Steric factor, table

Higher inclusion ability of 68b for alcohols as compared to 68a is probably due to a similar steric factor (Table 5). Anyhow, refering to the above finding, efficient host compounds which have 2,4-dimethylphenyl groups (77 and 69) were designed for ethanol isolation. 

The Fukui Equations (4.16), (4.17), and (4.18) reactivity indices are considered a measure of the reactivity of the molecule (as nucleophil, electrophil, or radical) when the reaction center is the atom for which the indices have been calculated. The values of the Fukui indices, calculated for different atoms, allow the comparison of the atoms and the identification, as a rule, of the reaction center in different types of chemical reactions. The reactivity estimated in this way does not consider steric factors. Table 4.4 presents the values of the Fukui reactivity indices for the isomers of guanine that are analyzed here. The indices 1, Ie, and 1r do not reflect the deformation of the electron clouds of two molecules that are approaching in order to react 1 therefore they are called static. The reactivity indices that consider this factor also are called dynamic. Their calculation requires much more complicated formulas (Roothaan 1951) and involves the comparison of the energy of the molecular orbitals of the isolated molecules to the energy of the molecular orbitals of the supermolecule (i.e., the ensemble of the A and B molecules, situated at very short distances). 

The cases of pentamethylbenzene and anthracene reacting with nitronium tetrafluoroborate in sulpholan were mentioned above. Each compound forms a stable intermediate very rapidly, and the intermediate then decomposes slowly. It seems that here we have cases where the first stage of the two-step process is very rapid (reaction may even be occurring upon encounter), but the second stages are slow either because of steric factors or because of the feeble basicity of the solvent. The course of the subsequent slow decomposition of the intermediate from pentamethylbenzene is not yet fully understood, but it gives only a poor yield of pentamethylnitrobenzene. The intermediate from anthracene decomposes at a measurable speed to 9-nitroanthracene and the observations are compatible with a two-step mechanism in which k i k E and i[N02" ] > / i. There is a kinetic isotope effect (table 6.1), its value for the reaction in acetonitrile being near to the... 

The regioselectivity of the reaction appears to be determined by a balance of electronic and steric factors. For acrylate and propiolate esters, the carb-oxylate group is found preferentially at C3 of the carbazole product[6-8]. Interestingly, a 4-methyl substituent seems to reinforce the preference for the EW group to appear at C3 (compare Entries 4 and 5 in Table 16.2). For disubstituted acetylenic dicnophiles, there is a preference for the EW group to be at C2 of the carbazole ring[6]. This is reinforced by additional steric bulk in the other substituent[6,9]. 

The identification of a specific nitrating species can be approached by comparing selectivity with that of nitration under conditions known to involve the nitronium ion. Examination of part B of Table 10.7 shows that the position selectivity exhibited by acetyl nitrate toward toluene and ethylbenzene is not dramatically different from that observed with nitronium ion. The data for i-propylbenzene suggest a lower ortho para ratio for acetyl nitrate nitrations. This could indicate a larger steric factor for nitration by acetyl nitrate. 

One other feature of the data in Table 10.10 is worthy of further comment Notice that alkyl substituted acylium ions exhibit a smaller ortho para ratio than the various arpyl systems. If steric factors were dominating the position selectivity, one would expect the opposite result A possible explanation for this feature of the data could be that the aryl compounds are reacting via free acylium ions, whereas the alkyl systems may involve more bulky acyl chloride-catalyst complexes. 

Table 11.3 compares observed rate constants for several reactions with those predicted by collision theory, arbitrarily taking p = 1. As you might expect, the calculated k s are too high, suggesting that the steric factor is indeed less than 1. 

A clear demonstration of the relative importance of steric and resonance factors in radical additions to carbon-carbon double bonds can be found by considering the effect of (non-polar) substituents on the rate of attack of (nonpolar) radicals. Substituents on the double bond strongly retard addition at the substituted carbon while leaving the rate of addition to the other end essentially unaffected (for example, Table 1.3). This is in keeping with expectation if steric factors determine the regiospeeificity of addition, but contrary to expectation if resonance factors are dominant. 

The kinetic product distribution appears to be determined by steric factors ex-substitution favors quinonemethide formation ring substitution favors a,cx-coupling. However, since quinonemethide formation is reversible, the only iso table product is often that from a,a-coupling. 

Grant et a/.397 examined the reactions of hydroxy radicals with a range of vinyl and a-methylvinyl monomers in organic media. Hydroxy radicals on reaction with AMS give significant yields of products from head addition, abstraction and aromatic substitution (Table 3.8) even though resonance and steric factors combine to favor "normal tail addition. However, it is notable that the extents of abstraction (with AMS and MMA) arc less than obtained with t-butoxy radicals and the amounts of head addition (with MMA and S) are no greater than those seen with benzoyloxy radicals under similar conditions. It is clear that there is no direct correlation between reaclion rale and low specificity. 

For the determination of stabilizations of carbonium ions the equilibrium constants of carbonylation-decarbonylation have been used in previous Sections. For the ions discussed in this Seetion, however, the rate constants of decarbonylation are not known and, therefore, the rate constants of carbonylation will be used as a criterion for such stabilizations. This kinetic criterion is a useful indicator if there are no significant steric factors in the carbonylation step and if this step is indeed rate-determining in the overall process (Hogeveen and Gaasbeek, 1970). The following rate constants in Table 2 are of particular importance. 

These differences have been attributed to various factors caused by the introduction of new structural features. Thus isopentane has a tertiary carbon whose C—H bond does not have exactly the same amount of s character as the C—H bond in pentane, which for that matter contains secondary carbons not possessed by methane. It is known that D values, which can be measured, are not the same for primary, secondary, and tertiary C—H bonds (see Table 5.3). There is also the steric factor. Hence, it is certainly not correct to use the value of 99.5 kcal mol (416 kJ mol ) from methane as the E value for all C—H bonds. Several empirical equations have been devised that account for these factors the total energy can be computed if the proper set of parameters (one for each structural feature) is inserted. Of course these parameters are originally calculated from the known total energies of some molecules that contain the structural feature. 

The steric factor proposed by Burnell and coworkers cannot be applicable for ionic substituents X (see Table 6). 

Steric factors and especially hindered rotations may change the pATa of an acid by up to two pAfa units as has been found for 2,6-disubstituted pyridines 2,6-di-t-butylpyridine [70k] is an unusual (Kanner, 1982) non-nucleophilic base which has a surprisingly low pKa value. When [70k] is compared to other 2,6-dialkylsubstituted pyridines [70] it is found to be the only disubstituted pyridine with a smaller pKa than pyridine itself (see Table 29). The exceptional behaviour of [70k] has been investigated intensively... 

Table 2-1 lists some examples of carboxylic acid imidazolides of various structures prepared by the use of A -carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), A -thiocarbonyldiimidazole (Im-CS-Im), and A -sulfinyldiimidazole (Im-SO-Im). Independent of the specific method applied, the data in Table 2-1 show that reasonable yields of imidazolides and diimidazolides are quite general, irrespective of various substituents and of steric factors. The rather mild reaction conditions also permit the formation of imidazolides of highly unsaturated systems. As a further advantage, it should be mentioned that almost all imidazolides are crystalline compounds, which can be conveniently handled. Melting points are therefore included for the imidazolides listed in Table 2—1. 

Nenajdenko et al. described the first example of addition of a 1,2-dication to C-C mutiple bonds. The only S-S dication found to participate in this reaction was the highly strained dication 115 derived from 1,4-dithiane. The reaction with alkenes 119 proceeded under mild conditions and led to derivatives of dithioniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane 120 as shown in Equation (33) and Table 21 <1998JOC2168>. This reaction was sensitive to steric factors and proceeded only with mono and 1,2-disubstituted ethylenes. Only alkenes conjugated with aromatic or cyclopropane moieties underwent this reaction. For the 1,2-disubstituted alkenes used in this study, the relative configuration of substitutents at the double bond was preserved and only one diastereomer was formed (see entries 2 and 3). 

For cyclopropanations with ethyl diazoacetate, a rather weak influence of the olefin structure has been noted 59 60, (Table 7). The preference for the sterically less crowded cyclopropane is more marked for 1,2-disubstituted than for 1,1-disubstituted olefins. The influence of steric factors becomes obvious from the fact that the ratio Z-36/E-36, obtained upon cyclopropanation of silyl enol ethers 35, parallels Knorr s 90> empirical substituent parameter A.d of the group R 60). These ZjE ratios, however, do not represent the thermodynamic equilibrium of both diastereomers. 

Rotational diffusion of particles occurs in polymer much slowly than in liquids. Therefore, the observed difference in liquid (k ) and solid polymer (ks) rate constants can be explained by the different rates of reactant orientation in the liquid and polymer. The EPR spectra were obtained for the stable nitroxyl radical (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-benzoyloxypiperidine-l-oxyl). The molecular mobility was calculated from the shape of the EPR spectrum of this radical [14,15], These values were used for the estimation of the orientation rate of reactants in the liquid and polymer cage. The frequency of orientation of the reactant pairs was calculated as vor = Pvrot> where P is the steric factor of the reaction, and vIol is the frequency of particle rotation to the angle equal to 4tt. The results of this comparison are given in Table 19.2. 

The diastereoselectivity is striking. Even when steric factors are not overwhelming (eq. Table 2, entries 5, 9, 22, 29, 30, and 33) only a single oxaspiropentane was detected. A particularly useful aspect of this reaction deals with carbonyl partners that are easily epimerized at the a-carbon. It appears that epimerization is faster than carbonyl addition. However, since one of the two epimers reacts faster than the other, only a single diastereomeric oxaspiropentane still results. For example, 2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclopentanone exists as an Zs.Z-mixture (see Eq. 29)47). For steric reasons, the Z isomer reacts faster than the E isomer which leads to 12 as the... 

Jin et al. [487] synthesized and studied the PL and EL properties of polymers 403 and 404 that differ by the position of the alkoxy substituent in the phenyl ring, expecting different distortion of the polymer main chain (and consequently conjugation length) due to different steric factors for para- and ort/zo-substitution (Chart 2.98). The absorption spectrum of the ortho-polymer 403 showed a substantial blue shift of 40 nm compared to para 404 and a decrease in EL turn-on voltage (4.5 and 6.5 V, respectively). Both polymers demonstrated nearly the same PL and EL maxima (Table 2.1). 

---