Splitting of the data set

Additional steps in the exploration stage include the splitting of the data set in different representative subsets (see below), and the reduction of the dimensionality of the data both for the number of records/objects (sampling) and the number of features/variables (feature selection). 

The statistics of prediction of an independent external test set provide the best estimate of the performance of a model. However, the splitting of the data set in training set (used to develop the model) and the test set (used to estimate how well the model predicts unseen data) is not a suitable solution for small-sized data sets and an extensive use of internal validation procedures is recommend. 

FIGURE 8 Schematic representation of PLS (A) and iPLS (B) analysis of a data set. In tPLS, the splitting of the data set X is performed with i intervals equally sized and contiguous. 

The exclusive consideration of common factors seems to be promising, especially for such environmental analytical problems, as is shown by the variance splitting of the investigated data material (Tab. 7-2). Errors in the analytical process and feature-specific variances can be separated from the common reduced solution by means of estimation of the communalities. This shows the advantage of the application of FA, rather than principal components analysis, for such data structures. Because the total variance of the data sets has been investigated by principal components analysis, it is difficult to separate specific factors from common factors. Interpretation with regard to environmental analytical problems is, therefore at the very least rendered more difficult, if not even falsified for those analytical results which are relatively strongly affected by errors. 

Equation 1.10 describes this non-Kramers doublet behavior and its fit to the VTVH MCD data in Figure 1.12a (with orientation averaging for a frozen solution) allows the spin Hamiltonian parameters to be obtained.29,30 These, in turn, can be related to the ligand field splittings of the t2g set of d-orbitals, as described in Ref. 7, which probe the re-interactions of the Fe(II)... 

Two key questions in model selection are what proportion of molecules to use for a training set versus a test set when doing random splits of the data, and how many different training/test splits should be analyzed to obtain reliable inferences about model performance. The number of repetitions needed is surprisingly low and often the same decisions are made whether the number of training/test splits used was 200 or 20 or 10. 

The binary fuzzy partition of A does not represent real clusters. In this case the class zl, will be marked to avoid subsequent attempts to split it. The marked class will be allocated to a new fuzzy partition P. It is clear that P is a fuzzy partition of the data set X. 

Cross-validation is a leave-one-out or leave-some-out validation technique in which part of the data set is reserved for validation. Essentially, it is a data-splitting technique. The distinction lies within the manner of the split and the number of data sets evaluated. In the strict sense a -fold cross-validation involves the division of available data into k subsets of approximately equal size. Models are built k times, each time leaving out one of the subsets from the build. The k models are evaluated and compared as described previously, and a hnal model is dehned based on the complete data set. Again, this technique as well as all validation strategies offers flexibility in its application. Mandema et al. successfully utilized a cross-validation strategy for a population pharmacokinetic analysis with oxycodone in which a portion of the data was reserved for an evaluation of predictive performance. Although not strictly a cross-validation, it does illustrate the spirit of the approach. 

The construction of injury probability models can include the whole data set, as presented above, or can be performed using subgroups of the data set. In view of biomechanical differences [19-21], a splitting of the population into subgroups depending on age (e.g., 4-17, 18-64, 65-h) could help detect possible injury risk factors specific to particular age groups and improve the model quality. 

A quantile is a way of dividing the data set into segments based on the ordered rank of the data set. Common quantiles are the median (2 segments with the split at... 

---