Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spectral density term

Whatever model is used, the problem with equation (1) is that it is intrinsically underdetermined since it contains the product of interaction and spectral density terms. The usual solution is to examine relaxation at different temperatures and assume a function (usually exponential) for the temperature dependence of the correlation times. This is problematic in foods, as the structure of food is typically very temperature dependent. The alternative is directly to determine the spectral density function of the material by determining 7, over a wide range of frequencies. This may be done by using fast field cycling NMR. [Pg.132]

The typical spectral density term tc/(1+uj t ) has the following characteristics. In a particular system and for a... [Pg.132]

In the second spectral density term. In the extreme narrowing limit, the NOE value can be obtained from this data ... [Pg.141]

The spectral density represented by Eq. (25) can be used in place of any of the spectral densities discussed so far to provide a correlation time distribution however, the appropriate geometric factors A, B, and C in Eq. (21) or Co, C], and C2 in Eq. (22) would need to be coefficients to spectral density terms formed by Eq. (25). The effect of imposing a correlation time distribution is to (a) broaden the NMR resonance regardless of correlation time (b) raise the Tj minimum with a diminished slope (T, versus Tc plot) and (c) decrease the NOE from its maximum in the extreme narrowing limit (t l/cu) while maintaining a measurable NOE at longer correlation times. [Pg.360]

Although the power spectral density contains information about the surface roughness, it is often convenient to describe the surface roughness in terms of a single number or quantity. The most commonly used surface-finish parameter is the root-mean-squared (rms) roughness a. The rms roughness is given in terms of the instrument s band width and modulation transfer function, M(p, q) as... [Pg.714]

Here, the J terms are the spectral densities with the resonance frequencies co of the and nuclei, respectively. It is now necessary to find an appropriate spectral density to describe the reorientational motions properly (cf [6, 7]). The simplest spectral density commonly used for interpretation of NMR relaxation data is the one introduced by Bloembergen, Purcell, and Pound [8]. [Pg.170]

The value of an is inversely proportional to the square root of the integration time, so in terms of spectral density (one-sided) it has a white amplitude ... [Pg.320]

Each mirror wiU be affected by this noise and it can be shown that the effects will be uncorrelated in the two arms. In terms of equivalent gw spectral density we have... [Pg.321]

Noise is characterized by the time dependence of noise amplitude A. The measured value of A (the instantaneous value of potential or current) depends to some extent on the time resolution of the measuring device (its frequency bandwidth A/). Since noise always is a signal of alternating sign, its intensity is characterized in terms of the mean square of amplitude, A, over the frequency range A/, and is called (somewhat unfortunately) noise power. The Fourier transform of the experimental time dependence of noise intensity leads to the frequency dependence of noise intensity. In the literature these curves became known as PSD (power spectral density) plots. [Pg.626]

For folded proteins, relaxation data are commonly interpreted within the framework of the model-free formalism, in which the dynamics are described by an overall rotational correlation time rm, an internal correlation time xe, and an order parameter. S 2 describing the amplitude of the internal motions (Lipari and Szabo, 1982a,b). Model-free analysis is popular because it describes molecular motions in terms of a set of intuitive physical parameters. However, the underlying assumptions of model-free analysis—that the molecule tumbles with a single isotropic correlation time and that internal motions are very much faster than overall tumbling—are of questionable validity for unfolded or partly folded proteins. Nevertheless, qualitative insights into the dynamics of unfolded states can be obtained by model-free analysis (Alexandrescu and Shortle, 1994 Buck etal., 1996 Farrow etal., 1995a). An extension of the model-free analysis to incorporate a spectral density function that assumes a distribution of correlation times on the nanosecond time scale has recently been reported (Buevich et al., 2001 Buevich and Baum, 1999) and better fits the experimental 15N relaxation data for an unfolded protein than does the conventional model-free approach. [Pg.344]

In Equation (5), we can first notice (i) the factor 1/r6 which makes the spectral density very sensitive to the interatomic distance, and (ii) the dynamical part which is the Fourier transform of a correlation function involving the Legendre polynomial. We shall denote this Fourier transform by (co) (we shall dub this quantity "normalized spectral density"). For calculating the relevant longitudinal relaxation rate, one has to take into account the transition probabilities in the energy diagram of a two-spin system. In the expression below, the first term corresponds to the double quantum (DQ) transition, the second term to single quantum (IQ) transitions and the third term to the zero quantum (ZQ) transition. [Pg.94]

Elastomers are solids, even if they are soft. Their atoms have distinct mean positions, which enables one to use the well-established theory of solids to make some statements about their properties in the linear portion of the stress-strain relation. For example, in the theory of solids the Debye or macroscopic theory is made compatible with lattice dynamics by equating the spectral density of states calculated from either theory in the long wavelength limit. The relation between the two macroscopic parameters, Young s modulus and Poisson s ratio, and the microscopic parameters, atomic mass and force constant, is established by this procedure. The only differences between this theory and the one which may be applied to elastomers is that (i) the elastomer does not have crystallographic symmetry, and (ii) dissipation terms must be included in the equations of motion. [Pg.243]

In the first part to follow, the equations of motion of a soft solid are written in the harmonic approximation. The matrices that describe the potential, and hence the structure, of the material are then considered in a general way, and their properties under a normal mode transformation are discussed. The same treatment is given to the dissipation terms. The long wavelength end of the spectral density is of interest, and here it seems that detailed matrix calculations can be replaced by simple scaling arguments. This shows how the inertial term, usually absent in molecular problems, is magnified to become important in the continuum limit. [Pg.244]

The first term in the bracket stands for the mean, and the second for the spectral density matrix. For the continuous formulation, the covariances for the model and observation errors are given as... [Pg.157]

As pointed out in the previous section, the Chebyshev operator can be viewed as a cosine propagator. By analogy, both the energy wave function and the spectrum can also be obtained using a spectral method. More specifically, the spectral density operator can be defined in terms of the conjugate Chebyshev order (k) and Chebyshev angle (0) 128 132... [Pg.311]

Since diffusing species move randomly in all directions, the diffusing species may sense the self-affine fractal surface and the self-similar fractal surface in quite different ways. Nevertheless a little attention has been paid to diffusion towards self-affine fractal electrodes. Only a few researchers have realized this problem Borosy et al.148 reported that diffusion towards self-affine fractal surface leads to the conventional Cottrell relation rather than the generalized Cottrell relation, and Kant149,150 discussed the anomalous current transient behavior of the self-affine fractal surface in terms of power spectral density of the surface. [Pg.372]

This approach yields spectral densities. Although it does not require assumptions about the correlation function and therefore is not subjected to the limitations intrinsic to the model-free approach, obtaining information about protein dynamics by this method is no more straightforward, because it involves a similar problem of the physical (protein-relevant) interpretation of the information encoded in the form of SD, and is complicated by the lack of separation of overall and local motions. To characterize protein dynamics in terms of more palpable parameters, the spectral densities will then have to be analyzed in terms of model-free parameters or specific motional models derived e.g. from molecular dynamics simulations. The SD method can be extremely helpful in situations when no assumption about correlation function of the overall motion can be made (e.g. protein interaction and association, anisotropic overall motion, etc. see e.g. Ref. [39] or, for the determination of the 15N CSA tensor from relaxation data, Ref. [27]). [Pg.290]

The symbols Rauto and Rcross within the relaxation matrix are the auto- and cross-relaxation rates, respectively. and (l2Z) are the longitudinal magnetizations of spin 1 and 2, respectively, and the brackets indicate averaging over the whole ensemble of spins. Rcross in terms of the spectral densities is given by... [Pg.356]

The symbol Re(K ((o)) denotes the real part of the complex spectral density, corresponding to the autocorrelation of the dipolar interactions, while Re(i (co)) is its counterpart for the scalar interaction. The symbol Re(K (a>)) denotes the spectral density describing the cross-correlation of the two parts of the hyperfine interaction. The cross-correlation vanishes at the MSB level of the theory, but in the more complicated case of the lattice containing the electron spin, the cross term may be non-zero. A general expression for the dipolar spectral density is ... [Pg.62]

A similar approach, also based on the Kubo-Tomita theory (103), has been proposed in a series of papers by Sharp and co-workers (109-114), summarized nicely in a recent review (14). Briefly, Sharp also expressed the PRE in terms of a power density function (or spectral density) of the dipolar interaction taken at the nuclear Larmor frequency. The power density was related to the Fourier-Laplace transform of the time correlation functions (14) ... [Pg.76]

Bertini and co-workers 119) and Kruk et al. 96) formulated a theory of electron spin relaxation in slowly-rotating systems valid for arbitrary relation between the static ZFS and the Zeeman interaction. The unperturbed, static Hamiltonian was allowed to contain both these interactions. Such an unperturbed Hamiltonian, Hq, depends on the relative orientation of the molecule-fixed P frame and the laboratory frame. For cylindrically symmetric ZFS, we need only one angle, p, to specify the orientation of the two frames. The eigenstates of Hq(P) were used to define the basis set in which the relaxation superoperator Rzpsi ) expressed. The superoperator M, the projection vectors and the electron-spin spectral densities cf. Eqs. (62-64)), all become dependent on the angle p. The expression in Eq. (61) needs to be modified in two ways first, we need to include the crossterms electron-spin spectral densities, and These terms can be... [Pg.79]

An analytical theory of the outer-sphere PRE for slowly rotating systems with an arbitrary electron spin quantum number S, appropriate at the limit of low field, has been proposed by Kruk et al. (144). The theory deals with the case of axial as well as rhombic static ZFS. In analogy to the inner sphere case (95), the PRE for the low field limit could be expressed in terms of the electron spin spectral densities s ... [Pg.89]

A more general theory for outer-sphere paramagnetic relaxation enhancement, valid for an arbitrary relation between the Zeeman coupling and the axial static ZFS, has been developed by Kruk and co-workers (96 in the same paper which dealt with the inner-sphere case. The static ZFS was included, along with the Zeeman interaction in the unperturbed Hamiltonian. The general expression for the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation rate of the outer-sphere nuclei was written in terms of electron spin spectral densities, as ... [Pg.90]


See other pages where Spectral density term is mentioned: [Pg.131]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.1505]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.141 ]




SEARCH



Spectral density

Spectral terms

© 2024 chempedia.info