Liquid standard state

Water can act as either an acid or a base, depending on the circumstances. This ability to act as either an acid or a base is referred to by stating that water is amphoteric. Water serves as a base in (17-3) and as an acid in (17-4). Note that the bare H+ (a proton) becomes the hydronium ion, H30+, which is a hydrated proton (H30+ is H+ + H2O) because the bare proton does not really exist in solution. When we write the equilibrium constant expression for an aqueous equilibrium, we can use either the hydrogen ion, H+, or the hydrated form, H30+. Although the proton is hydrated in aqueous solution (as is the hydroxide), the use of H+ and H30+ is up to the style of the person working the problem and the problem itself. More often than not, leaving out water on both sides of the equation is used to keep the solutions to the problems visually simple. So long as water is in its standard state (liquid), it is not included in the K expression and, therefore, not necessary in the chemical equation. 

This means that the standard enthalpy of reaction at another temperature can be calculated when the heat capacities Cp. in the standard state (liquid, solid, and hypothetical ideal gas) of the compounds involved are known. The temperature dependence of the heat capacities can be described, for example, by a polynomial of the following form ... 

It is strictly for convenience that certain conventions have been adopted in the choice of a standard-state fugacity. These conventions, in turn, result from two important considerations (a) the necessity for an unambiguous thermodynamic treatment of noncondensable components in liquid solutions, and (b) the relation between activity coefficients given by the Gibbs-Duhem equation. The first of these considerations leads to a normalization for activity coefficients for nonoondensable components which is different from that used for condensable components, and the second leads to the definition and use of adjusted or pressure-independent activity coefficients. These considerations and their consequences are discussed in the following paragraphs. 

For such components, as the composition of the solution approaches that of the pure liquid, the fugacity becomes equal to the mole fraction multiplied by the standard-state fugacity. In this case,the standard-state fugacity for component i is the fugacity of pure liquid i at system temperature T. In many cases all the components in a liquid mixture are condensable and Equation (13) is therefore used for all components in this case, since all components are treated alike, the normalization of activity coefficients is said to follow the symmetric convention. ... 

In a binary liquid solution containing one noncondensable and one condensable component, it is customary to refer to the first as the solute and to the second as the solvent. Equation (13) is used for the normalization of the solvent s activity coefficient but Equation (14) is used for the solute. Since the normalizations for the two components are not the same, they are said to follow the unsymmetric convention. The standard-state fugacity of the solvent is the fugacity of the pure liquid. The standard-state fugacity of the solute is Henry s constant. 

We find that the standard-state fugacity fV is the fugacity of pure liquid i at the temperature of the solution and at the reference pressure P. ... 

In some cases, the temperature of the system may be larger than the critical temperature of one (or more) of the components, i.e., system temperature T may exceed T. . In that event, component i is a supercritical component, one that cannot exist as a pure liquid at temperature T. For this component, it is still possible to use symmetric normalization of the activity coefficient (y - 1 as x - 1) provided that some method of extrapolation is used to evaluate the standard-state fugacity which, in this case, is the fugacity of pure liquid i at system temperature T. For highly supercritical components (T Tj,.), such extrapolation is extremely arbitrary as a result, we have no assurance that when experimental data are reduced, the activity coefficient tends to obey the necessary boundary condition 1... 

Equation (23) holds only when, for every component i, the same standard-state fugacity is used in both liquid phases. 

Enthalpies are referred to the ideal vapor. The enthalpy of the real vapor is found from zero-pressure heat capacities and from the virial equation of state for non-associated species or, for vapors containing highly dimerized vapors (e.g. organic acids), from the chemical theory of vapor imperfections, as discussed in Chapter 3. For pure components, liquid-phase enthalpies (relative to the ideal vapor) are found from differentiation of the zero-pressure standard-state fugacities these, in turn, are determined from vapor-pressure data, from vapor-phase corrections and liquid-phase densities. If good experimental data are used to determine the standard-state fugacity, the derivative gives enthalpies of liquids to nearly the same precision as that obtained with calorimetric data, and provides reliable heats of vaporization. 

Appendix C-2 gives constants for the zero-pressure, pure-liquid, standard-state fugacity equation for condensable components and constants for the hypothetical liquid standard-state fugacity equation for noncondensable components... 

PURE calculates pure liquid standard-state fugacities at zero pressure, pure-component saturated liquid molar volume (cm /mole), and pure-component liquid standard-state fugacities at system pressure. Pure-component hypothetical liquid reference fugacities are calculated for noncondensable components. Liquid molar volumes for noncondensable components are taken as zero. 

Standard-state fugacities at zero pressure are evaluated using the Equation (A-2) for both condensable and noncondensable components. The Rackett Equation (B-2) is evaluated to determine the liquid molar volumes as a function of temperature. Standard-state fugacities at system temperature and pressure are given by the product of the standard-state fugacity at zero pressure and the Poynting correction shown in Equation (4-1). Double precision is advisable. 

FO(I) Vector (length 20) of pure-component liquid standard-state fugacities at zero pressure or hypothetical liquid standard-... 

The adsorbed state often seems to resemble liquid adsorbate, as in the approach of the heat of adsorption to the heat of condensation in the multilayer region. For this reason, a common choice for the standard state of free adsorbate is the pure liquid. We now have... 

The standard state of a substance in a condensed phase is the real liquid or solid at 1 atm and T. 

The values of the thermodynamic properties of the pure substances given in these tables are, for the substances in their standard states, defined as follows For a pure solid or liquid, the standard state is the substance in the condensed phase under a pressure of 1 atm (101 325 Pa). For a gas, the standard state is the hypothetical ideal gas at unit fugacity, in which state the enthalpy is that of the real gas at the same temperature and at zero pressure. 

The first term, AG°, is the change in Gibb s free energy under standard-state conditions defined as a temperature of 298 K, all gases with partial pressures of 1 atm, all solids and liquids pure, and all solutes present with 1 M concentrations. The second term, which includes the reaction quotient, Q, accounts for nonstandard-state pressures or concentrations. Eor reaction 6.1 the reaction quotient is... 

Treatment Standards of Liquid Redox Waste in California, State of California Department of Health Services, Toxic Substances Control Program, Alternative Technology Division, June 1990 TuphurPolymer Cement Concrete, Design and Construction Manual, The Sulphur Institute, Washington, D.C., 1994. 

II The increment in the free energy, AF, in the reaction of forming the given substance in its standard state from its elements in their standard states. The standard states are for a gas, fugacity (approximately equal to the pressure) of 1 atm for a pure liquid or solid, the substance at a pressure of 1 atm for a substance in aqueous solution, the hyj)othetical solution of unit molahty, which has all the properties of the infinitely dilute solution except the property of concentration. 

ITlie free energy of solution of a given substance from its normal standard state as a sohd, liquid, or gas to the hyj)othetical one molal state in aqueous solution may he calculated in a manner similar to that described in footnote for calculating the heat of solution. 

For species present as gases in the actual reac tive system, the standard state is the pure ideal gas at pressure P°. For liquids and solids, it is usually the state of pure real liquid or solid at P°. The standard-state pressure P° is fixed at 100 kPa. Note that the standard states may represent different physical states for different species any or all of the species may be gases, liquids, or solids. 

Energy balances differ from mass balances in that the total mass is known but the total energy of a component is difficult to express. Consequently, the heat energy of a material is usually expressed relative to its standard state at a given temperature. For example, the heat content, or enthalpy, of steam is expressed relative to liquid water at 273 K (0°C) at a pressure equal to its own vapor pressure. 

Electrode Potential (E) the difference in electrical potential between an electrode and the electrolyte with which it is in contact. It is best given with reference to the standard hydrogen electrode (S.H.E.), when it is equal in magnitude to the e.m.f. of a cell consisting of the electrode and the S.H.E. (with any liquid-junction potential eliminated). When in such a cell the electrode is the cathode, its electrode potential is positive when the electrode is the anode, its electrode potential is negative. When the species undergoing the reaction are in their standard states, E =, the stan-... 

For liquid mixtures at low pressures, it is not important to specify with care the pressure of the standard state because at low pressures the thermodynamic properties of liquids, pure or mixed, are not sensitive to the pressure. However, at high pressures, liquid-phase properties are strong functions of pressure, and we cannot be careless about the pressure dependence of either the activity coefficient or the standard-state fugacity. 

The most frequently used standard state is the pure liquid (x = 1) at the system temperature and pressure. When this standard state is used for all components in the mixture, the activity coefficients are said to be symmetrically normalized, because in this case, for every component /,... 

It is sometimes preferable to define the standard state as the pure liquid at the system temperature and at its own saturation pressure. For any component i for which this convention is used, the normalization is also given by Eq. (34). 

The difficulties engendered by a hypothetical liquid standard state can be eliminated by the use of unsymmetrically normalized activity coefficients. These have been used for many years in other areas of solution thermodynamics (e.g., for solutions of electrolytes or polymers in liquid solvents) but they have only recently been employed in high-pressure vapor-liquid equilibria (P7). 

For the solvent (component 1),/° is the fugacity of pure saturated liquid 1 at the system temperature. However, the standard-state fugacity for the solute (component 2) is given by... 

Since Eqs. (5) and (6) are not restricted to the vapor phase, they can, in principle, be used to calculate fugacities of components in the liquid phase as well. Such calculations can be performed provided we assume the validity of an equation of state for a density range starting at zero density and terminating at the liquid density of interest. That is, if we have a pressure-explicit equation of state which holds for mixtures in both vapor and liquid phases, then we can use Eq. (6) to solve completely the equations of equilibrium without explicitly resorting to the auxiliary-functions activity, standard-state fugacity, and partial molar volume. Such a procedure was discussed many years ago by van der Waals and, more recently, it has been reduced to practice by Benedict and co-workers (B4). 

---