Specific interfacial surface area calculation

The specific interfacial surface area, S, defined as the ratio of interfacial surface area. A, to thl volume, V, is calculated from the value of correlation distance obtained by plotting the scattered intensity in the Debye fashion [ 12,38]. 

Given the knowledge of the material amount and surface requirement (a. i) of the liquid components (n ) in the interfacial phase, the part of the surface on which a given i-th component is adsorbed can be calculated (i=l,2). From the adsorption isotherms, the adsorption capacity of the pure components (n ) and the value of the so-called equivalent specific surface area (a ) can be calculated[19]. 

Coombes et al (11), and Butt (12). They had found that the kinetic rate constant could be correlated in terms of an acidity function. The specific acidity function will be considered in more detail later. Values for the interfacial area and for diffusivity values were estimated employing correlations found in the literature (13,14,15) density and interfacial surface tension values needed to solve these correlations were determined experimentally in this investigation. Schiefferle (16) has reported details of the calculations for determining each of the above-mentioned terms. 

Cai (Figure 2.38e), as well as the thickness of the interfacial structured water (Figure 2.38f). These correlations are caused by several factors (i) number and acidity of surface sites, (ii) nonuniformity of the surface, and (iii) specific surface area (% and are calculated per surface area unit), aggregation of primary particles (i.e., Vj, value). The influence not only of the number of B- sites but also other factors on the surface properties of mixed oxides is clearly depicted from comparison of the data shown in Figures 2.38 and 2.43. 

The particle size was calculated on the basis of specific surface areas determined by a titration procedure, and assuming the particle is anhydrous SiO,. The values of , the interfacial energy calculated from the slopes of the lines A and B, using the equation... 

TTie best way to measure surface areas is by using rapid chemical reactions with known kinetics, that take place in a very thin zone close to the interface. Since the rate is proportional to the surface area, the latter can be calculated from rate measurements. The relevant principles are presented in section 5,42J. Surface areas can also be calculated from measured values of the bubble holdup and the mean bubble diameter, according to eq. (4.51). From the two empirical relations by Van Dierendonck (1970), eqs. (4.54) and (4.57), a third can be derived, giving the specific interfacial area a for solutions of electrolytes and liquid mixtures ... 

When mass transfer has to be taken into account, the calculations of section 7.1.3 ought to be applicable. However, when the dispersed phase is consumed to a large extent, the interfacial area is no longer a constant. Another equation has to be found that relates a to the consumption of reactant A in the dispersed phase (compare next section). However, since it may be difficult to measure the surface area experimentally, one may have to resort to more empirical methods for describing the process. On scale-up, the critical factor for the dispersion will be the specific energy dissipation. 

Abstract Broad principles of Solid-Liquid calorimetry together with some illustrative examples of its use in the field of catalysis are presented here. The first use is related to the determination of surface properties of catalysts, adsorbents and solid materials in contact with liquids. In particular, it is shown how to evaluate the capacity of a given solid to establish different types of interaction with its liquid environment or to calculate its specific surface area accessible to liquids. The second use includes the measurement of the heat effects accompanying catalytic reactions and the related interfacial phenomena at Solid-Liquid and Liquid-Liquid interfaces. Examples of competitive ion adsorption from dilute aqueous solutions, as well as the formation of surfactant aggregates either in aqueous solution or at the Solid-Liquid interface are considered in view of potential applications in Environmental Remediation and Micellar Catalysis. 

This area has received special attention from theoreticians. The most commonly used methodology for the calculation of the particle(ion)-metal interaction is to approximate the metal surface with a cluster of several atoms with the crystallographic organization typical of the metal studied. Although such an approach has many limitations and introduces certain difficulties, cluster-model calculations are becoming more popular in studies of interfacial interactions. Section 3.10.2 gives a brief review of quantum studies related to adsorption on metal surfaces in the cluster model approximation. In Section 3.10.3 a more detailed analysis of some aspects of this methodology is described, and is related to some recently published work on the problem of specific adsorption phenomenon. 

The adhesion of metal layers deposited onto polymer surfaces is determined by the concentration and the bond strength of the chemical and physical interactions between the metal atoms and the functional (polar) groups at the polymer surfaces. Each type of functional group produces individual metal-polymer interactions, and makes a specific contribution depending on its concentration to the interfacial adhesion and consequently to the related shear or peel strength of metal-polymer systems (see Fig. 18.1). Thus for each type x of metal-functional group interaction a, the work of adhesion is calculated with Eq. (1), with A=area, I = Loschmidfs constant, and C = concentration. 

Some of the methods developed for bulk liquids have also been used to calculate the hypothetical IR spectra of water at interfaces. Those studies are consistent with the experimental observation of dangling interfacial OH bonds. °° ° However, to compare directly with SFG experiments, several groups developed simulation techniques for computing the SFG spectrum. The work in this area is an excellent demonstration of the benefit of combining experiments and simulations to gain insight into the microscopic structure of water at interfaces. In particular, theory has been able to demonstrate the degree to which the spectrum is surface specific and to attribute specific features in the spectra to specific molecular structures. 

---