Hydrodynamic modulation methods

This review has attempted to put hydrodynamic modulation methods for electroanalysis and for the study of electrochemical reactions into context with other electrochemical techniques. HM is particularly useful for the extension of detection limits in analysis and for the detection of heterogeneity on electrode surfaces. The timescale addressable using HM methodology is limited by the time taken for diffusion across the concentration boundary layer, typically >0.1 s for conventional RDE and channel electrode geometries. This has meant a restriction on the application of HM to deduce fast reaction mechanisms. New methodologies, employing smaller electrodes and thin layer geometries look to lift this restraint. 

The properties and applications of microelectrodes, as well as the broad field of electroanalysis, have been the subject of a number of reviews. Unwin reviewed the use of dynamic electrochemical methods to probe interfacial processes for a wide variety of techniques and applications including various flow-channel methods and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SEM), including issues relating to mass transport (1). Williams and Macpherson reviewed hydrodynamic modulation methods and their mass transport issues (2). Eklund et al. reviewed cyclic voltammetry, hydrodynamic voltammetry, and sono-voltammetry for assessment of electrode reaction kinetics and mechanisms with discussion of mass transport modelling issues (3). Here, we focus on applications ranging from measnrements in small volumes to electroanalysis in electrolyte free media that exploit the uniqne properties of microelectrodes. 

Wilhams DE, MacPherson J (1999) Hydrodynamic modulation methods in electrochemistry. In Compton RG, Hancock G (eds) Comprehensive chemical kinetics, vol 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 369 38... 

---