Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Statistical probability, calculation

In order to assess the analysis given in Figures 1 and 2 in terms of the components 1 and 2, the theoretically predicted abundances of the two components were calculated at 30 K, using the ZPVE values from Table 3. Including the statistical factors, the ratio obtained from the ZPVE s is 0.31 0.69, implying that substitution at the H2 position is slightly favoured compared to the purely statistical probability, as expected from the difference in bond strengths bewtween Cj—H and C2—H2. In a comparision with the... [Pg.352]

In brief, the statistical probability for the occurrence of a transition can be calculated and lies between zero and one. It can be shown that weak... [Pg.274]

It is useful to look at this visually. Figure 3.2 plots each of the outcomes on the x-axis with the corresponding probabilities, calculated when the null hypothesis is true, on the y-axis. Note that the x-axis has been labelled according to heads -tails (H —L), the number of heads minus the number of tails. This identifies each outcome uniquely and allows us to express each data value as a difference. More generally we will label this the test statistic, it is the statistic that the p-value calculation is based. The graph and the associated table of probabilities are labelled the null distribution (of the test statistic). [Pg.50]

It must be stressed, because this error is often made, that the probability calculated above is not the probability of the truth of Hq. It is the probability that, given the truth of Hp, in a repeated measurement an equal or more extreme value of the test statistic will be found. [Pg.38]

Figure 1 Quenching of ethidium bromide fluorescence by amsacrine in the presence of poly(dA-dT)-poly(dA-dT). ( ) Steady-state intensity and ( ) integrated fluorescence decay (Scxt). (Data compiled from Refs. 2 and 3, respectively.) [EB+] = 2 pM [bp] = 20 pM buffer is 0.01 M SHE (9.4 mM NaCl, 2 mM N-(2-hydroxylethyl)piperazine-N-2-ethan-sulfonate (pH 7), 20 pM EDTA). The solid line is quenching calculated using statistical probabilities to model the binding distribution and allowing complete quenching of only nearest neighbors (sphere of action of radius 3.4 A) [28]. Figure 1 Quenching of ethidium bromide fluorescence by amsacrine in the presence of poly(dA-dT)-poly(dA-dT). ( ) Steady-state intensity and ( ) integrated fluorescence decay (Scxt). (Data compiled from Refs. 2 and 3, respectively.) [EB+] = 2 pM [bp] = 20 pM buffer is 0.01 M SHE (9.4 mM NaCl, 2 mM N-(2-hydroxylethyl)piperazine-N-2-ethan-sulfonate (pH 7), 20 pM EDTA). The solid line is quenching calculated using statistical probabilities to model the binding distribution and allowing complete quenching of only nearest neighbors (sphere of action of radius 3.4 A) [28].
Traditionally statistics books used to emphasize P values. This was probably because the manual calculation of whether or not P is less than 0.05 is quite manageable, but for many statistical tests, calculation of the exact limits of the 95 per cent Cl can be pretty arduous. However, modern computer-based statistical packages remove that problem. Our choice of approach should now be based upon a consideration of what... [Pg.86]

The class distance can be calculated as the geometric distance from die PC models see die illustration in Figure 4.35. The unknown is much closer to die plane formed than the line, and so is tentatively assigned to diis class. A more elaborate approach is often employed in which each group is bounded by a region of space, which represents 95 % confidence that a particular object belongs to a class. Hence geometric class distances can be converted to statistical probabilities. [Pg.245]

Let us calculate the maximum number N of compounds acceptable if we require p = 90 %, i.e. 9 chances out of 10 to have only one compound per peak, in the case of a resolution of 1000. We find N = 14. Of these 14 peaks, statistically 1 out of 10 will contain two unseparated compounds. This example shows that the statistical probability of having two compounds per peak is very high. Figure 5.1 shows these results graphically, from a more elaborate statistical analysis [7]. [Pg.218]

Quantum mechanical, classical and statistical probabilities agree, on average, reasonably well with the experimental results [133] shown in Fig. 37 (vibrational distributions of NO were also measured by Harrison et al. [310]). In the experiment a high population of the state n o = 1 is found already 100 cm above its threshold. Moreover, the measured probabilities show some indications of fluctuations. Because of the limited number of data points, the inevitable incoherent averaging over several overall rotational states of NO2 and the averaging over the various possible electronic states of the 0 and NO products, these fluctuations are less pronounced than in the quantum mechanical calculations on a single adiabatic PES and for J = 0. [Pg.197]

The following residence times have been calculated for carbon (Garrels et al., 1975) 11 y in the biosphere, 4 y in the atmosphere, 385 y in the hydrosphere, and 342 M y in the lithosphere. These calculations represent, in a sense, the statistical probability of positioning an orbiting average... [Pg.36]

The Student /-factor depends on the statistical probability P and the number of degree of freedoms / = n—1. As a certain statistical relevance P must be chosen for the calculation of T, and has to be taken into account in the interpretation of the result, the result is given in %P ... [Pg.340]

The Type I error (rejection of the reduced model in favor of the full model) that would result from the use of the theoretical critical value was assessed for each of the designs considered, and for three alternative NONMEM linearization methods first-order (FO), first-order conditional estimation (FOCE), and first-order conditional estimation with interaction (FOCEI). Type I error rates were assessed by empirical determination of the probability of rejection of the reduced model, given that the reduced model was the correct model. Data sets were simulated with the reduced model (FO, 1000 data sets FOCE/FOCEI, 200 data sets) and fitted using the full and reduced models. The empirical Type I error was determined as the percentage of simulated data sets for which a LRT statistic of 3.84 or greater was obtained. The 3.84 critical value for the LRT statistic corresponds to a significance level of 5%, for a distribution with 1 degree of freedom (for the one extra parameter in the full model). The LRT statistic was calculated as the difference between the NONMEM objective function values of the reduced and full models. The results of these simulations were also used to determine an empirical critical value that would result in the Type I error rate equal to the nominal 5% value. [Pg.319]

When choosing an analytical method to analyze a sample you need to consider a number of things including the level of precision required. This is done by comparing the variances of the analytical methods. To decide if there is a significant difference between variances the probability associated with the Fisher /-statistic is calculated. Given two standard deviations sr and s2, where, v, > s2... [Pg.87]

Reactions a and b occur with statistical probability giving long chain ketone and butyl ketone, which are observable in these experiments. Model compound measurements show that in the n-butyl ketone group, the butyl C2 carbon resonance moves from 23.4 to 22.7 ppm, coinciding with the C2 resonance of "amyl + long branches, the intensity of which increases upon oxidation. By comparing these results quantitatively with the overall production of oxidized structures, the reactivity ratio of branch points to linear chains is calculated to be 9.8 . 1.0. This result is in agreement with the value of 8 derived from model hydrocarbon oxidation studies (15). [Pg.146]

In most cases, s is not a good estimate of cr because we have not made enough rephcate analyses. In this case, the CL is calculated using a statistical probability parameter. Student s t. The parameter t is defined as t = (x — ii)/s and the CL for p, = X + ts/ /N. An abbreviated set of t values is given in Table 1.9 complete tables can be found in mathematics handbooks or statistics books. [Pg.37]

The treatment of particles by the principles of wave mechanics results in a complete blurring of their identity as individuals. The calculation of statistical probability is profoundly modified thereby and a reformulation of Boltzmann s rules for calculating entropy... [Pg.135]


See other pages where Statistical probability, calculation is mentioned: [Pg.108]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.734]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 ]




SEARCH



Probability calculation

Statistical probabilities

© 2024 chempedia.info