capable of producing accurate and reliable data. Validation is an experimental process involving external corroboration by other laboratories (internal or external) of methods or the use of reference materials to evaluate the suitability of methodology (1). A menu of choices includes (1) the method has only been verified, (2) the method has been both verified and validated, or (3) the method has been neither verified or validated. 

The properties and applications of microelectrodes, as well as the broad field of electroanalysis, have been the subject of a number of reviews. Unwin reviewed the use of dynamic electrochemical methods to probe interfacial processes for a wide variety of techniques and applications including various flow-channel methods and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SEM), including issues relating to mass transport (1). Williams and Macpherson reviewed hydrodynamic modulation methods and their mass transport issues (2). Eklund et al. reviewed cyclic voltammetry, hydrodynamic voltammetry, and sono-voltammetry for assessment of electrode reaction kinetics and mechanisms with discussion of mass transport modelling issues (3). Here, we focus on applications ranging from measnrements in small volumes to electroanalysis in electrolyte free media that exploit the uniqne properties of microelectrodes. 

The Waters system uses a plastic cartridge which is inserted into a device (the Z-module) that subjects the column to radial compression, ie pressure is applied along the radial axis of the column tube. The flexible wall of the column then moulds itself into the voids that are present in the wall regions of the column. This method is claimed to produce an improvement in the packed bed structure, better column performance and longer useful column life. 

Fig. 16.4. Three methods of obtaining Raman-based estimates of biofluid concentrations in vivo, a Confocal isolation of a subsurface volume occupied by a blood vessel, enabling direct measurement of a blood spectrum, b Difference measurement between tissue in two states, one with more blood in the sampling volume (in this case, due to pressure modulation by the subject [6]). Computing the difference removes the bulk tissue contributions to the spectral measurement and emphasizes the contribution from blood, c Statistical correlation approach of measuring many volunteers tissue in a region where sufficient blood is present (e.g., the forearm as shown here) and obtaining a correlated reference value from a blood sample drawn at the same time. Multivariate calibration is then used to find correlations between the reference value and the spectral data vector. Unlike the previous two methods, this does not intrinsically isolate the blood chemicals Raman signatures from those of the surrounding tissue volume...

A major concern in the development of coupled instrumental methods is the interface that links the separation module to the detector. Many factors must be addressed, including adjustments of the experimental conditions to accommodate the flow rate of gas or liquid from the chromatographic column. The nature of the liquid eluents is also important in the operation of the detector. Thus, the design of new and improved interfaces has been the subject of a number of reports. 

---