Statistical process control , separators

The alternative is hexane, which because of the explosion hazard requires a more expensive type of extractor construction. After the extraction the product is dull gray. The continuos sheet is slit to the final width according to customer requirements, searched by fully automatic detectors for any pinholes, wound into rolls of about 1 m diameter (corresponding to a length of 900-1000 m), and packed for shipping. Such a continuous production process is excellently suited for supervision by modern quality assurance systems, such as statistical process control (SPC). Figures 7-9 give a schematic picture of the production process for microporous polyethylene separators. 

Examples of this type of data are, e.g., from the field of process modeling and multivariate statistical process control. Suppose that process measurements are taken from a chemical reactor during a certain period of time. In the same time period, process measurements are taken from the separation column following that reactor as a unit operation. The composition of the product leaving the column is also measured in the same time period and with the same measurement frequency as the process measurements. This results in three blocks of data, with one mode in common. Relationships between these blocks can be sought and, e.g., used to develop control charts [Kourti et al. 1995, MacGregor et al. 1994],... 

You almost do not find an HPLC without a PC any more. The PC handles data evaluation, instrument management, optimization of the separation, validation, statistics, statistical process control. The PC is extremely powerful, but its potential is rarely fully appreciated. 

A good lamination cycle produces a flat ML-PWB that is free of moisture or voids and has a fully cured substrate. All layers must be well registered. The ML-PWB must be free of warp and the thickness must be within the specification. Any controlled impedance layers mnst have the correct pressed dielectric separations above and below the signal layer. Each of these requirements puts special demands on the lamination process. To assist in setting control measures, the following process indicators (see Table 27.6) should be monitored with a Statistical Process Control (SPC) method. 

Once the preliminary error checking of the raw data has been done, the control samples should be separated from the normal samples for more detailed examination. This process of separation is greatly aided by the inclusion of the STD SAMP field in the field database (see earlier) and a comprehensive sample list that identifies control samples and their relationships (Fig. 5.3). Control sample results can then be subjected to a number of statistical and plotting procedures that determine the accuracy and precision of results. These processes give an indication of the levels of uncertainty that are associated with the results, information that is essential to interpret the data and present it in a meaningful manner. 

At the production line in question, the profiles surface quality and cross-section geometry deviation was already analyzed and recorded by online optical quality inspection systems. These camera based systems usually mark defective profile sections visibly, to separate them out for the operating personnel [910]. In some cases, this data was analyzed to quantify the amount and kind of failures statistically to control the rate of production faults. For an integrated management of process, user interaction, and fault information, and quantitative quality data, the records of these inspection systems also had to be integrated. 

When designing and evaluating an analytical method, we usually make three separate considerations of experimental error. First, before beginning an analysis, errors associated with each measurement are evaluated to ensure that their cumulative effect will not limit the utility of the analysis. Errors known or believed to affect the result can then be minimized. Second, during the analysis the measurement process is monitored, ensuring that it remains under control. Finally, at the end of the analysis the quality of the measurements and the result are evaluated and compared with the original design criteria. This chapter is an introduction to the sources and evaluation of errors in analytical measurements, the effect of measurement error on the result of an analysis, and the statistical analysis of data. 

Decision Process. In many cases, the decision regarding the need for exposure reduction measures is obvious and no formal statistical procedure is necessary. However, as exposure criteria are lowered, and control becomes more difficult, close calls become more common, and a logical decision-making process is needed. A typical process is shown in Eigure 2. Even when decision making is easy it is useful to remember the process and the assumptions involved. Based on an evaluation, decisions are made regarding control. The evaluation and decision steps caimot be separated because the conduct of the evaluation, the strategy, measurement method, and data collection are all a part of the decision process. 

Although dose-response assessments for deterministic and stochastic effects are discussed separately in this Report, it should be appreciated that many of the concepts discussed in Section 3.2.1.2 for substances that cause deterministic effects apply to substances that cause stochastic effects as well. The processes of hazard identification, including identification of the critical response, and development of data on dose-response based on studies in humans or animals are common to both types of substances. Based on the dose-response data, a NOAEL or a LOAEL can be established based on the limited ability of any study to detect statistically significant increases in responses in exposed populations compared with controls, even though the dose-response relationship is assumed not to have a threshold. Because of the assumed form of the dose-response relationship, however, NOAEL or LOAEL is not normally used as a point of departure to establish safe levels of exposure to substances causing stochastic effects. This is in contrast to the common practice for substances causing deterministic effects of establishing safe levels of exposure, such as RfDs, based on NOAEL or LOAEL (or the benchmark dose) and the use of safety and uncertainty factors. 

When more than one state correlates with the electronic states of the separated species, collisions populate the various molecular states at statistically controlled relative rates. If more than one such state is bound, then it may be stabilized in a third-order process. For complex species, the rate of predissociation of the energy-rich complex, that is, k i[Rt], depends on its dissociation energy, so the ground-state complex will survive longest and have the highest chance of being collisionally stabilized. For diatomic molecules, for example, N2, 02, and NO, dipole transitions from these excited states to the ground state are not fully allowed and the excited species are almost certainly quenched in collisions. 

---