Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard hybridization

Nallur et al. (39) demonstrated that RCA is a sensitive method for detecting nucleic acid signals of microarrays. They reported that for DNA targets there was at least an 8000-fold increase in detection sensitivity over standard hybridization under the same conditions. Although this indicates a great potential to amplify signal from very small amounts of hybridized material, it is necessary to alter the hybridization protocol to account for the corresponding hybridization kinetics. [Pg.9]

The active groups on the slide surface should be deactivated during the post array processing. However, a prehybridization of bulk DNA to the slide can ensure a clean background (use general blocking reagents as mentioned below for the hybridization step). This prehybridization should take place immediately prior to hybridization and is based on standard hybridization protocols. [Pg.108]

Hybridization components such as SDS and SSC fluoresce and, unless washed from the slide surface prior to scanning, will cause diffuse low-level background. This background can be minimized by immediately spin-drying slides by low-velocity centrifugation after washing. Washing is based on standard hybridization protocols. [Pg.108]

Tab. 12.2 Power requirements and approximate production capacities of standard Hybridization systems (according to Nara, Tokyo, Japan). Tab. 12.2 Power requirements and approximate production capacities of standard Hybridization systems (according to Nara, Tokyo, Japan).
Carbocations have a vacant orbital that bears a positive charge. Within the standard hybridization framework, there are five possible hybridization types if all the electrons are paired. [Pg.300]

Valence shell electron pair repulsion, VSEPR. A mental tool used to predict deviations from standard hybridized bond angles based on how much of the surface area of an atom a given electron pair in its outer shell occupies. [Pg.112]

Nevertheless, in order to keep an optimistic conclusion, if IPs with an accuracy better than 0.1 eV cannot yet be reached with standard hybrid functionals used in this work, they are already a promising computational tool for the study of ionizations potentials of large heteroatomic systems. [Pg.103]

Any biointeraction e.g. a standard hybridization is a useful tool to assemble colloidal particles in solution or at surfaces. By use of this technique arrays of colloids are easily obtained at a substrate surface. These particle arrays deviate in their optical and electrical behavior from single isolated colloidal particles. [Pg.161]

Li [7] simulated the packed column as described in Sect. 4.2.1 by using Reynolds mass flux model instead of two-equation model and compared their difference. The simulated results for three forms of Reynolds mass flux model (standard, hybrid, and algebraic) are given in subsequent sections. [Pg.127]

Abstract In this chapter, the two CMT models, i.e., c — Eci model and Reynolds mass flux model (in standard, hybrid, and algebraic forms) are used for simulating the chemical absorption of CO2 in packed column by using MEA, AMP, and NaOH separately and their simulated results are closely checked with the experimental data. It is noted that the radial distribution of Di is similar to a, but quite different from fit. It means that the conventional assumption on the analogy between the momentum transfer and the mass transfer in turbulent fluids is unjustifled, and thus, the use of CMT method for simulation is necessary. In the analysis of the simulation results, some transport phenomena are interpreted in terms of the co-action or counteraction of the turbulent mass flux diffusion. [Pg.145]

To conclude this section, it is worth mentioning the EVB approach that has been extensively used by Warshel and his collaborators and is being increasingly used by other workers (see, for example. Ref. 16). This method is essentially similar in conception to the types of potential described here but it is different in that it uses a much simpler valence bond QM model of the reacting region. The method is much faster than standard hybrid potentials but the potential is less easy to use as it must be conceived and parametrized for each different problem studied. [Pg.434]

In particular, electron correlation effects are crucial to describe the vdW interaction. To account for the electron correlation effects, density functional theory (DFT) is widely used. As the former interaction is mainly caused by electrostatic interaction between the base pairs, it is sufficient to describe it with the hybrid DFT methods. On the other hand, it is rather difficult to describe the latter interaction by means of the standard hybrid DFT because of the lack of the weak dispersion force. The latter interaction is so weak that the post Hartree-Fock (HF) theories such as the second order of Mpller-Presset perturbation theory (MP2) and coupled-cluster method (CC) are at least required to describe it qualitatively. In 2004, Hobza et al. estimated accurate interaction energies between stacked bases by using MP2 based on the resolution of identity method (RI-MP2), with complete basis set (CBS) corrections [1,2]. [Pg.436]


See other pages where Standard hybridization is mentioned: [Pg.97]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.2981]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.1812]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.1083]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info