Spin density, definition

P is the total spinless density matrix (P = P + P ) and P is the spin density matrix (P = p" + P ). For a closed-shell system Mayer s definition of the bond order reduces to ... 

As mentioned in the start of Chapter 4, the correlation between electrons of parallel spin is different from that between electrons of opposite spin. The exchange energy is by definition given as a sum of contributions from the a and /3 spin densities, as exchange energy only involves electrons of the same spin. The kinetic energy, the nuclear-electron attraction and Coulomb terms are trivially separable. 

The magnetic field seen by the probe neutron is solely due to the magnetic dipole moment density of the unpaired electrons. In other words, the magnetisation density is simply related to the electron spin density by a multiplicative factor, and there is no ambiguity in its definition. 

To understand chemical processes, it is useful to have information besides total energies. Electron localization methods provide insight on the behavior of electrons in molecules. Properties, such as electron density, spin density, and the electron pair localization function (EPLF) [33], can routinely be computed by post-processing. The EPLF provides a quantitative description of electron pairing in molecular systems and has similarities to the electron localization function (ELF) of Becke and Edgecombe [34]. The QMC method is a particularly well-suited approach for obtaining such information because the simple and general definition of EPLF is easily evaluated in QMC. 

A considerable difference has been observed between the spectrum of cyclohexyl and that of the cyclopentyl radical, the former exhibiting a pronounced shoulder at 250 nm with e = 920 m -1 cm-1. Cyclohexenyl and cyclopentenyl radicals show a much stronger absorption with definite maxima at 240 nm. These are allyl type radicals and like the allyl radical itself they show extinction coefficients of 7000-9000 M -1 cm-1. The optical spectrum of the allyl radical is greatly affected by unsaturated substituents which conjugate with the allylic 1 and 3 positions. These positions bear all the spin density and their interaction with carboxyl groups, for example, shifts max to 270 nm with extinction coefficients of 20,000-40,000 M 1 cm 1 (Neta and Schuler, 1975). A carboxyl group attached to the central carbon of allyl has only a minimal effect on the absorption. 

HJ point out that in the detailed work on H2 by Kolos and Wolniewicz,114 the first excited state 3 2 was found to have a very weak minimum at a large separation. This binding presumably arises from a van der Waals force which is not included in the density functional theory when a local approximation to exchange and correlation is employed. Nevertheless, as HJ point out, their study of the corresponding state of the dimers Li2-Cs2 revealed a weak, but definite maximum in each case. Rough estimates of binding energy and equilibrium separation are shown in Table 16. It is, of course, possible that these results are a consequence of the local spin-density approximation, so that further work will... 

The bulk of the evidence suggests that the answer is yes. No other ESR signature of a deep state has been found (although there is some indication of oxygen-related deep defects in alloys, and possibly a spinless defect in ion-bombarded a-Si H). The defect absorption is proportional to the ESR spin density with the expected transition probability. The DLTS defects are definitely shown to be the same as the 2.0055 defect and further support for the conclusion is found from deep trapping and luminescence data described in Chapter 8. Virtually all the experiments for normal a-Si H can be satisfactorily explained by the ESR-active defect. 

When r = r, eqn (El.2) becomes eqn (1.11) hence, p(r) is said to be a diagonal element of r< (r, r ). While eqns (1.11) and (El.2) are formally alike, one can calculate the kinetic energy from the latter but not from the former, for only in the latter can one insert the operator between the natural orbitals and let it act separately on or rjf. The average value of a two-electron property can be expressed in terms of the diagonal elements of the second-order density matrix r (ri,r2). Assuming a summation over electron spins, its definition is... 

Computational and ESR spectroscopic studies were performed on complexes formally derived from "Rh(CO)4 by ligand substitution. The structures of the complexes were in between square planar and tetrahedral geometry. Definitive data regarding the position of the electron in these complexes (analogues of the important "Co(CO)4 radical discussed in a later section) led to the conclusion that spin density localized on the Rh center was smaller than that on the coordinated ligands, even for CO ... 

The D values in Table 4 display some interesting and remarkable trends in the spin-delocalizing ability of the heteroaryl substituents. The three regio-isomeric pyridyl-substituted triplet diradicals 12g ( — 0.01), 12i ( — 0.05), and 12k (—0.06) delocalize spin worse than the phenyl reference system in the order para > ortho > meta phenyl. Especially in the ortho and para isomers delocalization is definitely less effective than for phenyl. Thus, the pyridyl derivatives act as spin donors by enhancing the spin density at the radical site, although the effects are relatively small. The small effects are mainly due to destabilizing aminyl-type radical structures with unfavorable spin accumulation at the nitrogen atom (Fig. 20) [61]. 

We have already mentioned that the choice of an appropriate independent-particle model is a problem in itself, espedally for open-shell systems. One of the effects which are correlation only in the frame of a particular definition is spin polarization. This remark is connected with the question of the role of correlation in spin densities and hyperfine splitting constants in free radicals. 

Interpretation of magnetic effects in metals and alloys is difficult because a definite electronic structure cannot be easily assigned to individual atoms, and there may be some unpaired 4i-spin density in the conduction band. The... 

In the latter case, one has to be aware of solutions with broken spatial symmetry. This problem arises also in NCSDFT the (initial) symmetry of a system, as described by a scalar Hamiltonian, is destroyed by the vector field term proportional to as, which, similarly to an external magnetic field, reduces the spatial symmetry of the one-electron Hamiltonian. In spin-polarized calculations including SO interaction, the conventional collinear approach, where only one component of the spin-density s = Tr a p) is used in the definition of the xc energy functional, has the major drawback of breaking the spatial symmetry of the energy functional [18,64]. 

The spin density and the coupling density may be presented in a similar way, as follows from the definitions (12) and (16). 

---