Spin parity modeling

Fig. 6 High spin polyradical PAM26 (26 radical sites), designed by Rajca group using spin parity modeling.

Using the shell model, calculate the ground-state spins, parities, and magnetic... 

Scheme 3 Example applications of spin parity to alternant non-Kekule hydrocarbons. All of these are predicted triplet ground states by Hund s law-based models such as that of Longuet-Higgins.65.

Figure 7. Low lying nucleon (left plot) and delta (right plot) states with total spin and parity JT The left and right bars are the theoretical energies predicted from the GBE and OGE models as described in the text, respectively. The shaded boxes represent the experimental energies with their uncertainties (Eidelman et al, 2004). 

A brief review of the complexities to which the quark theory is addressed is in order. Particles which can interact via the strong nuclear force arc called hadrons. Hadrons can be divided into two main classes—the mesous (with baryon number zero) and the baryons (with nonzero baryon number). Within each of the classes there are small subclasses. The subclass of baryons which has been known ihe longest consists of those particles with spin j and even parity. The members of this class are the proton, the neutron, the A0 hyperon, the three hyperons and the two 3 hyperons. There are no baryons with spin 4 and even parity (or, to the usual notation, Jp = i+). The next family of baryons has ten members, each with Jp = l+. The mesons can be grouped into similar families. One of the first successes of the quark model was to explain just why there should be eight baryons with Jp = 1, ten with 1, etc., and why the various members of these families have the particular quantum numbers observed. 

Detail tests on nuclear models require not only a knowledge of energy, spin and parity of many levels, but also the determination of transition multipolarities and branching ratios. Precise intensities are thus needed. The well shielded anti-Compton spectrometer offers a rather simple solution especially for accurate angular distribution measurements. When the spectra are very complex, like in the case of final doubly odd nuclei, intensities cannot be determined without use of high resolution instruments. The curved crystal spectrometer provides a powerful solution at, unfortunately, non negligible cost. 

It is remarkable that Fermi introduced this essentially correct interaction only two years after the discovery of the neutron and one year after Pauli s hypothesis of the neutrino. Fermi modeled his interaction after QED, with = 7p, but the actual interaction has to be determined by experiment. After a confusing period in which experiments appeared to indicate tensor-type interactions, the so-called V-A theory was developed, which has the remarkable feature of breaking parity invariance. Specifically, one has Fp = 7 (1 — 75), in which the 7 75 part changes sign under a parity transformation. The V-A interaction creates particles with negative helic-ity, which means that, if they have velocities close to the speed of light, their spins are oriented against the direction of motion. 

Measurements by photographic photometry require careful calibration due to the nonlinear response of photographic plates saturation effects can lead to erroneous values. Line profiles can be recorded photoelectrically, if the stability of the source intensity and the wavelength scanning mechanism are adequate. Often individual rotational lines are composed of incompletely resolved spin or hyperfine multiplet components. The contribution to the linewidth from such unresolved components can vary with J (or TV). In order to obtain the FWHM of an individual component, it is necessary to construct a model for the observed lineshape that takes into account calculated level splitttings and transition intensities. An average of the widths for two lines corresponding to predissociated levels of the same parity and J -value (for example the P and R lines of a 1II — 1E+ transition) can minimize experimental uncertainties. A theoretical Lorentzian shape is assumed here for simplicity, but in some cases, as explained in Section 7.9, interference effects with the continuum can result in asymmetric Fano-type lineshapes. 

Below we use the RMF model which previously has been successfully applied for describing ground states of nuclei at and away from the )3-stability line. For nucleons, the scalar and vector potentials contribute with opposite signs in the central potential, while their sum enters in the spin-orbit potential. Due to G-parity, for antiprotons the vector potential changes sign and therefore both the scalar and the vector mesons generate attractive potentials. 

---