Standard deviation transformed data

The price of flexibility comes in the difficulty of mathematical manipulation of such distributions. For example, the 3-parameter Weibull distribution is intractable mathematically except by numerical estimation when used in probabilistic calculations. However, it is still regarded as a most valuable distribution (Bompas-Smith, 1973). If an improved estimate for the mean and standard deviation of a set of data is the goal, it has been cited that determining the Weibull parameters and then converting to Normal parameters using suitable transformation equations is recommended (Mischke, 1989). Similar estimates for the mean and standard deviation can be found from any initial distribution type by using the equations given in Appendix IX. 

Note. If the N dimensions yield very different numerical values, such as 105 3 mmol/L, 0.0034 0.02 meter, and 13200 600 pg/ml, the Euclidian distances are dominated by the contributions due to those dimensions for which the differences A-B, AS, or BS are numerically large. In such cases it is recommended that the individual results are first normalized, i.e., x = (x - Xn,ean)/ 5 t, where Xmean and Sx are the mean and standard deviation over all objects for that particular dimension X, by using option (Transform)/(Normalize) in program DATA. Use option (Transpose) to exchange columns and rows beforehand and afterwards The case presented in sample file SIEVEl.dat is different the individual results are wt-% material in a given size class, so that the physical dimension is the same for all rows. Since the question asked is are there differences in size distribution , normalization as suggested above would distort tbe information and statistics-of-small-numbers artifacts in the poorly populated size classes would become overemphasized. 

Scaling is a very important operation in multivariate data analysis and we will treat the issues of scaling and normalisation in much more detail in Chapter 31. It should be noted that scaling has no impact (except when the log transform is used) on the correlation coefficient and that the Mahalanobis distance is also scale-invariant because the C matrix contains covariance (related to correlation) and variances (related to standard deviation). 

In this case it is required that the original data in X are strictly positive. The effect of the transformation appears from Table 31.6. Column-means are zero, while column-standard deviations tend to be more homogeneous than in the case of simple column-centering in Table 31.4 as can be seen by inspecting the corresponding values for Na and Cl. 

The first is to normalize the data, making them suitable for analysis by our most common parametric techniques such as analysis of variance ANOYA. A simple test of whether a selected transformation will yield a distribution of data which satisfies the underlying assumptions for ANOYA is to plot the cumulative distribution of samples on probability paper (that is a commercially available paper which has the probability function scale as one axis). One can then alter the scale of the second axis (that is, the axis other than the one which is on a probability scale) from linear to any other (logarithmic, reciprocal, square root, etc.) and see if a previously curved line indicating a skewed distribution becomes linear to indicate normality. The slope of the transformed line gives us an estimate of the standard deviation. If... 

If the data distribution is extremely skewed it is advisable to transform the data to approach more symmetry. The visual impression of skewed data is dominated by extreme values which often make it impossible to inspect the main part of the data. Also the estimation of statistical parameters like mean or standard deviation can become unreliable for extremely skewed data. Depending on the form of skewness (left skewed or right skewed), a log-transformation or power transformation (square root, square, etc.) can be helpful in symmetrizing the distribution. 

As already noted in Section 1.6.1, many statistical estimators rely on symmetry of the data distribution. For example, the standard deviation can be severely increased if the data distribution is much skewed. It is thus often highly recommended to first transform the data to approach a better symmetry. Unfortunately, this has to be done for each variable separately, because it is not sure if one and the same transformation will be useful for symmetrizing different variables. For right-skewed data, the log transformation is often useful (that means taking the logarithm of the data values). More flexible is the power transformation which uses a power p to transform values x into xp. The value of p has to be optimized for each variable any real number is reasonable for p, except p 0 where a log-transformation has to be taken. A slightly modified version of the power transformation is the Box Cox transformation, defined as... 

Problems arise to get informations about the diffusion coeffients Ky and Kz. If equation (3.4) is interpreted as Gaussian distribution, a lot of available dispersion data can be taken into consideration because they are expressed in terms of standard deviations of the concentration distribution. Though there is no theoretical justification the Gaussian plume formula is converted to the K-theory expression by the transformation /11/... 

Construction of an Approximate Confidence Interval. An approxi-mate confidence interval can be constructed for an assumed class of distributions, if one is willing to neglect the bias introduced by the spline approximation. This is accomplished by estimation of the standard deviation in the transformed domain of y-values from the replicates. The degrees of freedom for this procedure is then diminished by one accounting for the empirical search for the proper transformation. If one accepts that the distribution of data can be approximated by a normal distribution the Student t-distribution gives... 

In Eq. 13.15, the squared standard deviations (variances) act as weights of the squared residuals. The standard deviations of the measurements are usually not known, and therefore an arbitrary choice is necessary. It should be stressed that this choice may have a large influence of the final best set of parameters. The scheme for appropriate weighting and, if appropriate, transformation of data (for example logarithmic transformation to fulfil the requirement of homoscedastic variance) should be based on reasonable assumptions with respect to the error distribution in the data, for example as obtained during validation of the plasma concentration assay. The choice should be checked afterwards, according to the procedures for the evaluation of goodness-of-fit (Section 13.2.8.5). 

If we are to use a log-normal distribution (or any other parametric distribution), values have to be assigned to the parameters, based on data or some rational argument. For the log-normal distribution, given the characterization of /< and a as log-scale mean and standard deviation, an obvious approach is to transform values in some suitable dataset to logarithms and use the sample mean (of the logarithms) to estimate fi, and sample standard deviation to estimate o. However, as for distributions of many types, there is more than 1 reasonable approach for estimating lognormal parameters. Below, a brief account is provided of estimation procedures and criteria for evaluation of estimation procedures. 

Confidence intervals nsing freqnentist and Bayesian approaches have been compared for the normal distribntion with mean p and standard deviation o (Aldenberg and Jaworska 2000). In particnlar, data on species sensitivity to a toxicant was fitted to a normal distribntion to form the species sensitivity distribution (SSD). Fraction affected (FA) and the hazardons concentration (HC), i.e., percentiles and their confidence intervals, were analyzed. Lower and npper confidence limits were developed from t statistics to form 90% 2-sided classical confidence intervals. Bayesian treatment of the uncertainty of p and a of a presupposed normal distribution followed the approach of Box and Tiao (1973, chapter 2, section 2.4). Noninformative prior distributions for the parameters p and o specify the initial state of knowledge. These were constant c and l/o, respectively. Bayes theorem transforms the prior into the posterior distribution by the multiplication of the classic likelihood fnnction of the data and the joint prior distribution of the parameters, in this case p and o (Fignre 5.4). 

Rowe NC. 1988. Absolute bounds on the mean and standard deviation of transformed data for constant-sign-derivative transformations. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 9 1098-1113. 

Cage cards that contain information such as animal number, study number, and treatment group are not raw data as long as no original observations are recorded on the card, nor are transformations of raw data (e.g., calculations of mean and standard deviation or other statistical values) considered raw data, because they can always be recalculated from the original raw data. 

A kind of logarithmic transform, such as In (1 -I- x), is used in spectral maps within row and column centring and global standardization (division by the standard deviation around the mean of all the values of the data matrix). 

If there are not enough data to calculate meaningful standard deviations at various levels, plotting the variables in pairs may often lead to the proper transformation. The following charts show how curved lines can be straightened out by the proper choice of transformations. In these cases, the variation is usually made constant at the same time. The left column shows the untransformed relationship the right shows the results of the transformation. 

Standard deviations in unit-cell parameters may be calculated analytically by error propagation. In these programs, however, the Jacobian of the transformation from Sj,. .., s6 to unit-cell parameters and volume is evaluated numerically and used to transform the variance-covariance matrix of Si,. .., s6 into the variances of the cell parameters and volume from which standard deviations are calculated. If suitable standard deviations are not obtained for certain of the unit cell parameters, it is easy to program the computer to measure additional reflections which strongly correlate with the desired parameters, and repeat the final calculations with this additional data. 

This empirical statistical function, based on the residual standard deviation (RSD), reaches a minimum when the correct number of factors are chosen. It allows one to reduce the number of columns of R from L to K eigenvectors or pure components. These K independent and orthogonal eigenvectors are sufficient to reproduce the original data matrix. As they are the result of a mathematical treatment of matrices, they have no physical meaning. A transformation (i.e. a rotation of the eigenvectors space) is required to find other equivalent eigenvectors which correspond to pure components. 

Transformation based on square root from data X = /X is applied when the test values and variances are proportional as in Poisson s distribution. If the data come from counting up and the number of units is below 10 transformation form X --fX + 1 and text X =s/X + /X I 1 is used. If the test averages and their standard deviations are approximately proportional, we use the logarithm transformation X =log X. If there are data with low values or they have a zero value, we use X =log (X+l). When the squares of arithmetical averages and standard deviations are proportional we use the reciprocal transformation X =l/X or X =1/(X+1) if the values are small or are equal to zero. The transformation arc sin [X is used when values are given as proportions and when the distribution is Binomial. If the test value of the experiment is zero then instead of it we take the value l/(4n), and when it is 1, l-l/(4n) is taken as the value and n is the number of values. Transforming values where the proportion varies between 0.30 and 0.70 is practically senseless. This transformation is done by means of special tables suited for the purpose. 

An analysis of regularities observed in species sensitivity distributions (SSD) fitted on acute and chronic aquatic toxicity data for a large number of organic and inorganic toxicants is provided by De Zwart (2002). The log-logistic sensitivity model he used is characterized by the parameter a, which is the mean of the observed loglO-transformed L(E)C50 or NOEC values over a variety of test species, and /3, a scale parameter proportional to the standard deviation of the loglO-transformed... 

Very often it is not possible a priori to separate contaminated and uncontaminated soils at the time of sampling. The best that can be done in this situation is to assume the data comprise several overlapping log-normal populations. A plot of percent cumulative frequency versus concentration (either arithmetic or log-transformed values) on probability paper produces a straight line for a normal or log-normal population. Overlapping populations plot as intersecting lines. These are called broken line plots and Tennant and White (1959) and Sinclair (1974) have explained how these composite curves may be partitioned so as to separate out the background population and then estimate its mean and standard deviation. Davies (1983) applied the technique to soils in England and Wales and thereby estimated the upper limits for lead content in uncontaminated soils. 

Once a scaling model has been found the scaled data should be examined carefully to ascertain that the variance is equal over the domain of the data. If not then a suitable transform must be found to equalize the variance. Otherwise, no single stochastic model will accurately reflect the probability of an occurrence of the "event" in question over the data domain, much less for an extrapolated prediction. For example, if the standard deviation is proportional to the mean, a very common situation in nature, the variance is equalized by taking the log of the model variable. This is the case for both of the above examples, where the probability model was fitting to In x rather than x itself. Suitable transformations for other common situations, as well as a general method for finding transforms is given by Johnson Leone (7). 

Heteroscedastic noise. This type of noise is dependent on signal intensity, often proportional to intensity. The noise may still be represented by a normal distribution, but the standard deviation of that distribution is proportional to intensity. A form of heteroscedastic noise often appears to arise if the data are transformed prior to processing, a common method being a logarithmic transform used in many types of spectroscopy such as UV/vis or IR spectroscopy, from transmittance to absorbance. The true noise distribution is imposed upon the raw data, but the transformed information distorts this. 

Transform the data first by taking logarithms and then standardising over die 14 training set samples (use the population standard deviation). Why are these transformations used ... 

Standardise this matrix, and explain why this transformation is important. Why is it normal to use the population rather than the sample standard deviation All calculations below should be performed on this standardised data matrix. 

---