Strain time dependent

Bergstrom, J. S., and Boyce, M. C., Earge Strain Time-dependent Behavior of Filled Elastomers, Mech. Mater, 32 627-644 (2000)... 

Bergstrom, LS. and Boyce, M.C. (1998) Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependence behavior of elastomers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46, 931-954. 

Creep testing is a test to determine the strain-time dependence of a material under a constant load. This test is also used to determine the long-term behavior of the material luider combination of load and temperature. For ceramic matrix composites, when this testing is done in air, there is an added complexity of environmental exposure. A total of 12 creep tests were done on straight-sided tensile bars with two different central hole sizes (2.286 and 4.572 mm) at 1204 C. 

The HM is a constitutive model aimed at predicting the large strain time-dependent behavior of both crosslinked and uncrosslinked UHMWPE. The kinematic framework used in the HM is based on a decomposition of the applied deformation gradient into elastic and viscoplastic components F = P... 

The predicted results for the uniaxial tension, and the tension-compression data are shown in Figures 14.17 and 14.18, respectively. It is clear that the HM accurately captures both the large strain time-dependent response and the intermediate strain cyclic response. 

Bergstrom J.S., and M.C. Boyce. 2000. Large strain time-dependent behavior of filled elastomers. Mech Mater 32 627-644. 

However, the evaluation of the mechanical properties invariably starts with the testing of tensile properties. Whilst for some fibre applications the tensile properties are directly relevant, there are many cases where it is difficult to relate the fibre performance in the end-product to the fibre tensile properties. Indeed, in some applications better tensile properties could result in a poorer end-product performance (e.g. due to fibrillation resulting in poor abrasion resistance). The result of a tensile test is a stress/strain curve. Since fibres are viscoelastic, the relationship between the tensile stress and tensile strain is influenced by the test conditions (temperature and relative humidity of the environment, stress and/or strain time-dependence, etc. ). 

In Equation (1.28) function M(t - r ) is the time-dependent memory function of linear viscoelasticity, non-dimensional scalars 4>i and 4>2 and are the functions of the first invariant of Q(t - f ) and F, t t ), which are, respectively, the right Cauchy Green tensor and its inverse (called the Finger strain tensor) (Mitsoulis, 1990). The memory function is usually expressed as... 

The elastic and viscoelastic properties of materials are less familiar in chemistry than many other physical properties hence it is necessary to spend a fair amount of time describing the experiments and the observed response of the polymer. There are a large number of possible modes of deformation that might be considered We shall consider only elongation and shear. For each of these we consider the stress associated with a unit strain and the strain associated with a unit stress the former is called the modulus, the latter the compliance. Experiments can be time independent (equilibrium), time dependent (transient), or periodic (dynamic). Just to define and describe these basic combinations takes us into a fair amount of detail and affords some possibilities for confusion. Pay close attention to the definitions of terms and symbols. 

The situation is not so simple when these various parameters are time dependent. In the latter case, the moduli, designated by E(t)and G(t), are evaluated by examining the (time dependent) value of o needed to maintain a constant strain 7o- By constrast, the time-dependent compliances D(t) and J(t)are determined by measuring the time-dependent strain associated with a constant stress Oq. Thus whether the deformation mode is tension or shear, the modulus is a measure of the stress required to produce a unit strain. Likewise, the compliance is a measure of the strain associated with a unit stress. As required by these definitions, the units of compliance are the reciprocals of the units of the moduli m in the SI system. 

Returning to the Maxwell element, suppose we rapidly deform the system to some state of strain and secure it in such a way that it retains the initial deformation. Because the material possesses the capability to flow, some internal relaxation will occur such that less force will be required with the passage of time to sustain the deformation. Our goal with the Maxwell model is to calculate how the stress varies with time, or, expressing the stress relative to the constant strain, to describe the time-dependent modulus. Such an experiment can readily be performed on a polymer sample, the results yielding a time-dependent stress relaxation modulus. In principle, the experiment could be conducted in either a tensile or shear mode measuring E(t) or G(t), respectively. We shall discuss the Maxwell model in terms of shear. 

In this section we consider a different experimental situation the case of creep. In a creep experiment a is maintained at a constant value and the time dependence of the strain is measured. Thus it is the exact inverse of the relaxation... 

Another aspect of plasticity is the time dependent progressive deformation under constant load, known as creep. This process occurs when a fiber is loaded above the yield value and continues over several logarithmic decades of time. The extension under fixed load, or creep, is analogous to the relaxation of stress under fixed extension. Stress relaxation is the process whereby the stress that is generated as a result of a deformation is dissipated as a function of time. Both of these time dependent processes are reflections of plastic flow resulting from various molecular motions in the fiber. As a direct consequence of creep and stress relaxation, the shape of a stress—strain curve is in many cases strongly dependent on the rate of deformation, as is illustrated in Figure 6. 

An important aspect of the mechanical properties of fibers concerns their response to time dependent deformations. Fibers are frequently subjected to conditions of loading and unloading at various frequencies and strains, and it is important to know their response to these dynamic conditions. In this connection the fatigue properties of textile fibers are of particular importance, and have been studied extensively in cycHc tension (23). The results have been interpreted in terms of molecular processes. The mechanical and other properties of fibers have been reviewed extensively (20,24—27). 

The elongation of a stretched fiber is best described as a combination of instantaneous extension and a time-dependent extension or creep. This viscoelastic behavior is common to many textile fibers, including acetate. Conversely, recovery of viscoelastic fibers is typically described as a combination of immediate elastic recovery, delayed recovery, and permanent set or secondary creep. The permanent set is the residual extension that is not recoverable. These three components of recovery for acetate are given in Table 1 (4). The elastic recovery of acetate fibers alone and in blends has also been reported (5). In textile processing strains of more than 10% are avoided in order to produce a fabric of acceptable dimensional or shape stabiUty. 

Figure 16 (145). For an elastic material (Fig. 16a), the resulting strain is instantaneous and constant until the stress is removed, at which time the material recovers and the strain immediately drops back to 2ero. In the case of the viscous fluid (Fig. 16b), the strain increases linearly with time. When the load is removed, the strain does not recover but remains constant. Deformation is permanent. The response of the viscoelastic material (Fig. 16c) draws from both kinds of behavior. An initial instantaneous (elastic) strain is followed by a time-dependent strain. When the stress is removed, the initial strain recovery is elastic, but full recovery is delayed to longer times by the viscous component.

It is important to differentiate between brittie and plastic deformations within materials. With brittie materials, the behavior is predominantiy elastic until the yield point is reached, at which breakage occurs. When fracture occurs as a result of a time-dependent strain, the material behaves in an inelastic manner. Most materials tend to be inelastic. Figure 1 shows a typical stress—strain diagram. The section A—B is the elastic region where the material obeys Hooke s law, and the slope of the line is Young s modulus. C is the yield point, where plastic deformation begins. The difference in strain between the yield point C and the ultimate yield point D gives a measure of the brittieness of the material, ie, the less difference in strain, the more brittie the material. 

Stress relaxation, while aUied to creep, is different (20—23). Stress relaxation is the time-dependent decrease in load (stress) at the contact displacement resulting from connector mating. Here, the initial elastic strain in the spring contact is replaced by time-dependent microplastic flow. Creep, on the other hand, relates to time-dependent geometry change (strain or displacement) under fixed load, which is a condition that does not apply to coimectors. 

The jump conditions must be satisfied by a steady compression wave, but cannot be used by themselves to predict the behavior of a specific material under shock loading. For that, another equation is needed to independently relate pressure (more generally, the normal stress) to the density (or strain). This equation is a property of the material itself, and every material has its own unique description. When the material behind the shock wave is a uniform, equilibrium state, the equation that is used is the material s thermodynamic equation of state. A more general expression, which can include time-dependent and nonequilibrium behavior, is called the constitutive equation. 

The difference is that the strain now depends on time and temperature. 

Figure 11-3. Time dependent strain curve under constant load.

For small shear strains we can define a time-dependent compliance (reciprocal modulus) by the equation... 

The theory relating stress, strain, time and temperature of viscoelastic materials is complex. For many practical purposes it is often better to use an ad hoc system known as the pseudo-elastic design approach. This approach uses classical elastic analysis but employs time- and temperature-dependent data obtained from creep curves and their derivatives. In outline the procedure consists of the following steps ... 

The maximum temperature at which mild steel can be used is 550°C. Above this temperature the formation of iron oxides and rapid scaling makes the use of mild steels uneconomical. For equipment subjected to high loadings at elevated temperatures, it is not economical to use carbon steel in cases above 450°C because of its poor creep strength. (Creep strength is time-dependent, with strain occurring under stress.)... 

Strength and Stiffness. Thermoplastic materials are viscoelastic which means that their mechanical properties reflect the characteristics of both viscous liquids and elastic solids. Thus when a thermoplastic is stressed it responds by exhibiting viscous flow (which dissipates energy) and by elastic displacement (which stores energy). The properties of viscoelastic materials are time, temperature and strain rate dependent. Nevertheless the conventional stress-strain test is frequently used to describe the (short-term) mechanical properties of plastics. It must be remembered, however, that as described in detail in Chapter 2 the information obtained from such tests may only be used for an initial sorting of materials. It is not suitable, or intended, to provide design data which must usually be obtained from long term tests. 

Creep and Recovery Behaviour. Plastics exhibit a time-dependent strain response to a constant applied stress. This behaviour is called creep. In a similar fashion if the stress on a plastic is removed it exhibits a time dependent recovery of strain back towards its original dimensions. This is illustrated in... 

The most characteristic features of viscoelastic materials are that they exhibit a time dependent strain response to a constant stress (creep) and a time dependent stress response to a constant strain (relaxation). In addition when the... 

The only unknown on the right hand side is a value for modulus E. For the plastic this is time-dependent but a suitable value may be obtained by reference to the creep curves in Fig. 2.5. A section across these curves at the service life of 1 year gives the isochronous graph shown in Fig. 2.13. The maximum strain is recommended as 1.5% so a secant modulus may be taken at this value and is found to be 347 MN/m. This is then used in the above equation. 

The predicted strain variation is shown in Fig. 2.43(b). The constant strain rates predicted in this diagram are a result of the Maxwell model used in this example to illustrate the use of the superposition principle. Of course superposition is not restricted to this simple model. It can be applied to any type of model or directly to the creep curves. The method also lends itself to a graphical solution as follows. If a stress is applied at zero time, then the creep curve will be the time dependent strain response predicted by equation (2.54). When a second stress, 0 2 is added then the new creep curve will be obtained by adding the creep due to 02 to the anticipated creep if stress a had remained... 

For a linear viscoelastic material in which the strain recovery may be regarded as the reversal of creep then the material behaviour may be represented by Fig. 2.49. Thus the time-dependent residual strain, Sr(t), may be expressed as... 

A plastic with a time dependent creep modulus as in the previous example is stressed at a linear rate to 40 MN/m in 100 seconds. At this time the stress in reduced to 30 MN/m and kept constant at this level. If the elastic and viscous components of the modulus are 3.5 GN/m and 50 x 10 Ns/m, use Boltzmann s Superposition Principle to calculate the strain after (a) 60 seconds and (b) 130 seconds. 

The data obtained from the resistance measurements are shown in Fig. 4.10. The assigned values of conductivity are limited in accuracy because the measured resistance was found to be somewhat time dependent. The [100] datum at the lowest strain was particularly so and a definite resistance value cannot be assigned to that point. 

---