Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stressed particle distribution

Crushers and Roller Mills. In this equipment group, stress is applied by either cmshing single particles or a bed of particles between two sohd surfaces. In general, most machines are used for coarse and medium-size reduction, with the exception of the high pressure roUer mill which can achieve extremely fine particle distributions. [Pg.141]

In Fig. 55, the results shown were obtained in three stirred media mills with a perforated stirrer disc of different sizes (V [1] = 0.73 5.54 12.9). The results are not satisfactory with respect to the scale-up rule. Here, too, it can be seen that small mills (V < 11), under otherwise identical conditions, produce a coarser product than larger ones. A satisfying correlation is achieved by plotting the median particle size, dso, versus the mean stress intensity. This is defined as stress intensity of the grinding media multiplied by the term which takes into account the stress intensity distribution [138],... [Pg.133]

We note that the second term in (108) is the familiar Kirkwood expression for the stress tensor in terms of the n-particle distribution function. [Pg.116]

It is interesting to note here that while the technique of particle harvesting and reconstituting material with narrower particle distributions has been successful in elucidating the particle size effect, the required radiation induced partial crosslinking of the rubber in the particles has resulted in some elevation of the flow stress. This elevation is less likely to be due to the slight increase in particle stiffness, but more... [Pg.341]

Under uni-axial tension, the effect of particles is mainly to be stress concentration sites. During crack propagation, the stress field is tri-axial debonding with void growth accommodates the volume expansion of the material at the crack front. The stress re-distribution in the matrix... [Pg.45]

Other errors, which could influence the results obtained, are, for example, wall effects ( slipping ), the dissipation of heat, and the increase in temperature due to shear. In a tube, the viscosity of a flowing medium is less near the tube walls compared to the center. This is due to the occurrence of shear stress and wall friction and has to be minimized by the correct choice of the tube diameter. In most cases, an increase in tube diameter reduces the influence of wall slip on the flow rate measured, but for Newtonian materials of low viscosity, a large tube diameter could be the cause of turbulent flow. ° When investigating suspensions with tube viscometers, constrictions can lead to inhomogeneous particle distributions and blockage. Due to the influence of temperature on viscosity (see Section Influence Factors on the Viscosity ), heat dissipated must be removed instantaneously, and temperature increase due to shear must be prevented under all circumstances. This is mainly a constructional problem of rheometers. Technically, the problem is easier to control in tube rheometers than in rotating instruments, in particular, the concentric cylinder viscometers. ... [Pg.3139]

Wall Shear Stress Measurements, Fig. 3 Schematic of in-plane velocity measurement. The inhomogeneous particle distribution and defocused particle images with different velocities due to out-of-plane gradients bias the results... [Pg.3484]

Pig. 8. General mechanisms of enhancing the toughness of structurally modified polymers-group II mechanisms (in the boxes the crosshatched areas are inorganic particles, fibers or weak (rubber-like) particles distributed in a bulk matrix polymer [Pg.4723]

All strains and stresses ate supposed to be uniform and homogeneous in the whole volume of each particle in all phases. Mutual interactions are realized at the phase interfaces. Strains and stresses ate distributed in a different manner for the different components as well as for the different volume distributions of the phases. Let us demonstrate the approximation for series and parallel connection of two phases (Fig. 7.25). In series connection, stress component along X3-ditection is the same in all phases, while the strain is different in the phases due to the different stiffness On the contraiy, strains ate the same in both phases in the direction perpendicular to the x3-axis, while the stresses are distributed differently in both phases. Assuming all interface conditions, following effective material properties could be calculated (similar method is applied also to the parallel connection of the elements)... [Pg.168]

Studies on randomness of filler distribution in polymethylacrylate nanocomposite are interesting. In this experiment, siUca particles were formed both before and after matrix polymerization. The results indicated that the concentration of silica was a controlling factor in the stress-strain relationship rather than the uniformity of particle distribution. Also, there was no anisotropy of mechanical properties regardless of the sequence of filler formation. This outcome cannot be expected to be duplicated in all other systems. For example, when nickel coated fibers were used in an EMI shielding application." When compounded with polycarbonate resin, fibers had a much worse performance than when a diy blend was prepared first and then incorporated into the polymer (Figure 7.1). In this case, pre-blending protected the fiber from breakage. [Pg.223]

Anisotropic mechanical behaviour as seen by the naked eye (a) and by stress-strain measurements (b).Three samples are compared, each having the same amount of filler particles, but with different particle distribution as indicated in the figure. In figure (a) the arrows indicate the chain alignment. [Pg.142]

Recently [40], a novel numerical approach, the object-oriented finite element (OOF) [41,42] analysis has been utilized by mapping the real micro/nano morphological images of PP/clay nanocomposites with varied clay contents between 1 and 10 wt%. Such morphological images are captured by two different microscopic techniques, the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analyses. The tensile moduli of nanocomposites are nmnerically predicted and subsequently compared with the tensile test data. Fuithermore, the available composites models aie used to validate the numerical approach developed in the same [40] study. Finally, the effect of particle distribution on the deformation behavior is also evaluated through the tensile stress and elastic strain contours of such nanocomposites [40]. [Pg.189]


See other pages where Stressed particle distribution is mentioned: [Pg.27]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.2318]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.2301]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.1237]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.4725]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.202]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.335 ]




SEARCH



Particle distribution

Stress distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info