Standard states unsymmetrical

In a binary liquid solution containing one noncondensable and one condensable component, it is customary to refer to the first as the solute and to the second as the solvent. Equation (13) is used for the normalization of the solvent s activity coefficient but Equation (14) is used for the solute. Since the normalizations for the two components are not the same, they are said to follow the unsymmetric convention. The standard-state fugacity of the solvent is the fugacity of the pure liquid. The standard-state fugacity of the solute is Henry s constant. 

The use of Henry s constant for a standard-state fugacity means that the standard-state fugacity for a noncondensable component depends not only on the temperature but also on the nature of the solvent. It is this feature of the unsymmetric convention which is its greatest disadvantage. As a result of this disadvantage special care must be exercised in the use of the unsymmetric convention for multicomponent solutions, as discussed in Chapter 4. 

The standard-state fugacity of any component must be evaluated at the same temperature as that of the solution, regardless of whether the symmetric or unsymmetric convention is used for activity-coefficient normalization. But what about the pressure At low pressures, the effect of pressure on the thermodynamic properties of condensed phases is negligible and under such con-... 

The difficulties engendered by a hypothetical liquid standard state can be eliminated by the use of unsymmetrically normalized activity coefficients. These have been used for many years in other areas of solution thermodynamics (e.g., for solutions of electrolytes or polymers in liquid solvents) but they have only recently been employed in high-pressure vapor-liquid equilibria (P7). 

The standard state given by the unsymmetric convention for normalization has one very important advantage it avoids all arbitrariness about/2°, which is an experimentally accessible quantity the definition off2° given by Eq. (37) assures that the activity coefficient of component 2 is unambiguously defined as well as unambiguously normalized. There is no fundamental arbitrariness about f2° because Hl2p(M) can be determined from experimental measurements. 

According to the above definitions, AG/ (0 = 0) calculated from Eq. (30a), refers to the unsymmetrical standard-state system at the surface (system 3). In order to refer AG/ values to a symmetrical standard-state system 1, the following correction ought to be made ... 

Therefore the determination of the standard Gibbs energies of adsorption at various symmetrical or unsymmetrical standard states leads directly to derivation of the particle-particle interaction parameter. The same result may be obtained from the difference of AG"" values calculated at zero surface coverage (0 = 0) and at saturated surface coverage (0=1), using Eqs. (30a) and (30b). 

Klotz (1964) points out that these definitions of activity for unsymmetrical salts imply new and rather strange standard states for these electrolytes. If we insist on having, for example,... 

Fig. 17.5. Schematic representation of the fugacity of an unsymmetrical salt (BaCh) versus tttLcij > illustrating the fact that the standard state chosen is not given by the Henry s Law slope at 1.0 m as in Figure 17.3, but 1/4 of this.

Polar hydrophilic components are represented in solution by ions, which do not exist in pure form. So, for them is used an unsymmetric system of standards where activity equal 1 in pure form has only the solvent. For the dissolved ions as standard state are accepted their hypothetical single-molar solutions with properties of infinitely diluted one. In particular, the concentration of polar component under standard conditions is characterized by values not of the partial pressure but of molality C° = 1 mole kg. ... 

Fluctuation Solution Theory (FST) At infinite dilution the solubility expression contains no hypothetical chemical potential of the solute [4, 45], For dilute solutions, the Henry s law standard state can be more reliable than the pure component standard state since the unsymmetric convention activity coefficients, designated by y., are often very close to unity, y is related to y. by... 

It will be useful to have an expression for the Gibbs energy of mixing of real solutions. This is a bit more complicated for aqueous systems which are unsymmetrical, that is, which have different standard states for the solvent and solute, and a completely different method of expressing deviations from ideality - osmotic coefficients for the solvent, and Henryan activity coefficients for the solutes. This development follows Pitzer (1991). 

In the unsymmetric standard state convention, where the solvent is referenced to its pure state (Raoult s law reference state) and the solutes to the infinite dilution state (Henry s law reference state), the standard partial molar volume is equal to the pressure derivative of the chemical potential at... 

As long as the solution is dilute, Henry s constant is sufficient but as the concentration of solute rises, unsymmetrically normalized activity coefficients must be Introduced and at present we have little experience with these. While binary mixtures can be handled with relative ease, major formal difficulties arise when we go to multicomponent mixtures because, unfortunately, Henry s constant depends on both solute and solvent and, therefore, when we have several solvents present, we must be very careful to define our standard states and corresponding activity coefficients in a thermodynamically consistent way. 

Henry s law makes a strange standard state, because its f° = Hi does not correspond to the behavior of pure i but rather to the behavior of i in the solution as x,- —> 0.00. This is one of the reasons it says in Chapter 7 that is sometimes chosen to correspond to the fugacity of pure i at this temperature and pressure and sometimes not. For dissolved oxygen in liquid water at 68°F there is no pure state of pure liquid oxygen, because oxygen cannot exist as a liquid at this temperature. The fact that Henry s law leads to this strange value off seems to have no practical consequences, and is pointed out here only to remind the reader that we make several choices for f°, some of them not very intuitive. (Some authors make much of this unimportant distinction, under the name unsymmetrical standard states.)... 

Vougioukalakis and Grubbs extended the studies on complexes containing unsymmetrical flouroaryl-substituted NHCs (Figure 11.19) [92]. Thus, complexes 96-101 were prepared, fully characterized, and tested for the catalytic activity in RCM of standard substrate 17, ROMP of 25, and CM of 27 with 28. While the complexes were quite stable in solid state, increasing the number of fluorine substitution led to a decrease in the catalytic activity. As in the previous... 

---